Term
stated purpose of the American Revolution |
|
Definition
liberty (NOT fraternity, unlike French) |
|
|
Term
what is the balance that the government must maintain? |
|
Definition
Order and Liberty; safety vs. freedom |
|
|
Term
what happened to previous governments? |
|
Definition
either they were too strong and disregarded liberties, or too weak to be a force. |
|
|
Term
what was the motivation for the American "league of friendship" rather than a unified govt.? |
|
Definition
afraid of centralized government support for states' rights |
|
|
Term
what could congress under the Articles do? |
|
Definition
1. make peace with foreign countries 2. run the post office 3. coin money |
|
|
Term
what couldn't Congress under Articles do? |
|
Definition
1. levy taxes 2. regulate commerce 3. make national laws 4. make national currency |
|
|
Term
what were the two MAJOR, central weaknesses of the Articles? |
|
Definition
1. no powerful executive 2. no national judicial system
-- this is because of FEAR -- didn't trust strong leaders |
|
|
Term
who organized the Philadelphia Convention, and to what purpose? |
|
Definition
Ben Franklin; ostensibly to rework the Articles but actually totally changed them |
|
|
Term
what was the Great Compromise / Connecticut Compromise? |
|
Definition
instead of Virginia Plan (representation based on state population) or the New Jersey Plan (representation equal for all states) Congress will have two parts: --Senate, which will have two senators regardless of pop --House of Reps, which will have representatives based on population -- -- to become a law, bill must be passed by BOTH House and Senate |
|
|
Term
how many House Reps are there? Senators? |
|
Definition
House Reps: 435 Senators: 100 |
|
|
Term
what was the 3/5 Compromise? |
|
Definition
North: count slaves for taxation but not representation (south pays more) South: count slaves for representation but not taxation (south represented more) INSTEAD for both representation and taxation a slave is 3/5 of a person |
|
|
Term
what was the moral problem with the 3/5 Compromise? what repercussions did it have? |
|
Definition
how could a country based on equality allow human slavery? --later on, attitude the blacks are subhuman would die hard |
|
|
Term
what were 3 smaller compromises in the forming of the Constitution? |
|
Definition
1. whether Pres is chosen by Congress or People -- popular candidate in states gets all electoral votes 2. pres chosen for life term, 2 years or 3 years? --four year term, as many as wanted; nowadays most is 10 years if took over from previous president supreme court picked by senate or pres? --president nominates and senate confirms |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
powers of govt. divided btwn federal government and states. anything that affects lives of citizens goes to states; affects country at whole, feds get it. |
|
|
Term
define: separation of powers |
|
Definition
divided powers of federal government between Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branch |
|
|
Term
what is the function of each of the three governmental branches? |
|
Definition
executive: to enforce laws and lead the nation legislative: to make the laws judicial: to interpret the laws and determine whether they are constitutionality |
|
|
Term
define: checks and balances |
|
Definition
the ability of each branch of government to stop any other branch from doing anything that isn't part of its role. |
|
|
Term
how does the executive branch check the other two? |
|
Definition
legislative: president can veto a bill passed by Congress (refuse to sign the bill) judicial: president NOMINATES a new justice if there is a vacancy on SCourt |
|
|
Term
how does the legislative branch check the other two? |
|
Definition
executive: can override a presidential veto by 2/3 vote in House and Senate (each) judicial: can refuse to confirm pres' nominee for SCourt and make a new amendment to the Constitution (overrides SCourt's ability to interpret the law) by having 3/4 of state legislatures pass it |
|
|
Term
how does the judicial branch check the other two? |
|
Definition
both: JUDICIAL REVIEW -- can declare ANY law to be unconstitutional |
|
|
Term
define: writ of habeas corpus |
|
Definition
document that forces a jailer to release a person from jail unless the person has been formally CHARGED or CONVICTED of a crime |
|
|
Term
when, historically, was the writ of habeas corpus suspended? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
define: bill of attainder |
|
Definition
finding someone guilty without a trial |
|
|
Term
what are the three things in the Constitution that were NOT need a compromise? |
|
Definition
1. no suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus 2. no bills of attainder 3. no ex-post facto laws |
|
|
Term
how many states had to agree to ratify the Constitution? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
what is the purpose of the SCourt according to the federalists? |
|
Definition
to check the power of the tyrannical majority and make sure minorities aren't abused -- serves as conscience |
|
|
Term
according to the Federalists, how can governments be corrupted? |
|
Definition
by the power itself, but also through influence of factions |
|
|
Term
how can a strong central government protect the balance between liberty and order? |
|
Definition
if government isn't able to protect the country, there won't be any freedom to protect |
|
|
Term
according to Charles Beard, who ratified the constitution? (demographics) |
|
Definition
delegates from states with better-off urban and commercial sectors |
|
|