Term
|
Definition
Arguing that a claim is true or false solely because of its origin Example: you can safely dismiss that alternative energy plan. It's the brainchild of a liberal think tank in Washington |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Arguing that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole Example: the Atams that make up the human body are invisible. Therefore, the human body is invisible |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Arguing that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts Example: this machine is heavy. Therefore all the parts of this machine are heavy |
|
|
Term
The fallacy of appeal to the person or ad Hominem |
|
Definition
Rejecting a claim by criticizing the person who makes it rather than the claim itself. Example: Jones has argued for a ban on gov't sanctioned prayer in schools And at school sponsored events. But he's a rabid atheists without morals of any kind |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The use of a word in two different senses in an argument For example: Only man is rational No woman is a man Therefore, no woman is rational |
|
|
Term
Fallacy of the appeal to popularity |
|
Definition
Arguing that the claim must be true merely because of a substantial number of people believe it. Example: of course the war is justified. Everyone believes that it's justified. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Arguing that a claim must be true just because it's part of a tradition. Example: acupuncture has been used for 1000 years in China. It must work |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Arguing that a lack of evidence proves something. It must be true because it hasn't been proven false. Example: no one has shown that ghosts aren't real, so they must be real |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The use of the motions as premises in an argument. It consists of trying to persuade someone of a conclusion solely by our rousing his or her feelings rather than presenting relevant reasons |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The deliberate raising of an irrelevant issue during an argument |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The distorting weakening or oversimplifying of a person's position so what can be more easily attacked or refuted |
|
|