1) Greeting & Introduction

• Greet
• Stand
• Define
• Repeat stand
  "..in the interests of people and the Internet itself"

• Greet Chairperson, judges, ladies and gentlemen
• State team's stand - my team argues for stricter Internet censorship
• Define motion's wording:
  Def. of Internet: the Internet is a global computer network with a diversity of information and communication facilities
  Def. of censorship: the practice of officially examining and supressing unacceptable parts of content
  Def. of Internet censorship: Internet censorship controls what can be accessed and published on the Internet
• Repeat team's stand
  We believe there should be stricter Internet censorship in the interests of people and the Internet itself

2) Depict outline

• Me: Internet censorship creates a better world by curbing cybercrime
• Joshua: "..show how Internet censorship restricts pornography access"
• Jun Kiat: "..will talk about online terrorism"
• Lastly, David will reiterate our points to show that stricter Internet censorship is positive and the motion should stand

1. I'll go on to explain how Internet censorship creates a better world by curbing cybercrime
2. Secondly, Joshua will show how Internet censorship restricts pornography access
3. Thirdly, Jun Kiat will talk about online terrorism
4. Lastly, David will reiterate out points to show that stricter Internet censorship is positive and the motion should stand

3) Point(s)

1. Advancements in techonology have proven success in curbing cybercrime

Cybercrime - whereby the tools on the Internet are misused to serve criminals

• Piracy is an example
  Digital technology allows easy copying of products like music,
  and the Internet anonymously transmits such content globally
• Evidence is able to support Internet censorship's effectiveness in combacting cybercrime through means like
  1) ceasing copy-right infriging websites
  2) filtering uploads
  3) monitering activity
  FOR INSTANCE, the file-hosting service Megaupload was shut down by the United States government in March 2005 over copyright infrigment

4) Counter-argument (in advance) & Summary statement

• Privacy issues?
  What I can say: does the interest outweight the cons?

Should the opposition argue that these measures are negative by invading peoples' privacy,

ask yourself: does the interest of saving people from minor privacy issues outweight the interest of protecting a whole nation?

Next speaker: Joshua - will talk about p. access.
Thank you/ Cheers.