Term
Why was Rome so successful in war? |
|
Definition
- Rome had strong army
- every male citizen had to serve in military when needed
- troops organized into legions of 6,000 men and then divided into small, mobile units of 60 to 120 soldiers
- legionaries were well-trained and disciplined; soldiers who deserted army were killed
- Romans set up permanent military settlements to defend river crossings and mountains
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
well-trained Roman soldiers |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
permanent military settlements |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Carthage wanted to seize Strait of Messina, the narrow passageway between Sicily and Italy
- Romans conquered most of Carthage's colonies in Sicily but Carthage still had advantage because of their fleet/naval superiority
- Romans built a larger fleet to fight back
- Romans had new tactic; used grappling hooks to stop Carthage boats, board them, and fight
- Carthage never regained Sicily or sea
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
payment for damages; Carthage had to give Romans indemnity after First Punic War |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Hannibal became general of Carthage army in Spain
- Hannibal wanted to take his army and the war into Italy itself
- When crossing cold Alps, half of his army and most elephants died
- Hannibal defeated most Roman armies
- Scipio, a Roman general, attacked Carthage and sent Hannibal back to Africa
- Hannibal paid indemnity and handed over lands in Spain
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Carthage posed no threat to Rome, but Rome forced war on Carthage
- Roman senator, Cato, wanted to destroy Carthage
- Romans burned Carthage and sent its existing population into slavery
- This victory gave Rome complete control over the of the Western Mediterranean
|
|
|
Term
Why were people discontent in Roman Empire? |
|
Definition
- corrupt Roman officials stole provincial wealth for personal gain
- wealthy Romans took land from small farmers and turned agriculture into a profitable business
- wealthy Romans used slaves from captured lands as cheap labor
- slave labor repaced paid labor and there were no jobs
- gap between rich and poor grew bigger
- slave/lower-class revolts constantly happened
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
group of three persons with equal power |
|
|
Term
Who were the leaders in the triumvirate? |
|
Definition
1)general Pompey; 2)politician Crassus; 3)Julius Caesar |
|
|
Term
Caesar's Political Maneuvering |
|
Definition
- from aristocratic family
- allied himself with Pompey and Crassus
- year later elected consul
- ruled as part of triumvirate for decade
- used force and bribery to silence government critics and bend senators and tribunes to their will
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- C. realized he needed military victories to advance political career
- Took command in Gaul and brought Celts under Roman rule
- Fought Germanic tribes and invaded Britain
- Rome's lower classes saw him as military leader
- Senators saw C. as a threat and allied with Pompey
- Senators ordered C. to give up his army
- C. did not give up and civil war occured
- C. swiftly captured all of Italy
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- granted Roman citizenship to many people in the provinces outside of Italy
- public works programs to help poor- distributing free grain, hiring free laborers
- new solar, Julian calendar based on 365 days and 1 extra day every fourth year
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- many believed Caesar was a tyrant who meant to make himself king
- Roman law stated that anyone who plotted to become king could be killed without trial
- group of senators led by Brutus and Cassius stabbed Caesar to death
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- 2nd triumvirate in Rome- Octavian, Marc Antony, Marcus Lepidus- they defeated Caesar's assassins
- Lepidus was forced by Octavian to retire from office, Antony committed suicide in order to escape Octavian's capture, and Octavian's period of rule marked the beginning of the Roman Empire
|
|
|