Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Omission/Commission Crimes |
|
Definition
Omission-Statutory created Duty Commission-Relationship(parent), Contractual, Voluntary Assumption(begin rescue) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Implied MR for knowingly, D knew there was a risk but purposely didn't investigate. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Intent Knowingly Recklessly Negligently |
|
|
Term
Heat of Passion vs. Extreme Emotional Disturbance |
|
Definition
Both reduce intentional murder to manslaughter; Differences: (MPC) Broader More subjective(through Rx person in D's eyes) Does not require sudden quarrel or reaction but substitutes long-term brooding |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Killing of a person with malice aforethought, which is found by: Intent to kill Intent to inflict serious bodily injury Wanton or reckless disregard for value of human life(depraved heart) intent to commit felony
WITHOUT provocation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Common Law-Any death or certain deaths in commission of felony are murder- most states retain in some form MPC- Rejected but allows for presumption of recklessness for certain felonies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
purposely, knowlingly, recklessly(depraved heart) No malice aforethought No degrees |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Voluntary Homicide-but downgraded due to provocation("heat of passion") Involuntary-Reckless(lesser degree), negligent, or maybe misdemeanor |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
C/L-"heat of passion" No time to cool off Words alone not enough
MPC-"intense emotional disturbance" broader meaning more subjective (Rx person in post.) no cooling time, allows for brooding |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Broader Provocation "intense emotional disturbance" No voluntary/involuntary distinction No negligence, bc MPC has separate negligent homicide |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
C/L - Fetus must be born alive/one breath for liability Some expansion to whether fetus is viable(can live outside womb) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Now: Cessation of all brain functions Past: Cessation of heart and respiratory functions |
|
|
Term
3rd Party Liable for Homicide if: |
|
Definition
Had a duty to stop it or helped create the circumstances. But in genuine suicide pact might be held to aiding and abetting(esp. MPC) |
|
|
Term
Building Blocks of insanity |
|
Definition
Cognitive incapacity- can't understand the result/gravity of actions Moral-Dont know the act is wrong VOlitional- Regardless of what you think cannot control or stop yourself Product |
|
|
Term
McNaughton Test (insanity) |
|
Definition
No responsibility if D's disease of mind caused volitional incapacity(don't know result/gravity) OR moral incapacity(didnt know it was wrong) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Mental disease/defect and lacks substantial certainty either to appreciate wrongfulness(moral) OR to conform conduct to law (volitional) |
|
|
Term
points where mental illness relevant |
|
Definition
Must be competent to stand trial, will put in institution until ready Sentencing- must be sane at time of execution Time of act- use as defense if insane at time of crime |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Asserts insanity as failure of proof of MR as opposed to traditional- total defense |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Yes I did it but I have an excuse why- Duress, Compulsion, Coercion. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Crime was a PRODUCT of mental disease/defect- outdated |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Institutionalized until his mental health rebounds, then serve remainder of sentence |
|
|
Term
Affirmative Defenses: Justification |
|
Definition
act was not wrong under the circumstances. |
|
|
Term
Affirmative Defenses: Excuses |
|
Definition
Actor was not blameworthy under the circumstances |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Can be acquitted of anything except murder if other person threatened to use deadly force against actor or other person unless crime committed.Conditions must not have exposed self to threat Deadly force, present and imminent must have reasonable belief it could be carried out. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Excuses crime if person was coerced by threat to use physical force against him or another unless person recklessly put himself in the situation no imminency required doesn't have to be deadly person of reasonable firmness would have committed can be used for homicide |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a. The intervener would be justified in using such force herself if the facts were as she believed them to be b. If the facts were as the intervener believed them, the third party would be justified in using force c. The intervener believes force is necessary to protect the third person. d. If the third person would be required to retreat the intervener has a duty to retreat |
|
|
Term
C/L self defense elements |
|
Definition
Can use force when: Reasonable Belief That use of force is necessary To defend self(or 3rd party) against agressors imminent use of unlawful force |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Generally not a defense for assault or battery in common law- no mentally competent person would consent, and its about People v. Def., general interest not to have people beating people up |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Choice of evils, choose lesser evil acted to prevent imminent harm reasonably anticipated direct causal relationship of harm to be averted No alternatives to violating law |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Objective approach employed methods of persuasion or inducement which created a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by persons other than those who are already ready to commit it. Look at gov. actions and see if they would have convinced regular person to commit crime |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. Predisposition to commit the crime prior to committing crime ii. If police conduct is not what caused the person to commit crime or defendant was predisposed to commit the crime before police interaction then not entrapment 1. Focuses on mens rea prior to crime, gov must prove predisposition |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1. actor does all necessary to commit but is somehow unsuccesful 2. has passed beyond preparation although it has been interrupted before taking last acts |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Act Recklessly but do not harm anyone |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
recklessly=wanton negligently= reckless |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
i. Intent to commit substantive crime ii. Commands, encourages or requests another to join him in commission of crime |
|
|