Term
|
Definition
Says that Section 5 does not apply to transactions by anyone other than issuer, underwriter, or dealer.
The central transaction exemption |
|
|
Term
The purpose of Rule 144 is: |
|
Definition
to provide objective criteria for determining that the person selling securities the public has NOT acquired them from the issuer for distribution. |
|
|
Term
Less Obvious Benefits of Going Public |
|
Definition
- Decreased borrowing costs (raising $$ through debt = a fixed obligation to pay to people)
- Opportunity for insiders to realize value created (sell your shares)
- Easier to design compensation packages (can offer stock options to attract people) |
|
|
Term
What does the JOBS Act do? |
|
Definition
Purpose: to reduce costs of being a public company
- exempts EGC's from some requirements that apply to public companies
* ECG = more than $1Billion in annual revenues and public float of $700 million or less
Basically all fall into this - so not realy a protection for smaller co's. |
|
|
Term
Alternative Explanations for Less IPOs Happening |
|
Definition
- Pre-2000 figures are artificially inflated bc of 1990s boom in IPOs
- IPOs come in waves; we're in a trough
- Smaller, stand alone co's less viable than the used to be
- Now, value-maximizing growth strategy is to sell to a larger company (which can integrate new tech into related products)
- Private placements are better subtitutes
- It's not the cost of being a public co, but the UNDERWRITING costs in an IPO that matter |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Main thing: for any offer or sale of securities, you must register with the SEC or find an exemption
Based on a theory of disclosure
5(a): Can't sell or deliver securities during the waiting period
5(b)(1): any "prospectus" [written doc "offer"ing sale] must satisfy Section 10 reqs
5(c): pre-filing period |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Registration statement must include Schedule A items, except as SEC says
|
|
|
Term
Section 10(a)(4) of the 33 Act |
|
Definition
SEC authority over what has to be disclosed in the prospectus |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Special powers of commission - SEC has authority to make rules/regulations applicable to the registration statement and prospectus |
|
|
Term
Two Broad Buckets of Information: |
|
Definition
1) About the REGISTRANT (our business, our revenues, exec comp, litigation, property)
2) About the TRANSACTION (how much we're selling, common/debt/etc, underwriters) |
|
|
Term
If you violate Section 5, |
|
Definition
any purchaser has the right to obtain recision of the securities. (12(a)(1) - strict liability provision
basically, the issuer becomes the guarantor against market losses for a year after the offering. |
|
|
Term
Delaying Amendment: Section 8(a) + Rule 473 |
|
Definition
8(a) says that reg statements automatically become effective 20 days after filing - restarted if an amendment is filed.
Rule 473 uses the amendment language to require a provision in every reg statement that automatically amends |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Permits registration statement to go effective without price and size info
Info must be made available in a prospectus supplement within 15 days of effective date |
|
|
Term
Acceleration: Rule 461
(+ Sec 8(a) as stat. basis)
and
Bases for Denying Acceleration
(strings attached to this powerful SEC tool) |
|
Definition
Avoids having to wait 20 days after making any changes to the reg statement (at SEC discretion)
Bases for Denying - 461(b):
- Insufficient circulation of prospectus
- Failure to comply w/ plain English rules
- Insufficient correction of misleading prelim prospectus
- SEC investigation of issuer, controlling persons, UW |
|
|
Term
Section 5(c)
and
Three issues with Pre-filing |
|
Definition
5(c) prohibits all offers and sales (oral/written) before registration is filed with the SEC.
When is a company "in registration?"
What constitutes an "offer or sale"?
What kind of issuer is involved? |
|
|
Term
What's an "OFFER"?
(Gun-jumping) |
|
Definition
Section 2(a)(3): "every attempt or offer to dispose of, or solicitation of an offer to buy"
Gun-jumping is when you try to prep/condition the market ("whet the appetite" of investors)
|
|
|
Term
Rule 169, SAFE HARBOR from 5(c) "Regularly Released Business Info"
|
|
Definition
- Available to non-reporting issuers
- Info released by or on behalf of issuer
- Info looks like past releases, intended for customers/suppliers/etc, not just investors -169(d)
- NO INFO about registered offering itself
Forward-looking info NOT covered by 169
|
|
|
Term
Rule 168, SAFE HARBOR from 5(c), Regularly Released Factual & Forward-Looking Business Info |
|
Definition
- Reporting Issuers
- NOT available if part of a "scheme" to evade 5(c) requirements
- Info released by or on behalf of issuer
- Info must be regularly released
- NO info about registered offering itself
|
|
|
Term
Who can put out Rule 169 Forward-Looking info? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
30 Day Bright Line Safe Harbor - Rule 163A |
|
Definition
Any communication (oral/written) more than 30 days before FILING the registration statement is excluded from definition of "OFFER"
3 Conditions:
- Must not reference offering
- Made by or on behalf of issuers
- Issuer must take reasonable steps to prevent futher publication/distr of communication during 30 day period
Available for reporting and non-reporting
|
|
|
Term
When are you "in registration"? |
|
Definition
At minimum: when you reach an understanding with an underwriter - but could be earlier
Fuzzy analysis |
|
|
Term
Who can use the 163A 30 Day Safe Harbor? |
|
Definition
Reporting AND non-reporting issuers
Main thing: communication must NOT reference the offering |
|
|
Term
Rule 135 Safe Harbor for Notices |
|
Definition
- Must include a legend saying notice does not constitute an offer or sale
- May only disclose issuer name, basic info about securities (not price), anticipated timing, brief statement
- May NOT name underwriters
basically, issuer can give some bare bones info to let market know the offering is coming |
|
|
Term
Confidential Registration Statements |
|
Definition
Emerging Growth Companies may confidentially submit draft reg statements to SEC for review
Initial confidential submission + amendments must be filed 21 days before road show (or expected offering date if no road show) --> Prof: so I don't know what purpose this serves/what its effect will be |
|
|
Term
Emerging Growth Companies |
|
Definition
- can file confidential reg statements with SEC
- can communicate with potential investor QIBs and AIs in the pre-filing period - Sec. 5(d)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Section 2(a)(10): basically any written doc (or radio/tv) offering the sale of securities
Unless it's carved out in 2(a)(10)(b) - if it states how to obtain a prospectus, and does not more than identify the security, state the price, issuer (tombstone ad), or whatever else the SEC wants to carve out. |
|
|
Term
Section 5(b) + The defintion of "prospectus" |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
ATTACK: Does a communication violate Section 5? |
|
Definition
Do any safe harbors apply?
- Was it 30 days before filing the registration statement? (Issuer only; not avail to prospective UWs) See 163A
- Is it a pre-filing public notice of the offering? See 135
- Is it a reporting company making a factual business communication consistent with past releases? See 168 or 169
- Is it a tombstone ad, press release announcing the offering, or a return card to indicate interest? See 134
|
|
|
Term
Rule 134: "Identifying Statements" |
|
Definition
Not a prospectus => exempt from restrictions applicable to written offers
- Available only after reg statement and prelim prospectus has been filed (during waiting period, post-filing period)
-
- Examples: tombstone-like ad; indicator card (with a restrictive legend saying there is no commitment to buy if returned); could be a website posting/email
|
|
|
Term
QUESTION: What is the difference between a FWP and a RUle 134 Post-filing communication? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Section 5 Post-filing Requirements: |
|
Definition
5(b)(2): delivery requirement - when you deliver the securities, it has to be accompanied by a final prospectus |
|
|
Term
Free Writing Prospectus Examples |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
SUMMARY ATTACK: Approaching an Offering Question |
|
Definition
1) Is it a registered offering?
2) What stage of the process are we in?
3) What kind of issuer are we talking about?
4) Who is taking the action? |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Class 9 Post-filing Slides - 173, 172 etc. |
|
|
Term
How Long Does the Prospectus Delivery Requirement Last? |
|
Definition
- The Issuer, UW/Dealer selling original allotment: never has an exemption and always has to deliver a final prospectus
- After public distribution, Dealers see 174(f) and 4(3)C:
- 90 DAYS if it's the issuer's first registered offering
- 40 DAYS if it's not
- 0 days if issuer was a reporting company
|
|
|
Term
Intrastate Offer Exemption - 147 |
|
Definition
- Theoretically no limit on size/$$
Residency : ALL offers must be to residents; residency = state of principal office/state of principal residence
Resale: Must "COME TO REST" before resale
Non-integration window of 6 months before/ after offering |
|
|
Term
To use the Intrastate Offer Exemption, Issuer must: |
|
Definition
- Be incorporated/organized in that state
- Have its principal office there
- 80% of its revenues from biz in the state
- 80% of its assets in the state
- intent to use 80% of proceeds for biz in the state
|
|
|
Term
The Statutory Basis for Reg D |
|
Definition
3(b)(1) permits SEC to exempt any offering of less than $5mil ==> Rules 504 ($1mil) and 505 ($5mil)
4(a)(2) exempts private placements ==> Rule 506 (unlimited) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Huge advantage: NO DISCLOSURE doc to investors
Can offer to anyone - investor sophistication is irrelevant!
Offering size: $1M
(crowdfunding exemption coming up will make this less used) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
No disclosure - if all investors are accredited
No sophistication standard for investors (but disclosure required if not all accredited)
No more than 35 unaccredited
|
|
|
Term
Why does it not make sense to have a general solicitation ban in 504? |
|
Definition
Statutory premise for 504/505: 3b1 is NOT a private placement exemption, just "we want to carve out these small offerings to reduce capital for small co's"
So why can't you have general solicitation in a 504/505 offering? |
|
|
Term
JOBS Act and 506 General Solicitations (final rule not adopted yet) |
|
Definition
You can do general solicitations in 506 offerings, as long as all purchasers are accredited investors (permits offers to unaccredited as long as actual purchasers are accredited)
Issuer must take reasonable steps to verify accreditedness |
|
|
Term
General solicitation in Reg D |
|
Definition
No general solicitation in 505/506 (and most 504s)
Examples: mass mailings, internet postings, etc.
Allowed: Notice that's like a notice of a registered offering
Allowed: Communications pursuant to a pre-existing R bt issuer/broker and purchaser (a pre-existing R theoretically lets broker/issuer evaluate whether investment is suitable for P)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Basically: Does the amount to be financed in a 12 month period exceed the 504 or 505 dollar limit?
Cap is calculated by aggregating the offering price of all securities sold relying on any 3(b) exemption - 504, 505, Reg A + anything in violation of Section 5 requirements (like if you have a failed 506 offering) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
6 month window for Reg D - 502(a)
Five factor test; then treat the two transactions as if they were ONE
Consequence? --> everyone who bought in BOTH transactions has right of recision.
If you structured all your transactions under 506 and ONLY sold to AIs, integration would not be an issue. |
|
|