Shared Flashcard Set

Details

INR LAW MIDTERM
SET 1
23
International Studies
Undergraduate 3
10/08/2010

Additional International Studies Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
SS Lotus (France v Turkey)
Definition
Opino Juris Case
Court ruled that it fulfilled only one of the two obligations for opino juris.
NO OPINO JURIS
Spelled out the guidelines for opino juris.
Term
Paquete Habana
Definition
Customary Law Case
The US Court ruled that in the absensnce of treaties on the matter, state practice could help decide the case.
Term
Assylum Case (Colombia v Peru)
Definition
Customary Law
This case dealt with Regional Customary Law and Persistant Objector.
Term
The Right of Passsage Over Indian Territory (Portugal v Turkey)
Definition
Customary Law
This case dealt with local/special customary law.
Term
North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v Denmark and Netherlands)
Definition
Opino Juris
In this case the court ruled that TIME IS NOT A FACTOR in determining the exisistence of cutomary law. They enphasized that the state practice had to be widespread.
Term
Corfu Channel Case (UK v Albania)
Definition
General Principles of Law
The court reached its decision by turning to a general principle of customary law. They said, "It is every states obligation to abstain from knowingly using their territory for illegal purposes."
Term
Filartiga v Pena-Irala
Definition
General Assembly Resolution
The court ruling refered to a general assembly resolution bc they were customary law.
This case also deal with US Alien Tort Claims Act.
Term
Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion)
Definition
General Assembly Resolution
The court releid on a general assembly resolution because it was an extention of the UN charter.
Term
Texaco v Libia
Definition
General Assembly Resolution
The court relied on a general assembly resolution. They explained the requirements for ruling according to a resolution.
A general assembly resolution is binding if: Strong Majority and Fair Mix of voters.
Term
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland
Definition
Unilateral Statements
The court ruled that even though unilateral statements are not put in writting, they are binding.
Term
Nuclear Test Case
Definition
Unilateral Statements
Unilateral Statements are binding even if the govenment changes.
Term
Jesse Lewis Claim
Definition
Interpretation of Treaties
Court said, it not up to states to unilaterally interpret or determine the meaning of treaties.
Term
Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (UK v Iceland)
Definition
Rebus Sic Stantibus
This case elucidates that the ICJ has the sole jurisdiction to determine whether a fundamental change in circumstance occured.
Term
Hungary v Slovakia
Definition
Rebus Sic Stantibus
The court ruled that the Slovakia's porported fundamental changes where not enough to be rebus sic stantibus.
Term
Techt v Hughes
Definition
Rebus Sic Stantibus
The court made a distiction between political and economic treaties.
Term
Tinoco Claims Arbitration (UK v Costa Rica)
Definition
Recognition
Court ruled that, "recognition was not required and that sovereignty must be ackknowleged."
The court established that the unrecognized government was a de facto governemnt.
The de facto governemnt's contracts must be honored.
Term
Salimoff v Standard Oil
Definition
Recognition
Court said, "even if the government is not recognized, but is maintaining internal peace, its acts are authoritative."
An unrecognized government is still a government.
Term
National Petrochemical v M/T Stolt Sheaf
Definition
Regonition
Court ruled that unrecognized governments can have access to courts.
Term
Island of Palmas
Definition
Territory
This case deals with discovery, occupation, contiguity, and prescription of territory.
The court ruled: 1 discovery without occupation results only in an inchoate (incomplete) claim.
2 This case also established that contiguity has no basis in international law.
3 The court ruled that a while prescription is generally illegal, the passage of time legitimates the action.
Term
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v Norway)
Definition
Territory
This case elucidates how important sovereignty is for having title.
In this case the court settled a dispute over title. Sovereignty over the territory was the determining factor.
Term
Botswana v Namibia
Definition
Territory
The court ruled that, states can lose the title to territory to prescription if they don't speak up against it.
Term
Burkina Faso v Mali
Definition
Territory
The ICJ upheld the use of uti possidetis
Term
El Salvador v. Honduras
Definition
Territory
The court used Condominium in this case.
Condominium means it is shared.
This case is also notable because uti possidetis nor the historic bay concept could solve the matter entirely.
Supporting users have an ad free experience!