Term
|
Definition
- Emotional Support
- Esteem Support
- Information Support
- Instrumental Support
|
|
|
Term
What is
Emotional Support? |
|
Definition
Communication of positive regard, understanding, empathy, acceptance. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Communication of validation, respect for the person's qualities, belief in the person's abilities. |
|
|
Term
What is
Information Support? |
|
Definition
Provision of information on resources, suggesting alternative courses of action, providing advice on the problem or the person's attempts to cope. |
|
|
Term
What is
Instrumental Support? |
|
Definition
Assistance with basic self-maintenance, family and/or household; treatment and rehabilitation; assistance in work and leisure activity; financial support. |
|
|
Term
Components of the
Support Process |
|
Definition
- Stress factors - must be experiencing some level of stress
- Recipient factors - Support seeking ability; mood
- Provider factors - Empathetic abilities; mood
- Relationship factors - Satisfaction; intimacy
|
|
|
Term
Two different kinds of "face"
(Social Support and Facework) |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The desire to be accepted, respected, and to belong. |
|
|
Term
What are the
threats to Positive Face? |
|
Definition
- Concern about the impression others will have of you.
- Recipient may look weak.
- Undeesirable information may become known.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The desire for autonomy; desire not to have people impose upon you. |
|
|
Term
What are the
threats to Negative Face? |
|
Definition
- Unwanted aid can be an intrusion.
- Receiving aid may require involvement in personal areas.
- Recipient may feel obligated to take help or follow prescribed courses of action.
|
|
|
Term
What do Facework Strategies do? |
|
Definition
Minimize threats to Positive and Negative Face |
|
|
Term
Advice was the most threatening to Positive and Negative Face |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Offers posed the least threat to Positive Face |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Expressions of concern posed the least threat to Negative Face |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
What are the Assumptions of
Social Exchange Perspectives? |
|
Definition
- Primary assumption: Individuals seek to maximize their rewards and minimize their costs.
- Rewards: Anything that humans desire.
- Costs: Anything that humans wish to avoid.
|
|
|
Term
Interdependence Theory
(Thibaut & Kelley, 1959) |
|
Definition
Assumes that the action of person A has consequences for person B, and vice versa.
Hypothesis: A pair will voluntarily continue their association only if the experienced or anticipated outcomes are adequate.
Adequacy is determined by
Comparison Level (CL): What I feel I deserve (attractiveness of relation).
|
|
|
Term
What are
Message Design Logics
(O'Keefe & Delia) |
|
Definition
Based on functions messages accomplish. Argues different strategies reflect different conceptions of what "communication" is/does. |
|
|
Term
Message Design Logics strategies |
|
Definition
- Expressive - Communication is a means of self-expression. Messages are open and reactive - little attention given to other's needs/desires.
- Conventional - Communication is a "game" with rules. Messages proceed according to accepted rules/norms.
- Rhetorical - Communication is a way to change rules through negotiation. Messages are flexible, insightful & person-centered.
- Person-Centered: Reflects awareness of & adaptation to communication contexts.
|
|
|
Term
Communication Privacy Management (CPM) views on disclosure |
|
Definition
CPM views "disclosure" as the process of revealing information that is private while making decisions about what to conceal.
- Dialectical tension
- CPM's focus in on that private information we choose to disclose.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- "Public-private" dialectical tension - how do people navigate privacy.
- Conceptualization of private information - view private information as "belonging to you" & "rightfully yours"
- Privacy Rules
|
|
|
Term
What are Privacy Rules
(Assumption Maxims of CPM) |
|
Definition
CPM argues since we believe we "own" our private information, we feel we have right to control its disclosure. To do so we need a means to regulate the flow of information we define as private. Privacy rules developed using 5 criteria. |
|
|
Term
5 Criteria of Privacy Rules
(Assumptions Maxims of CPM) |
|
Definition
- Cultural criteria - Society, ethnicity, group
- Gendered criteria - Males situational appropriate, Females target is trustworthy
- Motivational criteria - Goals and needs
- Contextual criteria - e.g., divorce means different privacy rules
- Risk-benefit ratio criteria - Costs/rewards
|
|
|
Term
Interaction Maxims of CPM |
|
Definition
- Shared boundaries
- Boundary coordination
- Boundary turbulence
|
|
|
Term
Shared Boundaries
(Interaction Maxims of CPM) |
|
Definition
Once you share private information the protection of that information is truly shared. Together, you and the ceveiver create a mutual boundary around the information. |
|
|
Term
Boundary Coordination
(Interaction Maxims of CPM) |
|
Definition
3 Mechanisms
- Boundary linkages - In sharing, other may not heed boundary and 3rd party may feel even less obligated to heed boundary.
- Boundary ownership - Right, privileges and level of responsibility of co-owners.
- Boundary permeability - Refers to how open the access is to information
- Disproportionate
- Intersected
- Unified
|
|
|
Term
Boundary Turbulence
(Interaction Maxims of CPM) |
|
Definition
Lack of coordination causing violations of expectations, dilemmas, and misconceptions about ownership. |
|
|
Term
Berscheid's Approach to Emotion
Reasons people who experience emotion will seek the company of others: |
|
Definition
- Out of desire to assess appropriateness of own reaction.
- To obtain information about how to deal with cause of emotion.
- To distract themselves from emotional state.
|
|
|
Term
Schacter and Singer's (1962) 2 Component Model |
|
Definition
- Physiological arousal
- Cognitive interpretation
|
|
|
Term
Mandler's Interruption Approach |
|
Definition
- Interruption of highly organized activites and plans is the major cause of emotional experience.
- Resuming interrupted activities iis aim of emotional activity.
- Berscheid argues when we experience emotion we communicate with those that possess the power to remove the interruption.
|
|
|
Term
Emotion in Close Relationships |
|
Definition
- In close relationships, the meshing of two individuals sometimes breaks down.
- Emotions in close relationships are often result of pertner-inspired interruptions.
- Intimate others have interrupt ability power over us.
|
|
|
Term
Meshed and Unmeshed Sequences |
|
Definition
- Meshed - One person's performance facilitates the performance of the other person's behavior/plans.
- Unmeshed - There are no casual connections between the two people's behavior/plans.
- Nonmeshed - When one person's behavior interferes with the other person's behavior/plans.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Embarrassment
- Shyness
- Jealousy
|
|
|
Term
Embarrassment
(Social Emotions) |
|
Definition
- A discrepancy between self-image person wants to project and self-image that is actually projected.
- 2 Major explanations of embarrassment:
- Social evaluation - A response to threats to one's public identity and social image.
- Awkward interaction - When we feel flustered in social situations and lose a coherent script for social interaction.
- Functions of embarrassment:
- Socialization
- Social control
- Self-regulation
|
|
|
Term
Shyness
(Social Emotions) |
|
Definition
- Social anxiety + inhibition
- Cuased by anticipation of descrepancy between desired self-image and image one wants to project.
- Like embarrassment in advance.
|
|
|
Term
Jealousy
(Social Emotions) |
|
Definition
Evoked by losing important relationship to rival. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Rigid: Low adaptability
- Structured: Moderate to low adaptability
- Flexible: Moderate to high adaptability
- Chaotic: Very high adaptability
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- The emotional bonding that families have toward one another.
- Manifested in how the family structures it's time, space, and friends.
- Disengaged: Low cohesion
- Separated: Low to moderate cohesion
- Connected: Moderate to high cohesion
- Enmeshed: High cohesion
|
|
|
Term
Hills ABC-X Model of Family Stress
(Family Stress) |
|
Definition
The idea behind the model is that there are 3 factors (A, B, and C) that determine the family's experience of stress (X)
- A: The provoking or stressor event
- B: The family's resources or strengths
- C: The definition or meaning attached to the event by the family
- Communication or meaning attached to the event
- X: The level of stress or crisis experienced by the family
|
|
|