Term
|
Definition
Threatens validity when events occur between the pretest and post-test of a research study that could affect participants in such a way to impacts the dependent variable.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The process of maturing which takes place in the individual during the duration of the experiment which is not a result of specific events but of simply growing older, growing more tired, or similar changes.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The pretest or baseline measurement is usually compared to a posttest measurement to determine the effectiveness of a program. Effect is determined by any differences seen from a baseline to a posttest.
Use of a control group that does not receive any pretesting will reduce this threat to internal validity. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The actual physical instrument that collects data in an experiment. Written instruments must accurately measure what they are suppose to or internal validity will be effected.
Researchers must use well-designed instruments reduce this threat to internal validity. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
When individuals are selected in a nonrandom manner, which may reduce internal validity. Volunteers must often be recruited to participate in studies because it is not possible to use random selection and require those selected to participate in a treatment.
|
|
|
Term
Selection Maturation Effect |
|
Definition
Occurs when using intact groups that vary in their maturation level.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Groups are chosen because of extreme scores of measurements; those scores or measurements tend to move toward the mean with repeated measurements even without an experimental variable.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
participants drop out of the study or cannot be located. Loss of subjects can create problems in terms of group comparisons when the number of participants in some groups fall below established guidelines for statistical analysis.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Altered behavior due to the effects of being studied and observed. Anytime an experimental group receives special attention over the control group, any noted differences in the two groups can be a result of special attention given in the experimental group and not effect the independent group.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Altered behavior because of expectations rather than treatment. A control group usually receives a placebo in order to measure the differences between the control and experimental group.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Occurs when the treatment being applied to one group spills over or contaminates another group.
Can be difficult in both the control and experimental interact. However, researchers can explain the importance of keeping some aspects confidential or they can find a different community. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Occurs when there are differences in the locations where interventions take place. Each intervention is being implemented at a different corporate site to control for a possible diffusion effect. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Individual(s) responsible for implementing the experimental treatment and the possibility that they may inadvertently introduce inequality or bias into the study.
|
|
|
Term
Selection Treatment Interaction |
|
Definition
Concerns the ability of a researcher to generalize the results of a study beyond the groups involved in the study.
Use of random sample of participants, results can be legitimately be generalized to the group from which the random sample was selected.
|
|
|
Term
Setting Treatment Interaction |
|
Definition
Concerns the extent to which the environmental conditions or setting under which an experimental study was conducted can be duplicated in other settings.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a study that does a good job controlling for the possible effects of extraneous variables on the dependent variable.
Observed effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable are real and not caused. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
concerned with the ability to generalize the study results to other groups and settings beyond those in the current experiment.
Research that can be generalized will have more value |
|
|
Term
How do we control internal validity in a History effect? |
|
Definition
In order to control validity- use a control group that is not exposed to the treatment, and compare the results to a experimental group. |
|
|
Term
How do you control internal validity in a Maturation effect? |
|
Definition
A control group can be created to eliminate this threat.
|
|
|
Term
How do we create internal validity for instrumentation? |
|
Definition
Researchers must use well-designed instruments reduce this threat to internal validity. |
|
|
Term
How do we control internal validity for testing? |
|
Definition
Use of a control group that does not receive any pretesting will reduce this threat to internal validity. |
|
|
Term
How do we control internal validity for selection bias? |
|
Definition
pretesting groups on measures of the dependent variable to make sure there are no pretreatment differences between groups is another control that can be used. |
|
|
Term
How do we control internal validity for a selection maturation effect? |
|
Definition
Pretesting and/or prescreening can be used on maturity levels in a way to avoid the threat to internal validity. |
|
|
Term
How do we control internal validity for a statistical regression? |
|
Definition
Study would have to be designed to follow a random sample of participants representing the range of the scores rather than placing participants in high and low groups on one testing. |
|
|
Term
How do we retain internal validity in a mortality/attriction effect? |
|
Definition
A researcher can either try to replace participants, however, that can negatively affect the results thus the study may not be able to generalize results. |
|
|
Term
How do we control internal validity in a Hawthorne effect? |
|
Definition
Researcher will try to evenly distribute the special attention to both groups so they can study the differences in the intervention. |
|
|
Term
How do we retain internal validity in a Placebo effect? |
|
Definition
tries to make sure that those in both control and experimental groups receive the same information so that both groups have similar expectation. They also can use a blind or double blind study to prevent any biases. |
|
|
Term
How can we control a diffusion of treatment effect? |
|
Definition
Can be difficult in both the control and experimental interact. However, researchers can explain the importance of keeping some aspects confidential or they can find a different community. |
|
|
Term
How can we control internal validity in a location effect? |
|
Definition
Make locations the same for all participants. If not possible, try to minimize location differences that could impact the dependent variable. |
|
|
Term
How can internal validity be controlled in an implemenation effect? |
|
Definition
Controlled by making sure that all persons responsible for implementing the program are equally trained and competent, by following a standardized protocol for implementation. Also have someone other than the program creator present the program. |
|
|
Term
History Treatment Interaction |
|
Definition
External validity develops when a researcher tries to generalize findings to past and future situations. |
|
|
Term
How do we control external validity in a selection treatment interaction? |
|
Definition
Use of random sample of participants, results can be legitimately be generalized to the group from which the random sample was selected. |
|
|
Term
How do we control external validity in a history treatment interaction? |
|
Definition
Some experiments may be time-sensitive and may not produce similar results if conducted earlier or later. |
|
|