Term
|
Definition
1. Epidemiology is the study of how disease is distributed in populations and the factors that influence or determine the distribution. 2. Disease is not distributed randomly: there are measureable factors that influence the patterns and causes of disease in a population. 3. Disease causation is multifactorial: many factors work together to create an environment in which disease occurs, and identifying and measuring the relative contribution of these factors is a central focus of epidemiology. 4. epidemiology is about population-level (vs. individual) patterns of disease. 5. epidemiology is done by studying samples of larger populations: much of epi's statistical toolkit is focused on drawing inferences from samples back to populations. 6. measurement (of disease states, exposure, populations) is central to the practice of epidemiology. 7. epidemiology is fundamentally about comparisons across time, space, social groups, disease conditions, etc. 8. descriptive epidemiology is the study of the amount and distribution of disease within a population: tools are surveillance and vital statistics, with ongoing data collection often a component, and are conducted mainly by federal, state, and health agencies. 9. analytic epidemiology is the study of determinants of disease or reasons for relatively high or low frequency in specific groups: tools are focused investigations, data collection is to test a hypothesis, and is conducted by health agencies and academic researchers. 10. Incidence is the number of new cases of a disease among those at risk for developing the disease during a specified time period; prevalence is the number of cases present in the population at a specified time. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The study of how disease is distributed in populations and the factors that influence or determine this distribution. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Disease is not randomly distributed: There are measureable factors that influence the patterns and causes of disease in a population. |
|
|
Term
Multifactorial disease causation |
|
Definition
A multitude of factors conspire to create an environment in which disease occurs. Identifying and measuring the relative contribution of these factors is a central focus of epidemiology. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Epidemiology is about population-level (vs. individual) patterns of disease |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Epidemiology is done by studying samples of larger populations, and much of the statistical toolkit of epidemiology is focused on drawing inferences from samples back to populations. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Measurement of disease states, exposure, populations, is central to the practice of epidemiology. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Epidemiology is fundamentally about comparisons across time, space, social groups, disease conditions. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The study of the amount and distribution of disease within a population.
Tools: surveillance, vital statistics
Data are often collected on an ongoing basis
Conducted mainly by federal, state, and local health agencies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The study of determinants of disease or reasons for relatively high or low frequency in specific groups.
Tools: focused investigations
Data collected to test a hypothesis
Conducted by health agencies and academic researchers |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of new cases of a disease
# at risk of developing the disease
during a specified time period |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# of cases present
# in the population
at a specified time
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a group of people with a common characteristic; can be dynamic or fixed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Members may join or leave through birth, death, immigration, emigration, initiation or excommunication |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A population that cannot accept new members and for whihc members cannot become non-members
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Defined population in which all members are biologically capable of developing the disease (susceptible to disease with a non-zero risk of developing the disease, not a high-risk of developing the disease).
Whether a person is at risk for the disease may change over time, with short vs. long-term differences in risk status |
|
|
Term
Reasons for a person not being at risk for a disease |
|
Definition
Already has the disease
Not biologically capable of getting the disease (a woman is not at risk for getting prostate cancer)
has acquired immunity |
|
|
Term
Population at Risk for a Recurrent Disease and Non-recurrent Disease (flowcharts) |
|
Definition
susceptible / at risk --> diseased --> susceptible / at-risk
vs.
susceptible / at-risk --> diseased
or
susceptible / at-risk --> diseased --> immune |
|
|
Term
Natural History of Disease |
|
Definition
Course of a disease from onset to resolution (Last, 1995)
Course of progression if no medical intervention is taken and disease is allowed to run its full course (Timmreck, 1998). |
|
|
Term
Models of Disease Causation |
|
Definition
Proposed models to organize our thinking about multiple causes of disease:
The Epidemiological Triangle
The Wheel Model
Web of Causation
Chinese Boxes |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Implies that the agent, host and environment must each be analyzed to understand patterns of disease
Environment, agent, and host at the corners of triangle
Time is in the center
Example: Legionnaire's Disease
Environment: aqueous reservoir
Agent: legionellae bacilli
Host: susceptible host (age, smoking, diabetes, lung disease)
Time! |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Implies multiple etiologic factors
Recognition of genetic susceptibility
The genetic core is surrounded by the social environment, biologic environment, and physical environment.
Example: HIV Infection
Genetic core: genetic variants in CCR5 and other genes
Social Environment: Culture of IV Drug Use
Biologic Environment: HIV Strain
Physical Environment: Contaminated Needles |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Effects develop as a result of chains of causation.
Each link is the result of a complex geneaology of antecedents.
Example: Breast Cancer |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Set of boxes graduated in size so that each fits into the next larger one. Integrates factors at many levels of organization: micro-level, individual-level, and macro-level causes.
Example: Obesity
Micro-level causes: genetic differences in leptin, leptin receptors, satiety, tolerance for high intensity exercise.
Individual-level causes: eating and energy expenditure choices.
Macro-level causes: obesogenic environment with plentiful inexpensive, fat and caloric dense foods and physical exertion engineered out of our daily lives. |
|
|
Term
Outbreak Investigation: Key Steps |
|
Definition
1. Define the outbreak and validate its existence
2. examine the distribution of cases by time and place
3. look for combinations/interactions of relevant variables
4. develop hypotheses
5. test hypotheses
6. recommend control measures
7. compile findings
8. disseminate findings for future learning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the habitual or usual presence of a disease within a given geographic area |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
occurrence of disease clearly in excess of normal expectancy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
worldwide pandemic (eg influenza of 1918) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
are there more cases of a known disease than would normally be expected?
pandemic
epidemic
pandemic |
|
|
Term
Step 1. Define Outbreak and Validate Existence |
|
Definition
A. establish case definition: the specific operational definition of who "counts" as having the disease B. define the population at risk C. Do observed cases exceed the expected number? D. Calculate the attack rate: # cases among PAR / PAR |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
time and space criteria pathogen-specific: culture results, PCR, serology syndrome-specific: clinical criteria, exclusion criteria strict case definition preferred to increase specificity and minimize false positives |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
# cases among population at risk / population at risk |
|
|
Term
Step 2: Examine distribution of cases over time & place |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
3. Look for combinations of relevant studies |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Microbiology, descriptive epidemiology, previous experience provide clues to possible source and root exposure. For example, which mode of transmission was likely given disease characteristics? -Open-ended interviews with a subset of cases can help identify all relevant exposures. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Droplet contact: coughing, sneezing on another person Direct physical contact: touching an infected person, including sexual contact Indirect contact: usually by touching a contaminated surface Airborne transmission: if the microorganism can remain in the air for long periods Fecal-oral transmission: usually from contaminated food or water sources Vector-borne transmission: carried by insects or other animals. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
conduct a study designed to test a hypothesis. The study design is based on study questions, resources, and target populations. The intent is to determine whether given exposure led the occurrence of the disease. Two typical study designs include retrospective cohort and a case-control |
|
|
Term
Two typical study designs for an outbreak investigation |
|
Definition
Retrospective cohort: individuals selected based on exposure Case-control: individuals selected based on disease status |
|
|
Term
Retrospective cohort study |
|
Definition
individuals are selected for participation based on exposure |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Individuals are selected for participation based on disease status |
|
|
Term
Relative Risk in a Cohort Study |
|
Definition
what is the ratio of the risk of disease in exposed individuals to the risk of disease in non-exposed individuals?
Risk of Incidence in the exposed / risk of incidence in the unexposed
This can be calculated for a COHORT STUDY |
|
|
Term
Interpreting Relative Risk (RR) |
|
Definition
RR = 1 ... the risk in the exposed population is equal to the risk in the non-exposed population; there is no association.
RR>1 ... The risk in the exposed population is greater than the risk in the non-exposed population; a positive association which is possibly causal
RR<1... the risk in the exposed population is less than the risk in the non-exposed population; a negative association and a possibly protective relationship. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
risk in exposed = risk in nonexposed no association |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
risk in exposed > risk in non-exposed
positive association
possibly causal |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
risk in exposed < risk in non-exposed
negative association
possibly protective |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
probability that an event will happen / probability that an event will not happen |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
= P / ( 1 - P ) where P = probability
Example: probability that the Phillies win tonight is 0.33; the odds that the Phillies win tonight is 0.33 / ( 1 - 0.33 ) = 0.33 / 0.67 = 0.5 = 2 to 1 against |
|
|
Term
Calculating Odds Ratio in a Cohort Study |
|
Definition
Odds ratio = odds that an exposed person gets sick / odds that an unexposed person gets sick
= (exposed sick / exposed not sick) / (unexposed sick / unexposed not sick) = exposed sick x unexposed not sick / exposed not sick x unexposed sick = odds ratio |
|
|
Term
Interpreting odds ratios in cohort studies |
|
Definition
OR = 1...risk in exposed = risk in nonexposed (no association)
OR>1... risk in exposed > risk in nonexposed (positive association, possibly causal)
OR<1...risk in exposed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
risk in exposed is equal to risk in nonexposed
no association |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
risk in exposed is greater than the risk in the nonexposed
positive association
possibly causal |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
risk in exposed < risk in non-exposed
negative association
possibly protective |
|
|
Term
Calculating an odds ratio in a case-control study |
|
Definition
odds ratio = odds that a case was exposed / odds that a control was exposed = exposed cases/unexposed cases / exposed controls/unexposed controls |
|
|
Term
Odds ratios in cohort vs. case-control studies |
|
Definition
Cohort studies: odds ratio is the odds that an exposed person gets sick / odds that an unexposed person gets sick. For a cohort study you CAN calculate incidence and RR.
Case-control study: odds that a case was exposed / odds that a control was exposed |
|
|
Term
Step 6: Recommend control measures Step 7: Compile Findings Step 8: Disseminate findings for future learning. |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Proportion of true cases correctly identified as cases or positives
High sensitivity = few false negatives
sensitivity = true positives / (true positives + false negatives)
= number of cases that are correctly identified as having the disease / sum of true positives and the number of cases that are identified as not having the disease. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
proportion of true non-cases correctly identified as negatives
high specificity = few false positives
specificity = true negatives / true negatives + false positives |
|
|
Term
case definition in a food borne illness outbreak |
|
Definition
With outbreaks of food-borne illness, two critical parts of an epidemiologic investigation are the specific case definition and the specifically defined sources of exposure. |
|
|
Term
importance of specific case definition and defined exposure sources |
|
Definition
because an outbreak implies a common source, a specific case definition can increase the efficiency of the investigation by excluding unrelated cases that would dilute estimates of association. Specific exposure information including details on source is a critical part of epidemiologic analysis that needs to be collected up front. |
|
|
Term
food safety = surveillance + epidemiology + speed |
|
Definition
good surveillance improves sensitivity of outbreak detection
rigorous epidemiology improves specificity of outbreak investigation (case definitions and exposure source)
speed improves outbreak containment, reduces harm, and maintains public confidence |
|
|
Term
outbreaks must be conducted rapidly to help identify contaminated products and remove them from the marketplace |
|
Definition
standard practice: -confirm diagnosis -establish existence of outbreak -hypothesis generating interviews -case-control study to test hypothesis -trace source of implicated food product
speed it up -accelerate investigations by combining features of hypothesis generating interviews, case control studies, and source traceback -provide rapid response interview teams to support local investigations -increase efficiency by moving information, not people |
|
|
Term
Comparison of when to use a case control or a cohort study |
|
Definition
A case control study is best when the population at risk is not known, when the disease is rare, when exposure is common, and when time from exposure to disease development is long. Cases and controls can be identified from the population, and exposure can be determined for each group. The direction of inquiry is backwards in time.
A Cohort Study is best when the disease occurs in a well-defined group, the disease is common among the exposed, and the time from exposure to disease is short. A sample without the health population is obtained from the general population, then exposures are compared to emergence of the health problem. The cohort study can be prospective or retrospective. |
|
|