Term
|
Definition
The process by which the presence of others can facilitate behaviour. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
ZAJONC Performance depends on the subjective difficulty of a task. Presence of others strengthens the most dominant response. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Mere exposure Evaluation apprehension Distraction Self-awareness: discrepancies between ideal/actual performance. People feel overloaded so don't attend to important cues |
|
|
Term
Classification Of Group Tasks |
|
Definition
Divisible vs Unitary Maximising vs Optimising
Additive: sum of effort Conjuctive: weakest member Compensatory: average of effort Discretionary: group decision. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Tendency for people's performance to decrease in a group when they are not individually responsible for their actions. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
As group size increases, individual effort decreases |
|
|
Term
Loss of motivation in the presence of others |
|
Definition
If no matching standard Sucker effect: if belief others loaf |
|
|
Term
Difference between facilitation/loafing |
|
Definition
In loafing individual effort is not evaluated. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Tendency to abandon normal constraints on behaviour and lose a sense of individuality and responsibility. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Features of the environment that distract from self. |
|
|
Term
Social Identity model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE) |
|
Definition
Deindividualisation due to increased group awareness (norms) rather than a loss of individual focus. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Group interaction increases initial leanings of group members. Likely to interact with similar others Can be explained by normative and informational influences and conformity. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Way of thinking when group cohesion is prioritised over the right decision or alternatives |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Impartiality Welcoming criticism Dividing into subgroups then bring back together- allows dissent and prevents conformity/illusions of unanimity. |
|
|
Term
Contingency Theory of Interaction |
|
Definition
TASK leaders: better in low/high control groups RELATIONSHIP leaders: better in moderate control groups |
|
|