Term
|
Definition
definition of a variable in terms of the activities/variables/operations the researcher uses to measure or manipulate |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
variable you manipulate or change (manipulate the independent loner) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the variable being studied/measured, (the control) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-categories, categorizing, not numbers separated into groups -Gender (all IV's) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-scale in which objects or individuals are categorized by rank -places in a race, class rankings |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-numbers on the scale are all equal in size identity, magnitude and equal unit met -Likert rating scales, most psychological scales |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Absolute Zero is possible -height, weight, age, time |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Data measured at interval or ratio levels -average of the distribution -Not too much skew or outliers |
|
|
Term
(Central tendency) Median |
|
Definition
-data measured on ordinal scale -mean is not valid -the middle score of distribution after scores have been arranged lowest to highest or vice versa |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Nominal Data -score that occurs with the greatest frequency |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Middle of whole distribution |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-the extent to which the results can be generalized -Diverse sample increases it |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-the peak is to the left and the tail is to the right -Report Median, Minimum, and Maximum |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-the peak is to the right and the tail is to the left -Report Median, Minimum, and Maximum |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Report M and SD -Normal curve: symmetrical, bell-shaped frequency representing normal distribution -(mean, median, mode are equal in the center, only one mode, observations clustered in center) |
|
|
Term
(Types of Design) Correlation |
|
Definition
-(Pearson Correlation, must be interval or ratio data) -Any relation, no manipulation |
|
|
Term
(Type of Design) Descriptive |
|
Definition
-Gathering data ex. survey |
|
|
Term
(Type of Design) Experimental (Simple) |
|
Definition
-1 IV with 2 levels -run independent samples t test -The assumptions of the independent samples t test are that the IV is nominal and dichotomous (2 levels) -The DV is always interval or ratio -The levels are independent from each other -Advantage – Random assignment -Limitation – Confounds, other things playing an effect other then the IV |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Rejection of null hypothesis. p<.05 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Retain null hypothesis. p>.05 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
What you want to reject. (key words: “no diff”, “not) |
|
|
Term
Alternate Hypothesis (Directional & Non-Directional) |
|
Definition
-Predicts what you hope to find -Directional Hypothesis: -predict direction “_____will increase_____” -Non-Directional: -predict a difference (more general) "_____will have a relationship with______" |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Outside influences (outside the study) -Sometimes use MATCH design to get around confounding variables -Ex. Being hungry, tired, angry, etc. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Within the design of the study -Pilot study – ask other if the study asks what needs to be asked -Threats – not measuring what needs to be measured Strong internal validity, the variables are reliable, measures are -Ex. Use Crombach’s Alpha, want to be equal or above .7 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Getting means and standard deviations -See the differences within the stats, but don’t know if the difference is significantly significant -Analyze – Descriptive Frequencies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Can now get the information about significant significance -Correlation, t test, ANOVA -Gives p value (Sig.) |
|
|
Term
Increase Power (Effect Size) |
|
Definition
-Ability to detect a difference in the DV based on the manipulation of the IV -Increase: Get rid of confounds Strong manipulation of the IVs, use more extremes of the variables Increase participants Decrease within group means |
|
|
Term
Between (or treatment) variance-difference between the groups |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Within groups (or error) variance – differences between individuals within one group |
|
Definition
-Want to be a low -If you have a high number, this could mean that there are other variables (confounds) effecting the results |
|
|
Term
Statistical Significance testing (including what impacts the likelihood of statistical significance and what p < .05 means) |
|
Definition
-Inferential Statistics Correlation, t test, ANOVA Gives p value (Sig.) p < .05 – Significant difference between the groups p > .05 – No Significant difference between the groups |
|
|
Term
Effect size (proportion of variance accounted for), rpb2, eta2 |
|
Definition
–percentage of effect that is directly attributed to the IV manipulation -Ex. If the rpb2 is .32 or 32% then it can be said that of everything that could effect math scores, 32% of the effect is directly due to the type of music the participant listened to. The other 68% percent of the effect on math score is due to other reasons. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Difference between the groups, just because it is statistical significant it might not be practically significant, the effect size could be large or small -p < .05 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-In the real World, Does it matter? Does it make a difference? -Will have practical significance when there is statistical significance and a high value effect size. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-How much of effect that is directly attributed to the IV manipulation? -Want to be large -Ex. How much of the effect on math scores in directly due to manipulation of music |
|
|
Term
(Type of Design) Experimental (multi-group multi-level) |
|
Definition
-1 IV with more than 2 levels -run one way ANOVA, if significant difference run post hoc (LSD) -Advantage – Random assignment -Limitation – Confounds, other things playing an effect other then the IV |
|
|
Term
(Type of Design) Experimental (Dependent) |
|
Definition
–Advantages – Less worries of confounds, more control over outside influences -Match Design Matched on a characteristic (age, score, gender, etc.) with another, then paired, then doing a dependent samples t test on that pair based on -Limitation – Mortality/Attrition, if you us lose one participant in a group you lose the whole group (match) -Repeated/Within Design Participants receive all conditions in random order -Limitations – Mortality/Attrition, participant may not come back for repeated study, study may take a lot of time to complete. |
|
|