Term
|
Definition
- monitoring process
- limited capacity (can't get better)
- Flexibility to shift attention
- voluntary control =strategic; actively manipulated |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
quick, conclusion before thinking |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
quick and effortless, see three of four items |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
happens once attention is focused
- effort (counting)
- Reaction time (RT) longer |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
not hard and fast distinctions; more of a continuum, or mix of both |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
goal-driven
top-down processing
person directs attention |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Stimmulus-driven
Bottom-up processing
stimulus directs attention |
|
|
Term
Goal-Driven (visual attention) |
|
Definition
Willful direction of one's attention |
|
|
Term
Spaced-Based (Visual Attention) |
|
Definition
Particular spatial location; peripheral information ignored |
|
|
Term
Spotlight analogy (visual attention) |
|
Definition
we zero in on particular regions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
•Laberge (1983): Spotlight analogy
1.Two types of trials
2.Target detection in visual display
3.Focus on middle position
4.Dependent variable: press key when7 presented
5.RT faster when in middle |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
•Visual attention not always spatial
•Refutes spotlight analogy
•Elgy, Driver, Rafal (1994): tested space-based and object based attention
•Independent variable: location of target
•Can use both space-based and object based (flexibility) |
|
|
Term
Stimulus Driven Attention |
|
Definition
•Characteristics of stimuli
Attentional capture
•Visual search: computerized visual display; determine if target present or absent
•Independent variable: number of distractors
Treisman & Gelade (1980)
•Hypothesis: easier to search for single feature vs. conjunction of features
•Searching for conjunctions took longer
|
|
|
Term
Feature Integration Theory |
|
Definition
Treisman, Sykes, & Gelade, 1977
1.Visual search is a two-way process
2.Stage 1:(Pre-attentive processing) basic perceptual features (size, color); “pop out” effect
3.Stage 2: (Post-attention processing) If item not classified, attention must be focused on each item (conjunction search); RT longer
- Stages presented as distinct and noninteractive
- Disagreement with this perspective
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Easier to find targets that have a feature that distractors do not. |
|
|
Term
Limits in Visual Attention |
|
Definition
- low target prevalence
- Study: airbaggage screening
- independent variable: target prevalence
- High prevalence trials: 200 trials (present 50%; 10% of trials)
- low prealene trials: 2000 trials (20%) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
•Wolfe et. al.: target missed increased dramatically from highest to lowest condition; 1/3 of all targets being missed in lowest prevalence condition
•Target absent RT faster than target present responses
- low-prevelance responders probably get used to target not being there, respond faster, and think less
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Retested by Fleck & Mitroff (2007)
- respondent able to change response if identified target after hitting key
- error rates became low
(displays an important factor)
|
|
|
Term
Menneer, Cave, Donnelly (2009) |
|
Definition
Target Search
- Baggage screening
- More items to search for > poorer performance
(suggested that have multiple screeners with specializations)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Period of time after the detection of a visual stimulus during which another stimulus can't be seen
- RSVP: rapid serial visual presentation
1. Series of visual stimuli presented rapidly
2. Shorter time period-blink
3. Longer time periods-ability to attend |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
•Failure to notice obvious changes in visual environment
Simons & Chabris (1999)
1.Group 1: counted # of passes
2.Group 1: bounce and aerial passes
3. Less likely to notice gorilla in difficult condition
|
|
|
Term
Flicker Paradigm (change blindness) |
|
Definition
one feature changes between two rapidly altering versions |
|
|
Term
Coherence (1 of 2 change blindness concepts) |
|
Definition
visual attention necessary to hold elements of scene together |
|
|
Term
Attentional set (2 of 2 concepts of Change Blindness) |
|
Definition
one's strategy or mind-set when watching a visual scene (where are you tuned in?) |
|
|
Term
Cultural Differences of Visual Attention |
|
Definition
Eastern (Japan; China):de-emphasize central objects in a scene; focus on background
Western (U.S.; Europe): focus on central object in scene; de-emphasize background |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
•Misdirection of attention
•Bottom-up processing:
Stimuli that grab your attention
•Top-down processing
Invitation to focus on activity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a nearly constant need to monitor the events occurring in our internal (i.e. thoughts and feelings) and external enviornments
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The examination, consideration, manipulation, and appropriate responding to these events
- attention is one component of working memory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1 Choice in Voluntary Control of attention
Engage in this type of attention means monitoring and responding to one event at the exclusion of others |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1 choice of Voluntary Control of Attention
Engaging in this type of attention means monitoring and responding to multiple events |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
headphones that presented a different message to each ear |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
repeat one of the messages word for word - forces the listener to selectively attent to one message of the dichotic listening
|
|
|
Term
results of speech shadowing |
|
Definition
Participants can shadow the attended message, but know little about the unattended message
- they do notice physical properties: Change in pitch, & gender of the speaker |
|
|
Term
Early-Selection Theory or Broadbent's Filter Model |
|
Definition
- multiple streams of information make it into sensory memory and encode physical characteristics
- the information is then filtered and one source is selected for further processing |
|
|
Term
Cocktail-Party Phenomenon |
|
Definition
Problem of the Early- Selection Theory
- ability to listen to one conversation in the midst of many conversatiosn: if someone says your name, you notics
- early selection theory assums that other conversation is just like white noise, so you wouldn't notice your name |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- another problem of the Early-Selection Theory
- dichotic listening with a twist, change the unattended message in the middle to follow the attended
- participants followed the flow of the conversation, despite being on the "unattended channel" |
|
|
Term
"Shockatropolis"
Corteen and Wood (1972) |
|
Definition
•Phase 1: Listen to list of words including three city names that are followed by shock
•Phase 2: Shadowing task with 6 words (some = cities) from Phase 1 (including shocked words)
•Cities from list = 3X more GSR than other nouns from original list in unattended ear
•New city names = 2X more GSR than other new nouns
▫Must be processing the unattended list beyond physical properties |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Unattended information nis not completely blocked from further analysis, rater, it is attenuated, or "turned down" |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
attention is limited and must be allocated according to the particular demand of the situation
- some tasks require more of the attentional "budget" than others |
|
|
Term
Multimode Theory of Attention |
|
Definition
Attention is flexible and people can switch from early modes of attention (physical properties) to late modes (meaning)
- the listening task makes reaction time to the light slower
-shadowing in the difficult condition was more "costly" than the easy condition
- supports the theory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Test: press a button in response to a light signal while shadowing in dichotic listening
- easy condition: message read= similar meaning, but different gender voice (Physically different; tone, etc.)
- difficult condition: message read = different meaning (semantically different), but same gender voice |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
New research suggests that more exposure to multiple stimuli (i.e., heavy media multitaskers) results in a deficit some cognitive abilities:
•More susceptible to interference from irrelevant environmental stimuli and memories
•Performed worse on a test of task-switching ability
•Do you think all of the extra media use is training us to be unable to pay attention? |
|
|
Term
Modal Model (Informaion-Processing model) |
|
Definition
- a series of chronologically arranged stages through which information passes |
|
|
Term
Sensory Store (Information-Processing Model) |
|
Definition
briefly held representation of a just presented stimulus (e.g., visual, auditory) |
|
|
Term
Long-Term Memory (information-prcessing model) |
|
Definition
vast repository for all experiences, knowledge, and skills accumulated throughout life |
|
|
Term
Short-term Memory (Information-Processing Model) |
|
Definition
the set of processes we use to hold and rehearse information that occupies our current awareness |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the elaborate processing of information that currently resides in consciousness
- the idea that STM is just a temporary holding site for information has been reconcieved |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- information is active in STM only temporarily
- in order to maintain information in STM, it needs to be rehearsed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Like a tape recorder, STM is limited to how much information can be stored by the amount of tape availible |
|
|
Term
George Miller's (1956) Magical Number |
|
Definition
7 ± 2
- the number of itens that can be held in STM (memory span)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
capasity often is assessed through this, the longest string of info (e.g., number letters) that a person can immediatly recall
aka digit span in WAIS (IQ test) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
STM can only keep a limited numer of information items "in the air" at any given time |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
translating incoming information into a more manageable form
–Example: difficult to remember phone number 779-246-5649 until you chunk it into spelling the word “psychology”
- Chunking is like taking the seven balls being juggled and making them bigger
|
|
|
Term
Characteristic of Presentation |
|
Definition
Limited Variable of Chunking
- if rate of presentation is too fast it's hard to remember |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Limited Variable of Chunking
- previous knowledge aids your reorginization of incoming information |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Limited Variable of Chunking
- Longer words take more time to encode, therefore you end up remembering few words
- harder to remembor huppopotamus than cat |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- 1985, Viral (Herpes Simplex) Encephalitis (brain inflammation)
- severe anterograde amnesia
- "just woke up"
- musical abilities perserved |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Auditory coding (aka inner voice) |
|
|
Term
Phonological Similarity Effect |
|
Definition
Lists of similar sounding items are more difficult to keep track of that lists of different sounding items |
|
|
Term
Brandimonte & Gerbino (1993) |
|
Definition
Reversible Figures ~ pictures with two possible interpretations that alternate as you are viewing (e.g., duck or rabbit?)
•If your inner voice says “duck” the image in STM will be a duck
–If the image is quickly labeled as a duck, seeing the rabbit is less likely
•If auditory processing is blocked, both options should remain viable |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A component for Visuo-Spacial Processing
bring image from STM to LTM (block letter cover the “X” task)
Subjects learned uppercase block letters (encoding & drawing), then shown lowercase letter. “X” placed on screen and subject asked if Uppercase in place of Lowercase would cover the “X” (reaction time)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a component for Visuo-Spacial Processing
holding the image in STM once it has been formed (pattern cover “X”)
Similar task as 1, but with a pattern, not a letter. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A Component of Visuo-Spacial Processing
searching the image being held in STM for some feature (arrow = square filled?)
Memorized pattern of small squares. Arrow appeared where squares were, and asked whether square that was there was filled or not.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A component of Visuo-Spatial Processing
actively manipulating an image being held in STM (3D rotation)
Presented with two figures side by side. Had to determine if they were identical figures (image rotation)
|
|
|
Term
Loring-Maier and Halpern (1999) |
|
Definition
•Men tend to be faster than women in all four components of visual/spatial processing
•Speed did NOT come at the expense of accuracy (no differences between men and women) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Attributes forgetting in STM to loss of information from STM due to the passage of time |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Attributes Forgetting in STM to loss of information from STM because information currently being processed is negaticely influenced by the presentation of other information |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
New learning affects remembering of Old Information |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Old information can interfere with learning new information. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
suggested that long-lasting memory becomes consolidated over time
There is clear evidence of both retroactive inhibition that learning on later items can hurt retrieval of ones mastered earlier and the related phenomenon of proactive inhibition that items mastered early on can inhibit learning on later ones. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
attributes forgetting in STM to interference when a new item enters STM, it "bumps out" a perviously stored item |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Forgetting in STM can be attributed to this with interference
When a new item enters STM, it overwrites the previously stored item. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Working Memory is actually interacting subsystems combining to subserve a host of higher-level mental processes (Baddeley, 1986)
- a component of this (auditory STM)
- subvocal rehearsal, phonological storage
•Articulation requires the coordination of various motor movements to produce the basic units of communication (i.e., sounds or signs)
•Audition is prominent because Work. Mem. relies on the articulatory process
•It’s hard to keep track of similar motor movements for words, not necessarily the similar sounds of the words
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Working Memory is actually interacting subsystems combining to subserve a host of higher-level mental processes (Baddeley, 1986)
- a component of this (visual STM)
- imagery, spacial reasoning
Operates independent of Articulatory Loop
•If the task is verbal and response is verbal = interference
•If task is verbal and response is visual = no interference |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Working Memory is actually interacting subsystems combining to subserve a host of higher-level mental processes (Baddeley, 1986)
- a component of this "boss" of STM
- comprehension, reasoning, problem solving
-The “gatekeeper” or “capacity allocator” for attention
-Deploys the appropriate attention to the articulatory loop or the visuo-spatial subsystem
-Responsible for higher-level thoughts–Reasoning and Language Comprehension
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
doing daily activities that require little or no attention
- automaticity develops as the result of extensive practice
|
|
|
Term
Features of Austomatic Processing |
|
Definition
1.Occur without intention; obligatory
2.Not open to conscious awareness; no reflection during action; \ difficult to recall
3.Consume little mental resources; easy to combine with another task |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The ability to name the ink color of a word is inhibited if that word is printed in a conflicting color
- Reading is obligatory, you can't inhibit it
- namin the ink color suffers from interferene because you are reading
- the same is true of words associated with colors: Example, Grass is tough because it is closely associated with green |
|
|
Term
Schneider and Shiffrin (1977) |
|
Definition
•Consistent Mapping was faster than Varied Mapping, especially with practice
•Increasing items in initial memory set = harder for Varied Mapping
Interpretation:
•Consistent Mapping became automatic, that is it occurred in Parallel(all items coded simultaneously), so set size didn’t matter
•Varied Mapping involved Serial processing (one item at a time), so set size makes a big difference
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
scan a display for certain critical items
1.Remember a set of letters
2.Search a frame for those letters and respond positive to any target
–Contained targets(from the set) and distracters(not from the list)
Consistent Mapping (easy): targets = letters, distracters = numbers
Varied Mapping (difficult): targets or distracters = letters |
|
|
Term
Instance-Based View of Automaticity |
|
Definition
•Logan’s interpretation is that early in a task performance is conscious and deliberate
•With practice your memory creates INSTANCES of performing the task
•Performance switches from deliberate computing to instance retrieval |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
"absentmindedness"
doing something automatically that you don't necessarily want to do
- automatic processes can be hard to stop (costs of automaticity) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
an organized body of knowledge (or set of movements) that guides motor activities
- automatic processes can be hard to stop (costs of automaticity) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A well-practiced, but unintended, action takes over when it shares initial sequence elements with a more unfamiliar action
- a action slip
Example: Ice Hockey player tries to stop the same way on roller skates because he is used to the hockey stop. (Doesn’t work so good with roller blades, worse on roller skates. Ouch!) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
External events cause the (inappropriate) activation of a schema and force some type of unwanted behavior.
- an action slip
Example: Driving by Taco Bell and ask for directions to Taco Bell, instead of the Salt Lick (where you really need directions to) |
|
|
Term
Associative Activation Error
|
|
Definition
The intention to do or say something activates a strongly related but inappropriate schema.
- an action slip
Example: Responding to “What’s up?” with “Great!” |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Error lies in forgetting an intention to do something or remembering the intention but forgetting what to do.
Example: Going into the garage and forgetting what you went in there for (e.g., a hammer). |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The desired action is carried out but with the wrong object.
an action slip
Example: Putting things away in the kitchen and you put the cereal in the fridge and the milk in the cupboard (or your car keys in the freezer). |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
CS presented briefly before US
- strongest and most rapid type of conditioning |
|
|
Term
Simultanious Conditioning |
|
Definition
Cs and US presented at same time
- much weaker conditioning
- may be product of distraction of US
- If CS not before US, how can it serve as a signal? |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
CS and US seperated by longer time interval in which neither stimulus is presented
- "memory trace"
- as interval between CS-US interval increases, so does the decline in level of conditioning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Onset of CS precedes US by at least several seconds, CS continues until US is presented
o CS interval impacts conditioning like trace, but not as severe
o As the CS onset and delay become associated, it is easy to think of them as one compound stimulus, therefore the onset begins to evoke the response initially, instead of toward the end of the delay.
o Example: Pavlov’s dogs: 10 second tone (CS), food delayed till end of CS. 1st dog salivated as soon as tone was presented, but over time, dogs began to estimate delay and salivated after 8-9 seconds.
o Compound Stimulus: onset of tone + delay became one |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- CS is presented after US
o Level of conditioning markedly lower than Delay – proving order’s important!
o |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The onset of CS signals a time in which the US will be absent |
|
|
Term
Pavlov’s Substitution Theory |
|
Definition
- By repeatedly pairing the CS with US, the CS becomes a substitute for the US
Problems:
1. CR often doesn’t = UR (often differ in sixe and temporal pattern)
2. US may elicit many responses; CS does not
Not all components of UR present in CR
Food (US) à Salivation (UR) à Chewing (UR) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Action’s that function as tools to work some change in the environment; also called operant responses
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
“Responses that produce a satisfying effect in a particular situation become more likely to occur again in that situation, and responses that produce a discomforting effect become less likely to occur again in that situation”
- Things you do that results in something good are more likely to occur
- Things you do that result in something Bad happening are less likely to occur |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- a series of responses can be chained together to satisfy some goal which will result in annoyance if blocked
- one of three primary laws in Thorndikes Theory
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
connections become strengthened with practice and weakened when practice is discontinued
- one of three primary laws in Thorndikes Theory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the arrival of this stimulus following a response which makes the response more likely to occur; (introduce something good when a particular response occurs) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the removal ofthis stimulus following a response which makes the response more likely to occur; (remove something bad when a particular response occurs) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
opposite of reinforcement; the consequence of a response decreases the likelihood that the response will occur |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
(adding or producing a stimulus)
- introduce something bad when a particular response occurs – Examples: Introduce shock, scold, or yell
o Learns how to act like caregiver who is administering punishment (observational learning)
o Learn through classical conditioning to fear caregiver
o Doesn’t provide any way to learn alternatives to bad behavior |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- (removing or preventing a stimulus): remove something good when a particular response occurs – Examples: Remove Food, Take back Money/Allowance, Take away Privileges
o Reduces un-desirable responses without negative consequences of positive punishment |
|
|
Term
Differential Reinforcement of High Rates (DRH) |
|
Definition
Require behavior a minimum number of times in a given time period before a response is reinforced – or a high rate of behavior requires over a specified time period before response is reinforced |
|
|
Term
Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates (DRL) |
|
Definition
Response reinforced if, and only if, a certain amount of time has passed since last response
- Produced very low rates of responding
- DRL 5 second: Pigeon receives reinforcement if it responses after 5 seconds, but any response before 5 seconds resets the clock
- Often produces “ritual behavior” – Rat going to every corner of the cage before each response |
|
|
Term
Continuous Reinforcement (CRF) |
|
Definition
A fixed 1 to 1 ratio
- A prize every time
- Leads to rapid increases in the rate of behavior
- Not very common in natural environment
- Reinforcement increases behavior |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Behavior that is reinforced on some occasions but not others |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
depends on # of responses |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Depends on amount of time passed (and a minimum # of responses) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Effectiveness of a consequence will be reduced if stimulation has been satisfied; increased if deprived. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Consequence of response must be felt immediately |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
If a consequence does not consistently follow the response, its effectiveness is reduced |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Consequence must be large enough to be worth the effort |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Undesired behavior unrelated to the desired behavior
- Accidentally reinforced
- Becomes fixed in the subject’s mind as necessary for reinforcement |
|
|
Term
Extinction of Classical Conditioning |
|
Definition
- repeated presentations of the CS by itself |
|
|
Term
Extinction of Instrumental Conditioning |
|
Definition
no longer presenting the reinforcer as a consequence of the instrumental response |
|
|
Term
Extinction of Continuous Reinforcement |
|
Definition
Burst of responses; then gradually decreases |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
decrease responding due to the passage of time and occurs with prolonged absence of experience with the CS or instrumental responses |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
decrease responding due to omitting the US or Reinforcer |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The emotional reaction induced by withdrawal of an expected reinforcer – can lead to aggression |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
when time passes between extinction and testing, responding often spontaneously recovers |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
allow subject to repeat the instrumental response over and over without constraint |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
defined in terms of the effect that it had on the environment; activities that have the same environmental effect, are considered instances of the same operant response
- What is important is not the muscles and nerves orchestrating the response but the way that the behavior operates on the environment |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
process in which successively closer approximations to the desired response are reinforced until the response finally occurs
- Sound of food deliver device (Food magazine) is paired with delivery of food to the cup: Elicits a sign tracking response- Go to food cup |
|
|