Term
|
Definition
The tendency for characteristics that contribute to the survival of a species to persist and those that do not to disappear |
|
|
Term
Order evolves from _____ without __________ |
|
Definition
Order evolves from disorder without intelligent intervention |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
abrupt changes in genes, could be caused by disease/virus/etc |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a relationship between a specific event & a simple response to that event |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- present at birth or appear at predictable stages of development - appear in virtually all members of a species |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
an increase in the intensity or probability of a reflex response resulting from earlier exposure to stimulus that elicits that response |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a decrease in intensity or probability of a reflex response resulting from repeated exposure to a stimulus that elicits that response |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a series of interrelated acts found in all or nearly all members of a species (i.e. cat bristling & hissing when scared) |
|
|
Term
True or false: there are no Modal Action Patterns in humans |
|
Definition
True; they are not thoughtful actions and are triggered by a releaser (any stimulus that reliably elicits a MAP) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
any behavioral tendency that is strongly influenced by genes (Ex: activity level, aggression, introversion) |
|
|
Term
How are GBTs different from MAPs? |
|
Definition
GBT's triggers vary from organism to organism. Plasiticty of the behavior also varies, while a MAP is a reaction that happens the same way each time |
|
|
Term
Limits of Natural Selection |
|
Definition
- slow process, takes generations - Can't help living beings cope with change - role of learning |
|
|
Term
Ways to measure a change in behavior: |
|
Definition
1. errors 2. topography 3. intensity 4. speed 5. latency 6. rate/frequency |
|
|
Term
Problems with case studies: |
|
Definition
1. specific to just that subject 2. can't generalize results 3. data collected mostly through self-reports 4. prolonged data collection time needed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a study in which a researcher manipulates one or more variables and measures the effects of this manipulation on one or more variables |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the IV varies across 2 or more groups of subjects |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
IV varies at different time for same group |
|
|
Term
higher-order conditioning |
|
Definition
a variation of classical conditioning in which a stimulus is paired with a well-established condition stimulus instead of an unconditioned stimulus (food/metronome/salivation example) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the CS begins and ends before the US is presented (buzzer--> puff of air) (another example: thunder & lightning) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the CS and US overlap (Ex.: buzzer-->puff of air before buzzer ends) |
|
|
Term
simultaneous conditioning |
|
Definition
the CS and US coincide exactly |
|
|
Term
Simultaneous & Backward conditioning (are/are not) effective? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the CS follows the US (Ex.: puff of air --> buzzer) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a dependency between events (If x, then Y.) (rat example; you need the 2 things to occur together) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
In real life, the stimuluses aren't always paired together. Sometimes they're not present at all or paired with a completely different stimulus. (Ex.: how we make impressions/judgements of people) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
refers to the closeness in time or space between 2 invents. |
|
|
Term
The ________ ________ is the time between the CS and the US. |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
the ____ the time between the CS and US, the more learning that occurs |
|
Definition
shorter. exception is the simultaneous conditioning. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
two stimuli that are presented simultaneously |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the failure of a stimulus that is part of a compound stimulus to become a CS |
|
|
Term
conditioning is the most effective when both the CS and US affect ________ senses |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the failure of a conditioned response to appear as a result of prior presentation of the CS in the absence of the US. because you've experienced the CS so many times before, its affect doesn't change. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the failure of a stimulus to become a CS when it is part of the stimulus that includes an effective conditioned stimulus (CS) |
|
|
Term
Difference between overshadowing and blocking? |
|
Definition
Overshadowing occurs because one is stronger than the other, blocking occurs because you've encountered one of the stimuli beforehand |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a procedure in which two neutral stimuli are paired, after which one is repeatedly paired with an US |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a combo of errors & rate or the number of correct responses per minute (example: math problems) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
anything that affects a dependent variable & may unintentionally vary between the studies' different experimental conditions |
|
|
Term
Unconditioned Stimulus (US) |
|
Definition
a stimulus that elicits a response, such as a reflex, without learning |
|
|
Term
Unconditioned Response (UR) |
|
Definition
a response that does not have to be learned, such as a reflex |
|
|
Term
Conditioned stimulus (CS) |
|
Definition
a stimulus hat elicits a response only after learning has taken place |
|
|
Term
conditioned response (CR) |
|
Definition
a response that has been learned |
|
|
Term
problem with the stimulus-substitution theory |
|
Definition
the UCR and the CR are not always the same, and it can't account for latent inhibition, blocking, or extinction |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the procedure of repeatedly presenting the CS without the US (extinction is forgetting) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
There is a limit to the amount of conditioning that can occur in the pairing of two stimuli. (remember what each part of the equation represents & what you know from the equation)
the of the formula result is the amount of learning that has occurred on that trial |
|
|
Term
problem with Rescorla-Wagner Model |
|
Definition
you can't specify C in advance of experiment and it doesn't account for latent inhibition |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
different features of a stimulus make them a better candidate to be a CS |
|
|
Term
shorter time period between intervals usually indicate that it is the time between ________ |
|
Definition
the CS and US, not the time between the trials themselves (so it would contiguity, not intertrial interval) |
|
|
Term
difference between blocking and overshadowing |
|
Definition
overshadowing deals w/intensity of stimulus, blocking is prior exposure to a stimulus |
|
|
Term
difference between blocking and sensory preconditioning |
|
Definition
blocking: paired with a UCS before made a compound stimulus
sensory preconditioning: paired with a UCS after made a compound stimulus |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
pairing fear with something comforting/that you enjoy to get over the fear |
|
|
Term
Systematic Desensitization |
|
Definition
pairs fear with relaxation techniques, building up the stimulus (fear) |
|
|
Term
conditioning and advertising: |
|
Definition
the classical conditioning method DOES work in advertising. negative news stories affect the consumer's thoughts of products advertised during the commercial breaks. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
sexual arousal to objects, situation, or individuals that are not part of normative stimulation |
|
|
Term
People develop paraphilia when ___ are paired with ____ |
|
Definition
various stimuli with sexual arousal |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
pairing a CS (usually a sexual paraphilia) paired with a negative repines, i.e. nausea. |
|
|
Term
Reduction In Errors vs Change in Topography |
|
Definition
Reduction in Errors happens when someone continually completes the task with less mistakes each times, while Change in Topography occurs when the subject's completion of the task becomes more and more accurate to the original. (mirror tracing task example) |
|
|
Term
Change in Intensity vs Change in Speed |
|
Definition
The force it requires to push a lever/ring a bell/etc, vs How quickly the task is completed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
There is a limit to the amount of conditioning that can occur in the pairing of two stimuli. Rate of learning formula: know what the parts mean |
|
|