Term
|
Definition
cooperative activity of developing and advancing arguments and of responding to the arguments of others |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
claim advanced with reasons in its support |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
promoting/opposing an idea in public settings |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
capacity to wield influence to shape important decisions that affect others' lives |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
open discussion of issues that affect everyone |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
society made of groups of people who see the world differently, value different activities, hold different religious beliefs, and have different goals |
|
|
Term
What are the three reasons why we make arguments? |
|
Definition
to persuade, justify, and discover |
|
|
Term
What are two main misconceptions of arguments? |
|
Definition
they are dry and logical, and they can only occur when people disagree |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
deeply held moral commitments acquired from family, culture, religion, and personal experience |
|
|
Term
How does one solve disagreements in pluralistic societies? |
|
Definition
search for unifying values between diverse groups |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
agreement to engage in the cooperative process of argumentation rather than to resolve disagreement by other means |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
rules or guidelines according to which arguments will take place |
|
|
Term
What does it mean to make or advance an argument? |
|
Definition
presenting reasons in support of a conclusion or claim |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
claim advanced with reasons in its support |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
statement that the advocate believes or is in the process of evaluating |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
statement advanced for the purpose of establishing a claim |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
claim that has been reached through reasoning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
conclusion drawn on the basis of reasons |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
series of arguments advanced to support the same general contention or set of conclusions |
|
|
Term
What are the two components of an argument? |
|
Definition
conclusion (claim) AND supporting reasons |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
one's sense of how arguments develop |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
words and phrases like "because" and "therefore" that provide important clues about the reasons and conclusions in an argument |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the relations among the reasons and conclusions in an argument |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
word or phrase that signals something other than a reason or conclusion about the content of an argument |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
statement acknowledging the existence of an argument, evidence, or attitude opposing the conclusion being advanced |
|
|
Term
What are the two types of reasons? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
reason rooted in observation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
reasons consisting of beliefs, values, assumptions, or generalizations that link evidence to a conclusion |
|
|
Term
Which type of reason can be shown to be true or false? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
What type of reason cannot be shown to be true or false? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
What are the three characterizations of conclusions? |
|
Definition
propositions of fact value, or policy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
statement that reports, describes, predicts, or makes a causal claim |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a claim that can be potentially verified as either true or false |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
making claims about the future |
|
|
Term
What are the three criteria that a proposition of fact should satisfy? |
|
Definition
1) Advance sufficient evidence, 2) Clarify and interpret the evidence, 3) Ensure the evidence's relevance to the claim is made clear |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
statement that advances judgment about morality, beauty, merit, or wisdom |
|
|
Term
What are the three criteria a proposition of value should satisfy? |
|
Definition
1) Clarify the criteria or evaluation, 2) Provide evidence supporting the evaluation, and 3) Use evidence to show the criteria of evaluation have been satisfied |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
statement urging that an action be taken or discontinued |
|
|
Term
What are the three criteria for propositions of policy? |
|
Definition
1) Provide evidence that a problem exists as a result of the status quo, 2) Show that the problem is serious and requires immediate attention, 3) Outline a proposal to solve the problem |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
arguments leading to necessary conclusions when their reasons are true |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
reason in a deductive argument |
|
|
Term
What is the structure of a deductive argument? |
|
Definition
moving from a general principle (major premise) to a more specific observation (minor premise) to a conclusion that applies the general principle to a particular case |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
particular conclusion to which the reasons/premises in a deductive argument, when accepted as true, unavoidably lead |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
argument whose reasons lead to a probable conclusion |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
conclusion that can be shown to be more or less likely, but not necessary |
|
|
Term
What is the structure of inductive arguments? |
|
Definition
Lead from specific observations to a general conclusion |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
process in which the conclusion of an argument moves beyond its stated evidence |
|
|
Term
Deductive arguments arrive at what type of conclusions? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Inductive arguments arrive at what type of conclusions? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
identifying and marking the statements in an argument |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
any phrase or sentence that supplies a portion of the argument's inference or meaning |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
making each statement or implied statement in an argument a complete sentence, changing indefinite references like pronouns to definite nouns and placing reasons above the conclusions they support |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
mapping an argument, using only the letters assigned during scanning and drawing lines from reasons to their conclusions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
paris of reasons that must work together to lend support to their conclusion |
|
|
Term
What type of reasoning uses complementary reasons? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
To what type of conclusions do complementary reasons lend themselves? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a repeated phrase or term that links statements to one another (usually in deductive reasoning) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
conclusion that is then used as a reason |
|
|
Term
What did Toulmin say are the three components of an argument? |
|
Definition
Claim (conclusion), data (evidence), and warrant (generalization or connective that links data to a claim) |
|
|
Term
What did Toulmin call "backing"? |
|
Definition
foundational assumptions that support a warrant |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
terms that indicate the intended strength of a conclusion |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
possible answer or exception to the inference being drawn |
|
|
Term
In Toulmin's model, what is the connective? |
|
Definition
warrant (links data to a claim) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
weak interpretation of opponent's argument to make it easier to refute |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
personal qualities that assist us in making ethically good choices |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
variety of moral and ethical perspectives present in contemporary societies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
perspectives relying on the essential values of a political system for their criteria of ethical assessment |
|
|
Term
Human nature perspectives |
|
Definition
perspectives developing around more than one essential qualities of human nature |
|
|