Term
|
Definition
any set of animals that is encountered by a capture is an incomplete count of the population |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
True population= sample/capture probability N=n/p hat |
|
|
Term
CMR-capture probability is constant over____ |
|
Definition
time, space, and among animals |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Abundance in the closed population during the study interval |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of capture/recapture occasions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of animals having unique capture history w |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of animals caught at marked at each capture occasion |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of marked animals at each capture occasion (RECAPTURES) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of distinct animals captured over the course of the study |
|
|
Term
Whats the problem with LP? |
|
Definition
closed pop assumption MARK will estimate this for open populations |
|
|
Term
What does Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) measure? |
|
Definition
survival, recapture, population estimate |
|
|
Term
What does dead recoveries measure? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
What does known fate and nest survival measure? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
link between CMR and survival analyses |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
probability an animal survives from time x to time y |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
obtained from re-encounters of live animals, potentially recaptured over several occasions
Same animal may appear multiple times in the data
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
10- not captured
11- captured/ dead/ emigrated |
|
|
Term
Cormack Jolly Seber Assumptions |
|
Definition
- Homogeneity of capture and survival probabilities for marked animals within each sample occasion
- Instantaneous recapture
- release Emigration is permanent
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
very important for game birds and trout and salmon only one recapture |
|
|
Term
Dead Recoveries difference from CJS |
|
Definition
no need to calculate recapture probabilities and need estimate of prob of tag recovery |
|
|
Term
Dead recovery analysis requires the following |
|
Definition
—2 periods (2 years recommended)
—5 or more releases followed by recoveries |
|
|
Term
Dead Recoveries
R denotes
mij denotes
f denotes
|
|
Definition
R denotes sample of tagged animals
mij denotes released in period i and recovered in period j
f tag recovery rate (depends on which case)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Case 1: when hunters shoot and retrieve banded birds
|
|
|
Term
Case: (1-S)(1-r); where (1-S) is probability of mortality and (1-r) is the probability of finding and reporting |
|
Definition
Case 2. In many banding studies, marked animals are found dead and then reported |
|
|
Term
Case 1. Dead recoveries notation
Released --> killed, and reported---> ??? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Case 1. Dead Recoveries
Released---> survives to next banding period---> |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Case 1. Dead Recoveries
Released---> killed and not reported OR died---> |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Case 2.Dead Recoveries
Released--->survives to next banding period----> |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Case 2.Dead Recoveries
Released--->killed retrieved and reported----> |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Case 2.Dead Recoveries
Released--->killed and not reported or died----> |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Dead Recoveries Assumptions |
|
Definition
—Marking is representative of the population of interest
—No tag loss
—Tags are correctly recorded during banding and reporting
—Fates of tagged animals are independent
—*Homogeneity of survival and recovery probabilities for marked animals within parameter of interest
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Lincoln peterson model is the earliest for of what theory? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
it's a cmr model used for looking for carcasses or only one recapture event |
|
|