Term
|
Definition
- An association of people who share certain political goals
- Pressure groups seek either to defend or futher interests of a paticular section of society or to promote a particular cause or issue
- They do not seek governmental power, but merely to influence the political system
- They seek to mobilise as wide a level of support as possible
|
|
|
Term
Sectional Pressure Groups |
|
Definition
- Represent a section of society
- Only intereseted in the interests of that group and have narrow goals
- E.G. Confederation of British Industry (CBI), National Union of Students (NUS), British Bankers' Association (BBA)
|
|
|
Term
Promotional Pressure Groups |
|
Definition
- Pursue an issue or a cause
- They are open to all members of the community and are altruistic
- They believe that their cause or issue will benefit the community
- E.G. Friends of the Earth (FoE), Unlock Democracy, Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Pressure groups that have special connections with government and Parliament
- Direct access to decision-makers and are involved with the development of policy
- They are regularly consulted by ministers, civil servants and policy advisors
- Consulted by Parliamentary Committees
- Have representatives sitting on policy and advisory committees
- E.G. National Farmers Union (NFU), Royal Society for the Protection of Animals (RSPCA), Automobile Association (AA)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Do not have direcect acess to government or Parliament or Decision makers in general
- Possibly to maintain their independence or the decision makers do not wish to be associated with them
- Operate by Mobilising public support and put pressure on decision-makers
- Use direct action i.e. street demonstrations, publicity stunts
- Use media campaigns, the internet and social networks
- Use e-petitions
- e.g. Greenpeace, Animal Liberation front, Countryside Alliance
|
|
|
Term
Difference Between Pressure groups and parties |
|
Definition
- Parties actively seek to gain governmental power or a share of power, wheras groups do not seek power
- Parties must develop policies across the full range of government business; pressure groups have narrow goals normally concentrating on one isue or the narrow interests of one group
- Parties have to make themselves accountable for their policies, pressure groups do not
- Parties normally have a formal organisation, pressure groups may be formally organised, but sare often very loose organisations
|
|
|
Term
Similarities between Parties and Pressure Groups |
|
Definition
- Pressure groups sometimes put up candidates up for election in order to publicise their goals or ssue, bt does not mean they seek power, merely influence
- Some pressure groups develop a wide range of policies like parties e.g. Trade unions and the CBI
- Sometimes pressure groups transform themselves into parties there may be confusion over such transitional groups - e.g. The Green Party and UKIP
- Some pressure groups are very closely associated with parties, e.g. trade unions with Labour (less so now), Countryside Alliance and Conservatives
|
|
|
Term
How Pressure groups enhance Pluralism |
|
Definition
- They dispese power and influence very widely (especially mass membership groups)
- They ensure that many groups are able to exert political influence
- They help to protect the interests of groups in society (sectional groups)
- They balance the power of centralised government
|
|
|
Term
How pressure groups enhance elitism |
|
Definition
- Some poweful wealthy, influential pressure groups may concentrate power in few hands (for example, large producer grups)
- Influential insider groups may seve to concentrate more power in government hands
- Some pressure groups may be led by unaccountable elites
- Some groups may hold a disproportionate amount of power
|
|
|
Term
Why are pressure groups becoming more important? |
|
Definition
- Membership of, and identification with, political parties is declining. Pressure group activity has replaced this, to some extent.
- Arguably the electorate is now better informed and therefire more able to become involved in political issues
- The internet and new social made have made it more practicable to mount campaigns and initiate new associations
- Both the number of pressure groups and their memebership. Some groups have millions of members and supporters
- Society has become more pluralistic and fragmented into groups which have special interests. Refelected in the proliferation of interest groups.
- The political system is now more accessible to group activity, there are more points of access and politicians are more sensitive to public opinion
- Growing affluence means that the population have more interests and thus make more demands on the politcal system
|
|
|
Term
Methods used by pressure groups |
|
Definition
- Lobbying ministers - Insiders feel they can influence decisions and policy - e.g. CBI
- Sitting on advisory and policy committees in governent - They can supply specialist information and advice - British Medical Association
- Lobbying EU institutions - Most of their concers are under the jurisdiction of the EU - National Farmers' Union
- Organising mass publc demonstrations - They have widespread support but are outsiders - Stop the war campaign
- Media Campaigns - Celebrities are involved and th issue captures the public imagination - Justice for Ghurkas campaign
- Civil disobedience - Outsider groups need to attract publicity - Green Peace
- Internet Campaigns - Probably issues that appeal mostly to the young - Friends of the earth
- Action through law courts - The rights of members are threatened - Trade unions
|
|
|
Term
Reasons for Pressure group success |
|
Definition
- Resources - Financial and organisational, giving a group the ability and people to mount a major campaign e.g. The countryside Alliance organised mass demonstratons in London and Anti-foc hunting legislation was sucessfully watered down in 2004
- Insider Status - being established in government circles and well trusted e.g. ASH, a series of pieces of legislation were intorduced to deter and reduce smoking
- Lack of opposition - Make poverty history in 1900s and 200s, experienced little opposition to its championing of developing countris, governments raised heir commitments to foreign debt relief and increased overseas aid
- Tactics - groups may find a good formula for influening government and mobilising public suppor e.g. Save England's forests used a variety of tactics, including a huge e-petition ceberity campaigners, demonstrations and MP involvement and plans to sell of large quantities of publicly owned forest in 2010 were cancelled
|
|
|
Term
Examples of Pressure Groups |
|
Definition
- British Bankers' Association - Sectional - Insider - Concentrates power - Lobbying Ministers
- Greenpeace - Promotional - Outsider - Disperse Power - Direct action, Civil Disobidience
- Liberty - Promotional - Outsider - Disperse power - Media Campaigns
- Countryside Alliance - Sectional - Outsider - Disperse ower - Media Campaigns, public demonstrations , civil disobedience
- Institute of Directors - Sectional - Insider - Concentrate Power - Lobbying, advisory committees
|
|
|
Term
Ways in which pressure groups enhance democracy |
|
Definition
- Act as a a form of representation, represent areas of society that may be ignored by political parties
- They help to disperse power more widely, preventing dangerous concentrations of power
- They help to educate and inform the public about important issues
- They may help the governing process by providing informed advice - insider pressure groups
- Provide ways in which people can participate in politics, especially with the decline in traditional forms of participation
- Provide an outlet for public grievance - a process known as 'tension release'
|
|
|
Term
Ways in which pressure groups do not support democracy |
|
Definition
- They can undermine the authority of elected officials and Parliament
- They can be seen as representing the 'politics of self-interest' and may present the public with biased or even false information
- If they are too powerful, they may create 'hyper pluralism' which can hold up the process of government by being too obstructive
- Pressure groups lack elective legitimacy and are not democratically accountable
- Those that engage in civil disobedience threaten orer in society and subvert democracy
|
|
|