Term
|
Definition
- Language as constitutive (Internal)
- Language as Communicative (External)
|
|
|
Term
Language as Constitutive (Internal) |
|
Definition
Creates everyhting in our universe; language as a creator - Subjective/identity: we become via language
- Social relationships: Determines how and with whom we create relationships with
- System of knowledge and belief: Constructs a system of understanding (Christian)
|
|
|
Term
Language as Communicative (External) |
|
Definition
Method of expression, literary style, vocabulary and way of using it - Reflectionist theory: Reflection of reality, defining social, economic, ethnic (etc) boundaries Tu/Vous
- Instrumental Theory: tool used to affect social ends, to produce social status Resonse of tu to Vous
|
|
|
Term
Non Verbal Communication (metamessage)
*every verbal communication has a metamessage* |
|
Definition
- Body Modification: Clothing, ornamentation, somatic body modification (tattoos, piercing, etc)
- Use of microspace:
- Proxemics: how we conciously manipulatte space (fixed, semi-fixed or dynamic spatial features)
- Kinesics: How we use gestures
|
|
|
Term
Design Features of Language (Charles Hockett) |
|
Definition
ODADSP - Openess: creativity, making endless message
- Displacement: Talking about something not present
- Arbitrariness: no set relation between words+meaning
- Duality of patterning:
1)Phoneme: smallest unit of sound 2) Morpheme: smallest unit of meaning - Semanticity: Meaning
- Prevarication: ability to use grammatically correct sentences with false or no meaning (lying)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The Study of classification systems in given domains that organise people`s knowledge of their universe. Implies that all cultures are systematic and classify and categorise the world as they see it. - Tells us what exists and what is relevant
- How or what is important and defined, what are relevant features
- Tells us about relevant contrasts in relation to other things
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Form of language and thought that asserts meaningful link between two expressions from different semantic domains; linking two dissimilar things. made up of: Predicate: part that suggests familiar domain (clarifies subject) Entailments: the attributes of the predicate which clarify the subject (relate it to the culturally defined domain) Subject: Suggest the unfamiliar object to be clarified |
|
|
Term
Things to remember about metaphors |
|
Definition
- They create ambiguity and need to be understood in cultural context
- Usually, one of the linkages is more familiar than the other
- They have the power to create
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
KOST - Kinship: extends kin titles to others ie, `godfather`
- Organic: Extends animate qualities to innanimate objects `chair leg, heart of city, ipod skin`
- Societal: Uses social orders to show how the universe works (projects a symbol onto the universe) `hierarchy of religion onto society and visa versa`
- Technological: Uses tech to compare `I am a bit rusty`
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Process of linking parts of semantic domains into wholes ie `she likes to read Poe, crown decision` |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Language and thought are intrinsically connected STRONG HYPOTHESIS: Language determines culture WEAK HYPOTHESIS: language influences culture |
|
|
Term
Linguistic competence (Noam Chomsky) |
|
Definition
The often tacit knowledge structure necessary for understanding and performing language... speaking. Components of: Phonological Competence: To decipher and use sound Lexical Competence: Recognise and use vocabulary Grammatical Competence: Recognise and use structure Discourse Competence: Organise elements above onto meaningful structures. |
|
|
Term
Linguistic competence (Noam Chomsky) of language acquisition |
|
Definition
- based on inate human developmental process (hard wired) *critical age hypothesis*
- Language acquisition follows a universal sequence
- Language acquisition is linked to abstract thought (we learn to express abstract thought as we grow)
|
|
|
Term
Communicative Competence (Dell Hymes) |
|
Definition
The sometimes tacit knowledge of social and cultural rules for the understanding and performance of language, ie speaking in a culturally meaningful way Frames of language, norms of behaviour, and social interaction Bonvillain outlines: - Competent expression of intention
- assrtion of rights
- response to others`rights
- undrstanding and responding correctly to social distinctions
|
|
|
Term
Language Socialization model (Ochs and Sheffelin) |
|
Definition
- Language is a central dimension of socialization
Children are socialized by language Children socialize through language 2. Socialization involves agency of all the participants 3. Socialixation happens thoughout life and in all contexts *essentially links linguistic and communicative competence* Examples from Bonvillain: food preference ``eat your veggies if you want dessert`` dinner talk=lesson in hierarchy of age and gender |
|
|
Term
Ethnography of Communication (Hymes) |
|
Definition
- Speech community: people who share the same rules and frames for interpreting metamessages
- Speech situation: instance of talking or non talking ie, dinner, meeting, crackhouse
- Speech event: beginning and ending norms ie dinner conversation, religious service
- Communicative-speech acts: Smaller usage if words, the individual accomplishments of utterances (pass the salt)
- communicative style: Characteristic way of speaking (loud, hand talker, etc)
- ways of speaking: Speech in particular context (Church vs. Dinner table)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
SPEAKING: Situation: Time + place Participants: Who, what is the relationship (speaker, listener, audience) End: Reason+Goals Act Sequence: Sequence of events, who begins, ends continues Key: Mood or tone Instrument: Channel of speech Norms: Rules about speech, whispering, pauses, etc. Genre: different types (prayer, small talk) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Temporality: Chronological order
- Meaningful: to the speaker
- Reportability: to the listener
- Significance: point
- Credibility: Must be believable
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Occurs across all cultures, we reflect on our actions in retrospect ``framing``the event
- Events are told with a temporal orderliness, having a causal relationship
- The events tend to be unexpected and problematic, giving significance to them
- Narrating personal experience consists of two practices: A) plot is consistent and coherent B) raises ambiguity (no answer)
- We tell stories to explain who we are, to figure out a relationship to the narrative
|
|
|
Term
Language and Socialization Model |
|
Definition
Focus on documenting how people manage concerted activity by constantly informing and conforming each other to whatever it is that has to happen. Examining the ``so what``, things we take for granted |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Patterned, yet improvised - Openings: technical (social acomplishment), shows how relations are established
i) Adjacent pairs: Sets of linked talk, "how are you?" requireds a response ii) Ratification of topic: What is the purpose of the conversation? It must be ratified to continue 2. Cohesion: i) Back Channel talk: ongoing ratification, co-productions of the speakers right to speak ii) Turn taking: Tag questions, pauses, silence, invites the listener to speak iii) Repair mechanisms: Get's the conversation back on topic (higher status usually gets to do this) iv) Repetition: Signals that the listener is listening and ratifies the topic, establishes co-participation in a conversation v) Punning: It is often unconscious, serves to ratify and also ensure that the listener is listening (creates co-membership) 3. Closings: Closings also have a beginning, middle and an end |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Statements which imply needs from the other person - Sincere and reasonable
- Stated in different ways depending on the context and the interlocutors
- Lower status people will tend to use directives in less direct ways (hinting)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- About dealing with FTA's (Face Threatening Acts)
- Respect and Freedom to do what you want are the goals
- Handled differently depending on context and the status of the interlocutors, Lower status tend to use politness more often
Positive Politeness: Approved, co-membership Negative Politeness: Tries to avoid being a bother Bald: no politeness |
|
|