Term
|
Definition
Changing your behavior due to real or imagined influence of others. The outcomes can range from useful to tragic. |
|
|
Term
Informational social influence |
|
Definition
Behavior of others helps determine how to respond to a confusing or unusual situation. |
|
|
Term
Normative social influence |
|
Definition
Behave the way a group expects to avoid social rejection. |
|
|
Term
Baror, Vandello, Baunsman (1996) |
|
Definition
Participants in study given an ambigous task involving eyewitness indentification.
Participants in low importance condition conformed to wrong answers 35% of the time. Participants in high importance condition conformed to wrong answers 51% of the time. |
|
|
Term
Use for normative social influence |
|
Definition
When the situation is ambigious and when its important to be correct. |
|
|
Term
Informational social influence can occur when.. |
|
Definition
The situation is ambigious, when situation is a crisis (important to do things right and fast) and when others are experts. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Public compliance with group beliefs and behaviors. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Not always private compliance with group beliefs and behaviors. |
|
|
Term
Baron et al (1996) Criminal line-up |
|
Definition
High importance group conformed 16% and low importance conformed 33% of the time.
Incresing the importance to be accurate leads people to conform less to group norms. |
|
|
Term
Other reasons people are likely to conform to normative social influence |
|
Definition
Having and ally
culture (interdependent more likely to conform)
previous conformity |
|
|
Term
Schachter (1951) Johnny Rocco experiment |
|
Definition
Participants read about the delinquent and were asked to give a punishment. The confederate always disagreed, and after the group tried to get him to agree unsuccessfully, they punished the confederate by ignoring him. |
|
|
Term
Social Impact Theory
Latane (1981) |
|
Definition
People are likey to conform to normative social influences depending on:
Group strength/importance
Group immediacy-how close they are to you physically (email/phone etc)
Group size-levels out around 3-4 people
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
In an unequal power situation, submitting to the demands of the more powerful person.
Individuals have internalized a social norm of obediance. Often obey rules when authorities aren't present. |
|
|
Term
Why do ppl obey authorities?
Normitive vs. Informational |
|
Definition
Normative-Doesn't want to mess up study or get in trouble
Informational- Didn't understand, looked to expert or researcher |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Responding favorably to an explicit request by another person. |
|
|
Term
More likely to comply according to these principles: |
|
Definition
Commitment and consistancy
Reciprocation
Scarcity
Capturing and disrupting attention |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Somebody starts with a small request in order to achieve compliance with a larger request. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Comply with a low cost request and later hidden extra costs are revealed. |
|
|
Term
Bait and switch technique |
|
Definition
Drawn in with an attractive offer that is unavailable, switch to a less attractive offer that is available |
|
|
Term
Legitimization-of-paltry-favors technique |
|
Definition
Requester makes a small amount of aid acceptable. "Every penny will help". |
|
|
Term
Door-in-the-face technique |
|
Definition
Start with an inflated request and then react to a smaller request that appears to be a concession. Athough the smaller request was desired all alone.
ex: Wanting to get out of class, but will then bring up getting out early (which was the initial desire) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Making an inflated request in addition to offering a bonus or discount. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An item is in short supply. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Capture the attention of the target by making a novel request. |
|
|
Term
Disrupt-then-reframe technique |
|
Definition
Disrupts critical thinking by introducing an unexpected element, then reframes in a positive light. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Evaluations of people, objects, or ideas. |
|
|
Term
Persuasion consists of 3 componets: |
|
Definition
Affective component (feel like you don't like it)
Behavioral component (behave like you don't like it)
Cognitive component (think about if you like it) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Attitudes that we continually endorse and easily report |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Attitudes that are involuntary, uncontrollable and sometimes unconcious. |
|
|
Term
Where Attitudes come from:
Genetic Makeup vs. Social experience |
|
Definition
Genetic makeup-Inherited temerament and personality traits
Social Experience-Can influence the 3 components of attitude |
|
|
Term
Cognitive based attitudes |
|
Definition
Based on beliefs about the properties of the attitude object. Focus on relative facts. |
|
|
Term
Affectively based attitudes based on: |
|
Definition
feelings and values. Often not logical.
Sensory reactions (taste or smell)
Classical conditioning: formed associations
operant conditioning: reinforcement or punishment |
|
|
Term
Behavioral based attitudes based on: |
|
Definition
observations of how one behaves towards an attitude object |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
communication advocating a particular side of an issue. eg. a speech or an ad. |
|
|
Term
Yale attitude change approach |
|
Definition
Identifies the conditions under which people are most likely to change their attitudes in responce to persuasive messeges. |
|
|
Term
Central route of persuasion |
|
Definition
When the messesge content itself is important, and when individuals listen and think about the messege. |
|
|
Term
The peripheral route of persuasion |
|
Definition
Messege content and logic is less important
surface and superficial characteristics are important |
|
|
Term
Fear-arousing communication |
|
Definition
Persuasive messeges that attempt tp change peoples attitudes by arousing their fears. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Exposure to small doses of an argument against your position. Become immune to later, full blown attempts to change your attitude. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
When people feel that their freedom is threatened, there in an increased interest in the prohibited behavior. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The more we see and interact with people the more likely thay are to become our friends or significant others. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The more you are exposed to something the more you like it. |
|
|
Term
Gold Ryckman and Mosley (1984) Reciprical likeing |
|
Definition
Female confederates expressed interest in male participants. They talked about something but the female disagreed with them. The males liked them more, as long as they showed interest. |
|
|
Term
Snyder, Tanke and Berscheid (1977) Attractiveness |
|
Definition
Male participants were given a female researchers picture and info. They talked over the phone, and because the males thought the researcher was attractive (actually not same female) they were nicer to her. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Weight the outcome of preceived benefits/rewards to the preceived costs of a relationship to determine the outcome of the relationship. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Intense longing and physiological arousal |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Intimacy and affection. Often without passion or physiological arousal |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
(56%)
Caregivers are responsive to infants needs and show positive emotions. As adults, trust. No concern about being abandoned, viewed that you are worthy and well liked. |
|
|
Term
Avoident attachment style |
|
Definition
(25%)
Caregivers are aloof and distant, not emotionally close. As adults, supression of attachment needs, dificulty in developing intimate relationships. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
(19%)
Caregivers are inconsistant or overbearing in their affection. As adults, concern that others wont recipricate their desire for intamacy. They are quick to enter relationships and marry sooner. They tend to have many short relationships. |
|
|