Term
|
Definition
Obtain a description of the quality of relationships, actions, situations, or other phenomena. Observation, interviews and document analysis are strategies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Obtain numerical data on variables. Emphasize prediction, generalizability, and causality. Can be non-eperimental (collect data on variables) or experiemtnal (conduct to test hypthesis about effects) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Treatment or intervention. Must have at least 2 levels. Alters status of the dependent variable |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Outcome which is observed and measured. Is effected by the independent variable. |
|
|
Term
True experimental research |
|
Definition
Provides enough control to conclude that observed variability in DV is caused by variability in IV, through control of conditions, levels of variables and RANDOM ASSIGNMENT of subjects to groups. |
|
|
Term
Quasi-experimental research |
|
Definition
Cannot control assignment of subjects to groups and must use intact pre-existing groups or single treatment group. |
|
|
Term
Stratified Random Sampling |
|
Definition
If population varies in specific "strata," use stratified random sampling to ensure that each stratum is represented in the sample. Divide according to specific strata and then randomly select subjects from each stratum (age, race, education, etc.) |
|
|
Term
Three factors that cause variability in Dependent Variable. |
|
Definition
1. The Independent Variable (experimental variance) 2. Systematic error (error due to extraneous variables) 3. Random error (error due to random fluctuations in subjects, conditions, methods of measurement) |
|
|
Term
To be more certain that observed variability in DV is due to IV than error you should choose a design that... |
|
Definition
1. Maximizes variability in DV due to IV 2. Control variability due to extraneous variables 3. Minimize variability caused by random error. |
|
|
Term
Techniques to control effects of extraneous variables |
|
Definition
1. Random assignment of subjects to treatment groups. 2. Holding the extraneous variable constant. 3. Matching subjects on the extraneous variable. 4.Building the extraneous variable into the study (Blocking) 5. Statistical control of the extraneous variable |
|
|
Term
Internal validity is obtained when... |
|
Definition
...it allows an investigator to determine if there is a causal relationship between the IV and DV. |
|
|
Term
External validity is obtained when... |
|
Definition
...its findings can be generalized to other people, settings and conditions. |
|
|
Term
Four factors that threaten external validity |
|
Definition
1. Interaction between testing and treatment: pretest can sensitize to purpose of the study. 2. Interaction between selection and treatment: sample should be representative to population. 3. Reactivity: people respond in a certain way because they know they are being observed. 4. Multiple treatment interference: order or carryover effects. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Different levels of the IV to different groups to compare the DV. Main effect - effect of 1 IV on the DV Interaction - effects of 2 or more IVs considered together. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
All levels of the IV are administered sequentially to all subjects. Comparisons of different levels of IV are made within subjects rather than between subjects. |
|
|
Term
Single subject design vs. group designs |
|
Definition
1. Each single subject design includes at least 1 baseline (no treatment) phase and 1 treatment phase. Each subject acts as his own no treatment control. 2. The DV is measured repeatedly at regular intervals throughout the baseline and treatment phases. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Includes more than one baseline. Expansion includes the withdrawal of the treatment during the second and subsequent baseline phases If status on DV returns to the initial baseline level during the 2nd A phase, and then to its previous treatment level during the 2nd B phase, you can be more certain change in the DV is due to IV rather than history. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Divides variables into unordered categories If number is assigned it only acts as a label - there is no order. Limitation: only math operation performed is to count frequency of cases in each category |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Divides observations into categories and provides info on order. Can say one has more or leass or is midway. Ranks or Likert scales are examples. Limitation: cannot say 10 is twice as much as 5. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Order and equal intervals between successive points on the measurement scale. Can do addition and subtraction No absolute zero. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Most complex. Has order and equal intervals and absolute zero. Can multiple or divide so you can say one is 3 times more than another. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
More than half of the observations fall on one side of the distribution and a relatively few observations fall in the tail on the other side of the distribution. Positive or negative skew. Positive skew: most scores in negative low score side and positive tail is extended because of a few high scores. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
As the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the mean approaches a normal distribution. The mean of the sample is equal to the population mean. THe SD of the sample is equal to the SD of the population divided by the sample size. |
|
|
Term
Standard Error of the Mean |
|
Definition
The SD of the sampling distribution. Provides an estimate of the extent to which the mean of any one sample randomly drawn can be expected to vary from the population mean as a result of the sampling error. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The IV does NOT have an effect on the DV. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Opposite of the null hypothesis. The IV DOES have an effect on the DV |
|
|
Term
2 Possible alternative hypotheses |
|
Definition
1. A nondirectional (2 tailed) hypothesis means that the null hypothesis is false, but cannot determine whether it is greater or less than the parameter in the null hypothesis 2. A directional (1 tailed) hypothesis predicts whether the population parameter will be greater than or less than the null hypothesis parameter. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The size of the rejection region is defined by alpha, which is the level of significance. If alpha is .05, 5% of the sampling distribution is the rejection region and the remaining 95% s the retention region. |
|
|