Term
|
Definition
- answers a question
- adds to existing knowledge
- not meant to solve problems
- no direct practical application
- can be used to develop theories
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Purpose is to solve a problem
- or to provide practical application
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- random assignment of particpants to groups
- conditions are manipulated by researcher
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- no randomization
- control group or multiple measurements (on the same group/person)
- assess differences across groups
- across time
- across different tasks
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- no comparisons or
- no manipulation of conditions
- can be qualitative
|
|
|
Term
Types of non-experimental research |
|
Definition
- case studies
- ethnographic studies (groups of people)
- Historical design - use existing data
- Correlational designs - look for relationships
- Surveys
- Developmental - change over time
- longitunidal
- cross-sectional
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- form of non-experimental
- "variety of analytic procedures designed to systematically collect and describe authentic, contextualized social phenomena with the goal of interpretive adequacy"
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Test of specific ideas, usually experimental
- numbers, statistical analysis important
- used to answer specific questions
- Hypotheses guide the research design
|
|
|
Term
Qualitative Research
(characteristics) |
|
Definition
- exploration of topics, ideas, insights
- Numbers/stats not as important
- used to answer general questions, in-depth exploration
- findings lead to hypotheses
|
|
|
Term
List of types of research |
|
Definition
- Quantitative
- Qualitative
- Basic
- Applied
- Experimental
- Quasi-experimental
- Non-experimental
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Concept with quantitaive or qualitative value (not a constant)
Ex.
- age
- sex
- diagnosis
- score of Goldman-Fristoe
- IQ score
- Reaction Time
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- selected or manipulated by investigator
- fixed: what the participant brings (age, education, severity, type, etc)
- Manipulated: type of treatment, assignment to groups
- Planned by the investigator
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Focus of scientific observation
- values depend on the experimental manipulation
- Perceent intelligibility (DV) using a letter board vs. no letter board (IV)
- Number of requests (DV) by children with an without autism (IV)
- DV is what the particpant does
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Everything else that could possibly affect the results of an experiment
- Can be nuisance variables
|
|
|
Term
Examples of extraneous variables |
|
Definition
- Demographics
- age, education, gender, SES, family environment
- Clinical
- severity of SLI, time since stroke
- Methodological
- order of test presentation
- testing site (at home, in lab, at school)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Inclusion criteria
- based on the research question
- no variability across participants
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Required to descirbe measurement and manipulation of variables
- identifying particiants
- defining categorical variables
- defining treatment
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- data - information collected and coded
- reliability of data collected
- must be objective and repeatable
|
|
|
Term
Ways to make collected data objective/repeatable |
|
Definition
- Blinding
- minimize patient and researcher bias
- participant doesn't know if s/he's getting treatment or not
- researcher assessing results doesn't know which participants are getting treatment
- Inter-observer reliability
- measure consistency of observations
- different people assess data
- score tests, code transcripts, rate intelligibility
|
|
|
Term
Research Design
Definition
What it involves |
|
Definition
- blueprint for study
- participants
- variables
- implementation (methods)
- collecting data
- ethics of project
- Developed in concert with research question and hypothesis
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- will answer the research question/s
- control for extraneous variables
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- random sampling
- convenience sampling
- representative sample
- large enough to answer the question (power)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Single group design
- 2-group design
- Complex design
- Factorial design
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- one group, multiple conditions/tests
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- 2 groups compared on same condition/treatment
- parallel - groups always the same
- cross-over design - groups participate in each condition (groups serve as own controls)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- 3+ group design
- 3 or more groups
- compared on multiple conditions
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Equivalence of groups
- random assignment
- block-randomization
- stratified randomization
- matching
|
|
|
Term
Single case designs (not case studies!) |
|
Definition
- manipulate conditions
- compare participant to him/herself in different conditions
- no control group
- baseline phase is critical
|
|
|
Term
Types of single case designs |
|
Definition
- A-B-A Design
- A-B-A-C design
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- A - baseline
- B - intervention/treatment
- A - second baseline (withdrawal)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- A - baseline
- B - first intevertion/treatment
- A - second baseline (withdrawal)
- C - second intervention/treatment
|
|
|
Term
Multiple baseline single case study |
|
Definition
- multiple baselines - for each different variable
- Treat different variables in succession
|
|
|
Term
Internal Validity
Definition |
|
Definition
- "the degree to which the relationship between the IV and DV is observed without the influence of extraneous variables"
- data collected reflects the influence of the experimental manipulation, not something else
|
|
|
Term
Types of threats to internal validity |
|
Definition
- Ambiguous temporal precedence
- Differential Selection
- History
- Maturation effects
- Statistical regression
- Attrition
- Multiple test effects
- Instrumentation effects
- Additive and interaction effects
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Ambiguous temporal precedence |
|
Definition
Did the treatment/environment/study really come first? or was the change present before the treatment/environment/study? |
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Differential Selection |
|
Definition
- Groups aren't really equivalent
- extraneous variable might be influencing the DV
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
History |
|
Definition
OUtside events occurring during the study that might affect the DV
- Specific historical event or chain of events
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Maturation effects |
|
Definition
- changes in a person over time that might affect DV
- general changes in a person; specific to that person
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Statistical regression |
|
Definition
- over time, extreme scores will move (regress) towards the mean
- Statistical - affects groups that are non-randomly selected and with imperfect correlations
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Attrition |
|
Definition
- over time, participants will drop out of the study
- characteristics of drop-outs may be important
- differential attrition may be important
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Multiple test effects |
|
Definition
- repeated administration of same test
- practice effect - scores increase
- novelty effect - wears off; scores decrease
- test anxiety - may increase or decrease
|
|
|
Term
Threats to internal validity:
Instrumentation effects |
|
Definition
- changes in instruments (devices) over time
- wear and tear
- audiometers get out of calibration
- Changes in human (researcher) performance
- becomes faster, more efficient with data collection over time
- become more accurate with transcribing or coding over time
- change definition of codes over time
|
|
|
Term
Types of External Validity |
|
Definition
- Accessible vs. target population
- "convience sample"
- Description of independent variable
- multiple treatment interference effect
- novelty
- disruption effect
- experimenter effects
- pre-test and post-test sensitizing effects
- measurement of DV
|
|
|
Term
External Validity
Definition |
|
Definition
- Population validity: generalization to other people (generalize from sample to population)
- Ecological validity: generalization to other settings/environments (outside the lab)
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Accessible vs. target populations |
|
Definition
- Convenience sample may not be representative
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Description of IV |
|
Definition
- enough detail for replication is necessary
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Multiple treatment interference effects |
|
Definition
- second treatment/task may be influenced by first
- ex. Participants receive 2 weeks of cycles treatment followed by 2 weeks of minimal pairs treatment
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Novelty effect |
|
Definition
- a new treatment appears to work better simply because it is new (exciting and interesting)
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Disruption effect |
|
Definition
- new treatment doesn't work as well because the experimenter is not well versed in administering it
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Experimenter effects |
|
Definition
- behaviors differ across participants/testing sessions
- ex. more positive, more feedback, more interactive
- appearance influences performance
- observations or data recording differs
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Pre-test and post-test sensitizing effects |
|
Definition
- exposure to the tests affects performance
|
|
|
Term
Threats to external validity:
Measurement of DV |
|
Definition
- operationalization of DV
- ex. DV - improved expressive langauge - what does this mean?
- fluency?
- words per minute? content units per minute?
- syntactic structure?
- sentence length?
|
|
|