Term
|
Definition
Strict modularity, innate, no overlapping |
|
|
Term
Atypical development Karmiloff-Smith 1995 |
|
Definition
Modularity develops after birth as info is recieved, gradual |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-1 in 20,000, hyperacusis, heart problem (-elastin), hypercalcemia, anxiety, hypersociability -Typical phonological rep -Problems with syntax and morphology -High vocab scores -Atypical face processing- use feature matching |
|
|
Term
WS vs. DS Klein and Mervis- McCarthur scale |
|
Definition
Verbal DS<WS DS Perceptual DS>WS Quantitative= same WS> DS verbal and numerical STM WS visuospatial < verbal STM DS viso spatial > verbal DS > block and draw a child task |
|
|
Term
WS Local level bias? Farran, Jarrold, Gathercole |
|
Definition
Navon task- Construction/block design Embedded figure test Drawing Local level bias on production but not perception |
|
|
Term
ASD Weak Central Coherence 1. Frith 1989 2. norbury 2004 |
|
Definition
1. Single deficit in processing- Perceptual- local bias Conceptual-failure to use context of prior knowledge 2. Idioms- language ability dicttates use of context not WCC. Theory of mind not predicitve of Idiom use. |
|
|
Term
ASD Executive Dysfunction Oznoff, rogers, Pennington 1991 |
|
Definition
-Wisconsin card sorting -Tower of hanoi ASD< controls |
|
|
Term
ASD- Central coherence vs. executive dysfunction Booth et al 2003 |
|
Definition
-Drawing task requiring planning - ADHD (problem with EF), ASD and typical groups -ASD= local drawing style - ASD and ADHD- planning deficits -WCC independent of Exec function |
|
|
Term
ASD- Central coherence vs. Theory of mind Jarrod et al. 2000 |
|
Definition
-TD adults, TD children, ASD -Theory of mind tasks and embedded figure block test -All groups- Poorer theory of mind = weaker central coherence. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Local level bias linked to central coherence not to executive function -Poor plannin glinked to executive dysfunction -Weak central coherence and executive dysfunction independent in visuo spatial domain - Weak central coherence linked to theory of mind deficits |
|
|
Term
Dyslexia Tim and Eleanor miles |
|
Definition
Dyslexia is a cluster of difficulties. - Bangor Dyslexia test- miles 1982 -Speed of processing -sequencing -STM -auditory perception -motor -attention |
|
|
Term
SRD Discrepancy definition |
|
Definition
2 standard deviations/ 5th centile -Possible extension: poor phonological processing, discrepancy reading and listenign comprehension |
|
|
Term
Possible Causes of Dyslexia |
|
Definition
-Biological: genetic, sensory -Cognitive: poor working memory, phonological processing -Environmental: poor teaching -Developmental contingent: causal chain- brain, cognition, behaviour + environment -Grapheme/phoneme correspondence |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Beginning Reader model - symbolic - logographic (sight) - alphabetic (graph/phon correspondence) - orthographic (auto) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-No use of sight words early on -Prealphabetic - patial alphabetic (context/phoetic cue reading) - full alphabetic (novel word reading, analogy, sight) - consolidated (multi letter untis |
|
|
Term
The Mature reader- Frith /Ehri |
|
Definition
-Automatically identifies words -Connects sight/sound/meaning - Finds it difficutl to ignore menaign (stroop) -Able to focus on meaning -Novel words by decoding, anaology, or predicting |
|
|
Term
Bradley and Bryant- Dyslexia study |
|
Definition
-Rhyming and alliteration training -Largest difference phonemic and letter practice -More than just phonemic -Only 25% poor readers predicted by phonemic info -Some scored low and went on to read well |
|
|
Term
Dyslexia- Cognitve approach 1.Phonological processing 2. Short term memory 3. Goswanir and Swan |
|
Definition
1.Problem with processing: rhyming, alliteration, oddity 2.Slower speech= slower rehearsal rate=poor phonological coding=poor ability to form mental reps 3. Verbal naming deficits- SRD could describe poor readers could not=ok semantic rep. |
|
|
Term
Dyselxia- Biological model |
|
Definition
-Father dyslxic - 50% son only 40% mother -MZ twins more likely -Boys 4x more likely -Chromosomes |
|
|
Term
Dyselxia- Biological 1.Talla 2.Stein |
|
Definition
1. Tallal- infants problems with rapid auditory - not replicated 2. Magnocellular deficit, 2/3 worse at detecing motion, dorsal system |
|
|
Term
Dyslexia Biological- Cerebellar deficit 1. Nicholson and Fawcett 2. Wimmer |
|
Definition
1.Movement/balance -Poor articulation affects phon rep. -Automaticity mediated by cerebellum 2. Exclude ADHD effect not shown, no single word problems in ADHD |
|
|
Term
Dyslexia- Cognitive 2 1. Rapid automized naming 2. Wolf and Bowers 3. Snowling 2000 4. Bishop-Snowling |
|
Definition
- slower= poor phonological rep. linked to being able to automatize reading -problems in both- areas alphabetic and orthographic -Verbal repitition non words probelm, no probelm in auditory discrimination= problem anayzing speech sounds -General language problems: Families of children with SLI mor elikely to have SRD.- Good lang may help those at risk |
|
|