Term
| The Joint Commission has 6 accreditation decesion catergories what are they |
|
Definition
1. accreditation w/full standard compliance
2. provisional accreditation
3. conditional accreditation
4. preliminary denial
5. denial
6. preliminary accreditation |
|
|
Term
| is the trend in healthcare moving towards quantative or qualitative |
|
Definition
| qualitative is the trend. data quality activies are a prioroity for the medical facilities because many users and the use of the data. It is helpful to review the concepts of record content review and retrospective record completion activities related to that content. quality assessment and improvement study of patients record documentation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| a review of the health record while the patient is still hospitalized or under treatment |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| the part of the utilization review process that concentrates on a review of clinical information following patient discharge |
|
|
Term
| define ongoing record review and is it concurrently |
|
Definition
| the review of a health care facility's clinical records on an ongoing basis.clinical and him professionals review the records of current inpatients daily as well as closed records after the patients been discharged or transferred. the goal of ongoing record review is to ensure that inpatient health records are complete and accurate and the facility's documentation practices meet relevant accreditation standards, state licensing laws, and federal regulatory requirements. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| a review of the patient record that assesses how well a standard is being met.opinions,subjective,emotional aspect of healthrecord, consistency, |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| a review of the patient record to assess whether an item of required documentation is present or absent. this analysis may also apply time requirement to the expectation of required documentation. purpose: assesses the completeness and accuracy of patient health records. hardfacts, heart rate, vitals, numbers, objective |
|
|
Term
| is quantative and qualitative a required element of the health record |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| would you use a checklist in a qualitative review |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| is a review of prescribed areas of the medical record for identifying specific deficiencies in recording into ensure that it is complete, accurate, & current. Items that do never meet the criteria should be noted on a check-off sheet for future review & processing by the responsible staff–medical, dental, nursing, & allied health providers.. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| is a review of medical record entries for inconsistencies & omissions which may signify that the medical record is inaccurate or incomplete. Such an analysis requires a knowledge of medical terminology, anatomy & physiology, fundamentals of disease processes, medical record content, & the standards of licensing, accrediting, & certifying agencies. It is usually performed by a qualified medical record practitioner. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Qualitative research is a form of inquiry that analyzes information conveyed through language and behavior in natural settings.1 It is used to capture expressive information not conveyed in quantitative data about beliefs, values, feelings, and motivations that underlie behaviors. Qualitative methods derive from a variety of disciplines and traditions.2 They are used to learn directly from patients and others what is important to them, to provide the context necessary to understand quantitative findings, and to identify variables important for future clinical studies. Although qualitative inquiry has been championed as a way of “reaching the parts other methods cannot reach,”3 it is also distrusted by some because it rarely provides a generalizable foundation for clinical decisions and policies.4 Readers are referred to several recent editorials for overviews of these differences and proposals for their reconciliation. |
|
|
