Term
Bedau compares capital punishment to: |
|
Definition
self defense for the individual |
|
|
Term
what does the self defense rule say? |
|
Definition
deadly force is justified only to prevent loss of life in immediate jeopardy where lesser force cannot be expected to save the life that is threatened. |
|
|
Term
According to Bedau, more violence than is necessary to save the life is not: |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
What are Bedau's two moral principles? |
|
Definition
1) If a life is to be risked, better the life of the guilty than one who is not the initial assailant. 2.) Taking of life deliberately is not justified if there is a reasonable alternative. |
|
|
Term
According to Bedau, does he think that punishment prevents crimes only by incapacitation or deterrence? |
|
Definition
Yes, but he also notes there are also other means to prevent crime. |
|
|
Term
Whats the problem in killing murderers, to incapacitate them, according to bedau? |
|
Definition
There is no way to know which murderers will kill again. Only way to eliminate horrible crimes would be to execute anyone who might commit such crimes. |
|
|
Term
According to Bedau, if the justification for execution is deterrence, then: |
|
Definition
their is no measurable evidence that executions deter more than life in prison. |
|
|
Term
Psychologists have evidence that executions: |
|
Definition
actually incite unstable people to kill. |
|
|
Term
if one uses a utilitarian argument on the death penalty, what must be considered? |
|
Definition
cost of innocent people, as well as costs of capital trials and appeals. |
|
|
Term
Even if the death penalty was shown to be somewhat more effective at deterring murder than life in prison, what must we still remember according to bedau? |
|
Definition
we may execute some innocents since we only know what they have been declared guilty of. |
|
|
Term
what is one big problem with the death penalty according to bedau? |
|
Definition
is it moral to kill 1000 convicted people if that only saves on additional life? |
|
|
Term
According to Cassell what is the mass market version of the discrimantional practices of the death penalty? |
|
Definition
The death penalty discriminates against african americans ( higher percentage of african americans on death row than in general population. |
|
|
Term
According to cassell, if african americans are being discriminated against, what should we look at? |
|
Definition
we should look at percentage of murderers, not of general population |
|
|
Term
According to cassell, african americans getting the death penalty might be a matter of: |
|
Definition
sociology, not discrimination ( poverty, education, etc). |
|
|
Term
According to Cassel, black killers are: |
|
Definition
no more likely to receive death sentences than white killers, and black who kill white are more likely to be put to death |
|
|
Term
according to cassell, if one filters out spurious correlations: |
|
Definition
there is no discriminations. ie 85% of police officers killed are white. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
all people executed in 1999 were poor, high percentage of black killers of white, many mentally ill, some juveniles |
|
|
Term
according to stevenson, the legal system is flawed by various levels of discrimination between: |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
According to stevenson, the disparity between black and whites becomes : |
|
Definition
more at each level of law enforcment ( arrest, charges, conviction, incarceration) |
|
|
Term
Does the supreme court think there is racial bias? |
|
Definition
yes, but we must tolerate such bias for capital punishment, since this exists in all punishments. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1.) race of victim has effect on penalty. 2.) charges for a crime influenced by race 3.) numerous examples of obvious racist beliefs found in statements of law enforcement, prosecuters, judges, even public defenders. |
|
|
Term
according to warren, claims of moral rights depend on the: |
|
Definition
identification of moral community who have a duty to respect these rights mutually. |
|
|
Term
according to warren, what is one question you have to answer: |
|
Definition
who qualifies as a member of that community who possess full and equal rights? |
|
|
Term
According to warren, we must distinguish between: |
|
Definition
human in the moral sense from human in genetic sense, or we fall into question begging about abortion |
|
|
Term
according to warren potential to becoming human in the moral sense does not: |
|
Definition
does not equate with being human morally. |
|
|
Term
According to warren, the moral community consists of people, but: |
|
Definition
what defines who counts as a person. |
|
|
Term
according to warren, person does not equate to: |
|
Definition
being biologically human. |
|
|
Term
what does warren use as an example? |
|
Definition
An alien, and he usses it to show how we decide if an alien creature should be accorded full consideration by the moral community as a member, or treated as food? |
|
|
Term
according to warren there are: |
|
Definition
traits that seem to identify persons, if any being lacks all of these than it is certainly not a person |
|
|
Term
according to warren, genetic humanity is neither: |
|
Definition
sufficient nor necessary for establishing personhood, and thus a claim to full moral rights. |
|
|
Term
according to warren, people react to images of: |
|
Definition
late term fetuses due to appearance, but this does not give the fetus any moral status in a rational sense. |
|
|
Term
according to warren, having the potential to become a person may give us some reasons not to kill needlessly, |
|
Definition
but that does not give a right to life. |
|
|
Term
according to warren, even if a potential person has a prima facie right to life, such |
|
Definition
a right could not outweigh the rights of an actual person ( mother ) |
|
|
Term
According to warren, a woman: |
|
Definition
is clearly a person in the full moral sense; and thus her rights must always override whatever rights we wish to scribe to a being that is not a person. |
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, liberals say the deliberate killing of a human being is not wrong in itselfs; it is only killing humans that are: |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
According schwartz , liberals confuse : |
|
Definition
BEING as a person with FUNCTIONING as a person as this moment |
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, neither a sleeping person nor a being in the womb now display: |
|
Definition
the qualities of a functioning person, but they will in time. |
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, the fact that a being has not functioned as a person is: |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Schwartz: liberals point out, the sleeping person has the CAPACITY to function as a person, but |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, the basic inherent capacity to function as a person may be fully accessible, or it may be latent, as in comas, small children, or even new fetuses, but all are |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, lacking an ability to function as a person due to lack of : |
|
Definition
development does not show the being is not a person now; it is a developing person. |
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, even a zygote has all the inherent capacity to function as a person in the future, |
|
Definition
it is merely underdeveloped, so it also a person now. |
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, this identity is based on: |
|
Definition
the continuity of being, the continuum of essential structure, and a continuum of capacities |
|
|
Term
according to schwartz: since there is no morally relevant difference between any stage of functioning and it; |
|
Definition
the being is always a person |
|
|
Term
according to schwartz, there may be persons that are not humans, but |
|
Definition
being human is not just a biological category, being human is sufficient grounds for being a person |
|
|
Term
According to schwartz, there is no point |
|
Definition
in development where a being becomes a person, it is a person throughout development |
|
|