Term
|
Definition
Statements that cannot possibly be true. e.g. p & -p, 1=0 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Statements that are always true. e.g. p or –p, 1+1=2 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Statements that may or may not be true depending on how the world actually is. E.g. p, p --> q,…. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An argument is deductively valid if and only if it is (logically) impossible that its conclusion is false while its premises are true. |
|
|
Term
All flurgs are turvy This is a flurg -- This is turvy |
|
Definition
valid purely in virtue of form |
|
|
Term
Papa Smurf if blue -- Papa Smurf is coloured |
|
Definition
valid in virtue of their content (as well as their form) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An argument is inductively strong if and only if it is improbable that its conclusions are false given that its premises are true (and it is not deductively valid). |
|
|
Term
The moon is square -- Therefore the moon has four corners. |
|
Definition
Unjustified premise - Justification requires good reasoning and justified premises |
|
|
Term
The moon is round -- Therefore the moon is white |
|
Definition
Bad reasoning – the conclusion can be false while the premise(s) are true |
|
|
Term
If P then Q P -- Therefore Q |
|
Definition
Valid.
Conditional Arguments - Affirming the antecedent |
|
|
Term
If P then Q Q -- Therefore P |
|
Definition
Invalid.
Conditional Arguments - Affirming the consequent |
|
|
Term
If P then Q -P -- Therefore Q |
|
Definition
Invalid.
Conditional Arguments - Denying the antecedent |
|
|
Term
If P then Q -Q -- Therefore -P |
|
Definition
Valid.
Conditional Arguments - Denying the consequent |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
There is no good reason to think that the past will resemble the future. |
|
|
Term
Responses to the Problem of Induction |
|
Definition
1. Circular reasoning is okay. 2. Using induction is part of the meaning of ‘rational’. 3. Pragmatic vindication – if anything will work, induction will. 4. We don’t need induction, just falsification (Popper). |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A hypothesis designed to fit a piece of data. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A (non-analytic) sentence is meaningful if only if there is a procedure that would determine whether it is true or false. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Science proceeds not by confirming theories, but by falsifying them. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A theory is scientific if and only if it is falsifiable. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A sentence is scientific if and only if it is testable. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The degrees of belief of actual agents. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the degrees of belief that an agent ought to have. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the probability of an attribute A in a finite reference class B is the relative frequency of actual occurrences of A within B. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Probability is propensity / disposition / tendency of a certain experimental setup to produce a certain result. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
If A and B are mutually exclusive, then P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) – P(A and B) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
If A and B are not correlated, then P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B). -- P(A and B) = P(A|B) * P(B) -- P(B|A) = P(A and B) / P(A) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A is correlated with B if and only if the proportion of A among those with B is greater than the proportion of A among those without B. |
|
|
Term
confidence interval for the frequency of the value in the population: Sample size of 250. f(R) = 0.56 |
|
Definition
The margin of error for 250 is +- 0.06, so: P(R) = 0.56 +-0.06 |
|
|
Term
60-70% of the red marbles in the population are large, which doesn’t overlap with the 25-35% of the non-red marbles in the population are large |
|
Definition
evidence for a correlation in the population |
|
|
Term
Causation - Constant conjunction |
|
Definition
A causes B = Events of type A are constantly conjoined with events of type B. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Where A and B are actual events, A causes B = If A were not to occur, then B would not occur = In the closest world in which not A, not B |
|
|