Term
|
Definition
Results in the Decrease of condtioned response (CR)
(CS+ and CS-) |
|
|
Term
Bidirectionality of Responding |
|
Definition
Compares the baseline of excitatory responses to baseline of inhibitory responses |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Takes CS- from original test and putsit with a CS+ from a different excitatory condition and see if ti still extinguishes the CS+ abiltity to produce CR |
|
|
Term
Retardation of Acquistion Test |
|
Definition
Measure amount of time it takes for a CS- to turn into a CS+
If it happens slowly then there was an inhibitor effect |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Explicitly presenting the CS after the CS and US have been paired.
Loses effect because it has been shown to much |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Due to long interval of time since last exposure to the US |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
No previous conditioning with CS |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Return of an EXTINGUISHED response after a novel stimulus |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Return of a HABITUATED response after a novel stimulus |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Something that draws more interest than other things.
sometimes something previously seen |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The CR has been inhibited by Preexposure |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Have exposure tothe CS before the Conditioning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Having exposure to the US before Condtioning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Happens when the CS or US is presented with no effect or response |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Did research on CS prexposure |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the greater the intensity the stronger the conditioning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
not all CS s can be paired with all US s |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
needs the US to reach the CR |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Can reach the CR without the presense of a US |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Pavlovs idea that CS s can be substitutes for US s but they cannot be. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Devaluation study
Sought to Devalue the link between the CS and the US to see if the CR would be weakened |
|
|
Term
Higher order conditioning |
|
Definition
Training in another CS from a CS |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. Link two CS’s prior to conditioning episodes
ii. (1) CS1 + CS2
iii. (2) CS1 + US ® UR
iv. (3) CS1 ® CR
v. (4) CS2 ® CR
vi. CS2 is never directly paired with the US |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Conditioning a response that is opposite of the response that would typically be elicited |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Proposed that a classical conditioning mechanism controls tolerance to some drugs |
|
|
Term
Conditioned Compensatory Response |
|
Definition
your body compensates for a drug when you know its coming after repeated us of drug over time |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Decrease of effectiveness of a drug after repeated use. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. CS1 + US ® UR
ii. light + shock ® suppression
iii. 2. CS1 + CS2 + US ® UR
iv. light + tone + shock ® suppression
v. 3. CS2 ® no response
vi. tone ® no suppression of responding
vii. original stimulus blocks the the second stimulus from having a effect. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. If one stimulus is greater in intensity it will overshadow the other stimulus.
ii. lT + food powder ® salivation
iii. T ® salivation
iv. l ® no salivation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. Desingned to address the problem of overshadowing and kamin blocking
ii. DVcs = k (l - Vtotal)
iii. D= Change
iv. Vcs = Associative value of a particular CS
v. = maximum amount of conditioning supported by the US
vi. Vtotal = combined associative values of all CS’s present on a particular trial
vii. k = learning rate parameter |
|
|
Term
instrumental Conditioning |
|
Definition
R - S
Respones cause an action
Discrete trials- limited number of trials |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
used puzzle boxes and trial error learning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
boxes that thorndike built tha thad different simple levers that allowed the animal inside to get out and it learned that when it did these things good things happened |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. Responses that are followed with a satisfying state of affairs will become strongly linked with that situation, so when the organisms is in that situation the response will tend to be repeated.
ii. Good responses tend to be repeated bad responses tend no to be repeated. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
incidental behaviorr are repeated because they are followed by a positive reward |
|
|