Term
|
Definition
Determine whether there is a casual relationship between the IV and the DV |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Construct validity- IV reflects hypothetical construct
- Content validity- operationalised to reflect variable of interest
- External validity- can be generalized
- Ecological validity- real-life events.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Reduce chance of Type 2 error- missing the relationship.
IV: minimise error variance.
Want to see a change no overlap between conditions
DV: increase sensitivity - can detect small influences
Minimise measurement error- reliable
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
PROS: relationships of many variables CONS: can't conclude the cause -reliability/validity questioned in self-reports |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Choose variables and conditions carefully- content/construct/external/ecological validity.
- Create strong manipulations- powerful study.
- Consistency between/within conditions.
- Use manipulation checks- to check IV worked.
|
|
|
Term
Restriction Range (of DV) |
|
Definition
Ceiling effect: maximum too low
Floor effect: minimum too high |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Practice effect: skill/boredom after practice- reduce validity.
- Carryover effect: changes in the psychology of pps due to earlier trials, eg. frustration.
- Response set: response strategies- reduce validity.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Prevent order effect.
Systematically changing the order of trials for each pp. in a balanced way. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Sensitive DV
- Don't restrict ranges of responses
- Practice/multiple trials (reliability)
- Counterbalance or randomise order.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
All members of the population have the same chance of being selected. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Population subgroups identified. Random sampling from subgroups |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Everyone from a random area or population stratum is researched |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Mix between stratified and convenience sampling |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Participants recruit other participants |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Biased sampling: not representative of population -Volunteer bias: volunteers might have some specific traits (eg. active) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Observe and describe a behaviour/mental process, the situation it occurs in and the people who exhibit it. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Range from naturalistic to systematic. PROS: -not in artificial situations CONS: -experimenter's expectancies guide data gathering. -Can't make a causal link between variables. -Confounding variables. -No informed consent -Reactivity effect |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Pros:- less artificial -indepth description. CONS: -Confounding variables -subjective interpretation -unsystematic -poor generalizability. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
PROS: -control -objective -cause-effect CONS: -ethical limitations -demand characteristics |
|
|