Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Executive Power and Commerce Clause Cases
Con Law cases
13
Law
Undergraduate 3
03/22/2010

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Ex Parte Milligan
Definition
1866, tried to overthrow state gov't, habeas corpus suspended, war ends, habeas corpus ruled unconstitutional
Term
Champion v Ames
Definition
1903, transported lotto tickets, commerce clause allows specific items to be banned
Term
Shreveport rate case
Definition
1914, texas required railroads to give cheaper rates for same distance in texas. Found that congress has power to regulate transit, too, even through leg org
Term
Stafford v Wallace
Definition
1922, fraud in meat-packing, congress created regulations, found that this was legal because stockyards affected other states
Term
Myers v US
Definition
1926, postmaster was removed, found to be legal because they perform purely executive duty
Term
Humphrey's Executor v US
Definition
1935, FDR fired FTC director for political reasons without consenting congress, it was unconstitutional because he also performed legislative duties
Term
US v Curtis-Wright
Definition
1936, War in paraguay and bolivia, c-w sold some machine guns, ruled that executive had external powers to block such a sale
Term
US v Belcomt
Definition
1937, Russia turns communist, agree to trade assets with US, ruled that this treaty is legal so the asset trade is legal
Term
Korematsu v US
Definition
1944, japanese in certain areas interned, ruled legal to prevent war time assistance
Term
Youngstown Sheet and Tube v Sawyer
Definition
1952, During Korean war president took over steel companies to insure delivery of metal, rule unconstitutional because he didn't use taft-hartly and had so power to do so
Term
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US
Definition
1964, motel refused black people but was near interstates, it was ruled to impede interstate commerce by descriminating
Term
Katzenbach v McClung
Definition
1964, ruled that a restaurant's descrimination impedes interstate commerce of some of it's food is from out of state
Term
US v Nixon
Definition
1974, Executive privilege is not absolute and not above judicial review and the rule of law
Supporting users have an ad free experience!