Term
|
Definition
A touching of the body A voluntary act; with the intent to cause a harmful or offensive contact or imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact;, harmful or offensive contact occurs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A touching of the mind A voluntary act; with the intent to cause a harmful or offensive contact; or imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact; and imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact results |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A voluntary act; with the intent to confine another to a bounded area, confinement occurs for an appreciable amount of time (no matter how short); victim must be conscious of the confinement or harmed by it |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Can be a physical barrier or threat of force |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Limited range of movement |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Contact that would offend a reasonable sense of personal dignity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Voluntary act; with intent to enter; entry occurs; land of another; entry occurs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
awareness or belief that battery is imminent without significant delay |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Voluntary act; with intent to interfere; with chattel property; of another |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
tangible, moveable personal property |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Temporarily deprive, or use or intermeddle with property that causes damage |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Voluntary act; with intent to exercise substantial dominion; over chattel property; of another; which so seriously interferes with another's control over the chattel that defendant is responsible for the full value thereof |
|
|
Term
Intentional infliction of emotional distress |
|
Definition
Extreme and outrageous conduct; with intent to cause severe emotional distress or recklessly cause severe emotional distress; severe emotional distress occurs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
extent and duration of control (think civil version of embezzlement - conversion to own use) |
|
|
Term
Extreme and outrageous conduct |
|
Definition
determined by context of relationship, severity or regularity of conduct, knowledge of plaintiff's vulnerability |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
deliberate disregard of a high probability that severe emotional distress will occur |
|
|
Term
Third person claims for IIED |
|
Definition
third party must be present, either a family member or suffers bodily harm as a result |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
intend one tort and cause another, not applicable to IIED |
|
|
Term
Privilege of self-defense |
|
Definition
Reasonable force allowed to protect against imminent threat of harm to self or third person; reasonably apparent need to use such force; force or threat of force used is reasonable in relation to the threat posed |
|
|
Term
Can you protect property with deadly force? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
reasonable force allowed to protect against imminent threat of harm to other individual(s) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
negates the intent; defendant does not have the knowledge that the contact will be harmful or offensive; consent can be revoked at any time as long as revocation is communicated |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
apparent consent; consent requires an understanding; consent is not a defense under duress or incapacitation; cannot consent to an illegal act |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent imminent public disaster; no compensation; not liable for trespass; government is required to compensate in a constitutional taking |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
One is privileged to enter and remain n the land of another if there is an imminent need to avoid danger, but still liable to any damages to the land or property |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
duty, breach, causation (actual and proximate), damages |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
legal obligation that if it exists is measured by a standard of care |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
care a reasonable person would exercise under same or similar circumstances to avoid or minimize reasonably foreseeable risks of harm to others |
|
|
Term
Intoxication standard of care |
|
Definition
same as a sober individual |
|
|
Term
Infirmity standard of care |
|
Definition
person with a like infirmity |
|
|
Term
Superior knowledge standard of care |
|
Definition
exercise superior qualities that he has in a manner reasonable under the circumstances |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
reasonably careful child of the same age in similar circumstances; if engaged in adult activities, adult standard R/P standard of care applies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Special relationship, contract, case law, or other legally recognized entity, voluntary undertaking, creation of the risk |
|
|
Term
Duty of carriers/host drivers |
|
Definition
Must exercise more than ordinary care, standard of care stops just short of ensuring safety |
|
|
Term
Landowner unaware of trespasser |
|
Definition
duty to refrain from wanton/willful conduct |
|
|
Term
Landowner aware if trespasser |
|
Definition
reasonable person standard of care |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
attractive nuisance doctrine |
|
|
Term
Rule 1 of nuisance doctrine |
|
Definition
Artificial condition in which the owner knows children are likely to trespass and the condition is likely to cause unreasonable risk of serious injury or death |
|
|
Term
Rule 2 of attractive nuisance |
|
Definition
The place where the condition exists is one which which the possessor knows or has reason to know children are likely to trespass |
|
|
Term
Rule 3 of attractive nuisance |
|
Definition
The condition is one which the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he realizes or should realize will involve an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm |
|
|
Term
Rule 4 of attractive nuisance |
|
Definition
The children because of their youth do not discover the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with it or coming within the area made dangerous by it |
|
|
Term
Rule 5 of attractive nuisance |
|
Definition
The utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition and the burden of eliminating the danger are slight as compared to the risk to children involved |
|
|
Term
Rule 6 of attractive nuisance |
|
Definition
The possessor fails to exercise reasonable care to eliminate the danger or otherwise protect the children |
|
|
Term
Rule 7 of attractive nuisance |
|
Definition
Jurisdictions differ on comparative negligence of children |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Someone on the property at the invitation of the owner - business invitee and public invitee - R/P standard of care in all circumstances |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
On land with permission but limited license to be there (social guests) Duty to avoid wanton or willful conduct unless aware of danger - the there is R/P standard of care |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Eliminates duty but the plaintiff is negligent in failing to avoid a hazard that is known and appreciated |
|
|
Term
Duty to protect from third persons |
|
Definition
Only applicable if the harm is foreseeable and there is a special relationship between defendant and third party (custodial relationship + foreseeability) |
|
|
Term
Duty created by special relationship |
|
Definition
Carrier-passenger; innkeeper-guest; landowner-lawful entrant; employer-employee; school-student; landlord -tenant; custodian-person in custody; voluntary undertaking, defendant causes harm, defendant creates risk of harm, statutory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A person who undertakes to render services to another has a duty to use reasonable care if failure to exercise reasonable care would increase risk of had; or a person relies on the actor in the undertaking |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
gratuitous promise + no action = no duty |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
gratuitous promise +reliance + no action = no duty |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Failure to exercise reasonable person standard of care |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Burden, probability, injury (BPL)
1. BPL = no negligence (met reasonable s/c) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
not subject to scrutiny of duty and breach 1. statute must be clear 2. plaintiff's injury must be the type statute was designed to prevent 3. plaintiff must be in class of persons statute intended to protect |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Injury alone speaks for itself as evidence of negligence 1. Injury is more likely than not the result of negligence 2. Defendant is more likely than not the cause of such negligence 3. No 3rd parties intervened |
|
|
Term
Proportional liability system |
|
Definition
Defendant is only responsible for share of fault |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Can enforce entire judgment against any defendant |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Each defendant pays only their share |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
But for test - but for defendant's negligence, plaintiff would not have been harmed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
separate injuries - each defendant liable for each injury one injury - use fault apportionment |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Applies when there are multiple causes of injury, negligent defendant's "but for" test fails |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
When but for and substantial factor fail Both defendants are liable - burden of proof shifts to defendants to disprove they are the cause of injury |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
legal cause - scope of foreseeable risk |
|
|
Term
Rules for proximate cause |
|
Definition
Is the plaintiff a foreseeable plaintiff? Is the harm suffered within the scope of foreseeable risks created by the defendant's negligence? |
|
|
Term
Test for foreseeable plaintiff |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Test for scope of foreseeable risks |
|
Definition
Extent of harm - if harm is foreseeable, defendant is liable Intervening/superseding causation |
|
|
Term
Intervening/superseding causation |
|
Definition
1. Superseding cause eliminates liability 2. Intervening cause in the scope of foreseeable risk does not eliminate liability 3. Risk is terminated when plaintiff reaches apparent safety |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Duty in medical malpractice |
|
Definition
Established by a doctor/patient relationship |
|
|
Term
Standard of care in medical malpractice |
|
Definition
A physician must exercise that degree of care, skill, and proficiency exercised by reasonably careful, skillful and prudent practitioners in the same class to which s/he belongs, acting under same or similar circumstances - established by expert testimony unless understandable to layperson or res ipsa |
|
|
Term
Standard of care encompasses ? |
|
Definition
Locality, advances in the profession, availability of the facility, whether the doctor is a specialist of general practitioner |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Held to the standards of their specialty |
|
|
Term
Res Ipsa in medical malpractice |
|
Definition
Can be used along with expert testimony where no way injury could have occurred outside negligence |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Patient - all information material to intelligent decision by patient Professional - what doctors consider it necessary to disclose (only risks inherent to procedure, not success rate) |
|
|
Term
Causation in informed consent |
|
Definition
1. Unrevealed risk must materialize 2. Plaintiff must show that had the proper information been provided that she would not have undergone the procedure 3. A reasonable person would not have undergone the procedure |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
When plaintiff engages in negligence that contributes to the plaintiff's injury |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
comparing the fault of the plaintiff and defendant to determine percentage of liability of each |
|
|
Term
Comparative fault does not factor when ? |
|
Definition
1. Defendant has a duty to protect the plaintiff from harm engaged 2. Defendant has a duty to the plaintiff because plaintiff's own negligence would not have occurred without the brach by the defendant 3. Plaintiff's entitlement 4. Rescue doctrine - cannot recover on negligence of rescuer unless the rescuer acted recklessly |
|
|
Term
Types of comparative fault |
|
Definition
Pure comparative fault - no matter the amount of liability on part of the plaintiff, plaintiff can still recover Modified comparative fault - if plaintiff is 50% or less |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Aware of the risk; understand the risk; voluntarily assume the risk |
|
|
Term
Primary assumption of the risk |
|
Definition
A defendant owes no duty to protect the plaintiff from harm |
|
|
Term
Secondary assumption of the risk |
|
Definition
Defendant may have been negligent, and a plaintiff may have assumed certain risks to that they may be compared (assumed into comparative negligence system) |
|
|
Term
Express assumption of the risk |
|
Definition
contractual assumption (waiver) - can bar recovery 1. cannot offend public policy 2. cannot be unclear of ambiguous 3. is risk within the scope of release? |
|
|
Term
Implied assumption of the risk |
|
Definition
Risks inherent in the activity and voluntary participation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
bars stale claims Traditional rule - injury occurs on date of alleged negligence Discovery rule - statute begins running when plaintiff discovers the injury and defendant's role in causing it |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Duty is waived - analyze possible immunity before duty |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Soldier cannot sue the Federal government |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Parental, Feres Rule, Municipal/Governmental |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Waives immunity where the government, if a private individual, would be liable. Government is only liable to the extent a private person would be liable |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Discretionary immunity, certain immunities, immunity for enforcement of a statute or regulation, immunity for dignitary or economic torts, immunity for torts arising out of assaults, battery, libel, etc. |
|
|
Term
Negligent infliction of emotion distress |
|
Definition
Analyzed under negligence standards - if plaintiff is foreseeable plaintiff |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
must be physical impact if there is no physical injury - most states have abandoned it, GA and FL still follow |
|
|
Term
Zone of danger rule (NIED) |
|
Definition
where defendant's negligence placed the plaintiff in fear of physical injury and because of that danger plaintiff suffered emotional harm |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
objective corroboration, such as medical diagnosis, or objective physical manifestation of the fright or shock |
|
|
Term
Bystander rules - Dillon v. Legg |
|
Definition
If plaintiff is foreseeable plaintiff 1. whether plaintiff was located near the scene as contrasted to far away 2. whether the shock resulted from a direct emotional impact upon the plaintiff from the sensory and contemporaneous observance 3. whether victim and plaintiff are closely related |
|
|
Term
Bystander rules - Thing v. LaChusa |
|
Definition
1. plaintiff and victim are closely related 2. is present at the scene of the injury 3. as a result suffers serious emotional distress |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Mother does not owe a duty to her fetus |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
generally medical malpractice in sterilization |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
generally when a mother might have determined to abort the fetus where there is a medical wrong |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
inapplicable as a tort, but a child after both can make a tort claim against an individual that caused harm in utero |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Claim made by spouse or children of victim when there is injury that affects relationship |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Allows estate to bring a claim that the deceased would have had if he had survived |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Allows surviving dependents to recover their own damages as a result of defendant's actions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Activity (strict liability); damages, causation |
|
|
Term
Causation in strict liability |
|
Definition
1. The defendant's activity creates a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm even when reasonable care is exercised 2. The activity is not one of common usage |
|
|
Term
Strict liability in products |
|
Definition
Defective condition, damages, causation |
|
|
Term
Theories of strict liability |
|
Definition
Misrepresentation; express warranty claims, implied warranty claims, warranty as a contract claim, strict tort liability (only for physical not economic harm) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1. more dangerous than an ordinary consumer would expect when used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable manner 2. if the benefits of the challenged design do not outweigh the risk inherent in such a design |
|
|
Term
Risks of design v. benefits of design |
|
Definition
Gravity of danger posed, foreseeability of harm, mechanical and economic foreseeability |
|
|
Term
Defective design - burden of proof |
|
Definition
There was a safer alternative; the safer alternative would have prevented or significantly reduce the risk of injury without substantially impairing the product's utility; the safer alternative was technologically and economically feasible |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Risk-utility test - when the foreseeable risks of harm posed by the product could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings and the omission renders the product unsafe |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Consumer expectations test - must be dangerous in a condition beyond what the user or consumer would expect. Includes packaging and warnings |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Risk-utility test - foreseeable risks of harm posed by the product could have been reduced or avoided by the adoption of a reasonably alternative design and the omission of the design renders the product unsafe |
|
|
Term
Defenses to products liability |
|
Definition
1. plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk occasioned by the defect 2. plaintiff misused the product in an unforeseeable manner |
|
|