Term
OVERVIEW:
Essential Elements of Crimes
|
|
Definition
- Physical Act
- Mental State
- Causation
- Concurrence
|
|
|
Term
OVERVIEW:
Inchoate ("Incomplete") Offenses
|
|
Definition
- Solicitation
- Conspiracy
- Attempt
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Insanity
- Intoxication
- Infancy
- Self-Defense
- Durres
- Entrapment
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- TERRITORIAL: Crime may be prosecuted in any state where an act that was part of the crime took place OR any state where the result took place
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Elements of a Crime: proseuction must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Defenses: Once defense is raised by D, PROSECUTION must disprove each element of the defense beyond a reasonable doubt.
- CL Exception: Insanity defense must be proven by D by preponderance of evidence.
- NY Distinctions: NY divides defenses into 2 types
- Defenses: P must disprove beyond reasonble doubt
- Affirmative Defenses: D must prove each element by preponderance of evidence
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Felony = crimes that may be punished by more than one year in prison.
- Misdemeanor = crime for which maximum imprisonment may not exceed one year in prison
|
|
|
Term
Physical Act Requirement
(essential element of crimes)
|
|
Definition
- RULE: Ordinarily, if you don't have an act, there is no crime.
- Act = voluntary bodily movement
- Involuntary movements =/= act
- e.g. sleep walking, reflex, convulsion, when someone else moves defendant
|
|
|
Term
Physical Act Requirement
OMISSIONS RULE
|
|
Definition
- In limited situations, failures to act CAN be basis for criminal liability...
- Three Requirements for Omissions Liability:
- Legal Duty to Act (created in 1 of 5 ways):
- by statute, contract, status relationship, voluntary assumption of care, beginning to give assistance, peril created by D
- Knowledge of the Facts giving rise to duty
- Ability to help
|
|
|
Term
MENTAL STATES (CL)
(essential element to crimes)
|
|
Definition
- 4 common law mental states:
- Specific Intent: crime requires not just desire to do act but also desire to achieve the result
- Malice: when D acts intentionally or with reckless disregard of an obvious/known risk
- General Intent (most common): D need only be generally aware of the factors constituting the crime... need not intend a specific result
- Strict Liability: when crime simply requires doing the act; no mental state needed
|
|
|
Term
CL MENTAL STATES
SPECIFIC INTENT CRIMES
|
|
Definition
- Assault (result = injury)
- 1st degree murder
- Larceny (result = to steal)
- False Pretenses
- Robbery
- Embezzlement
- Forgery
- Burglary
- Solicitation
- Conspiracy
- Attempt
|
|
|
Term
MENTAL STATES (CL)
MISTAKE of FACT
|
|
Definition
- Rule: Whether a D's mistake of fact = defense depends on the mental state for the crime and whether the mistake is un/reasonable.
- Reasonble mistakes = defense to ANY crime EXCEPT strict liability crimes.
- Unreasonble mistakes are defenses ONLY to specific intent crimes.
|
|
|
Term
MENTAL STATES (CL)
MISTAKE of LAW
|
|
Definition
- Rule: Mistake of LAW is NEVER a defense to crime.
- Exceptions:
- statute specifically makes knowledge of law an element
- law not published
- D's reasonable reliance on statute/judicial decision declared unconsti, official interpretation/advice from someone charged w/ enforcement, administration or interpretation of the law (not private atty)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Intentionally/Purpose: When D's conscious objective = to accomplish a particular result
- Knowingly: D = aware of what he is doing
- Recklessly: D = aware of AND consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk
- Negligently: D should have known of a substantial and unjustifiable risk
- totally objective standard
|
|
|
Term
MENTAL STATES
New York MISTAKE of FACT
|
|
Definition
- Rule: Where mistake of fact negates the required mental state, it is a DEFENSE.
- Applications:
- Crimes of negligence: only a REASONABLE mistake will be a defense
- SL crimes: mistake NEVER a defense.
|
|
|
Term
NY MENTAL STATES
Mistake of LAW
|
|
Definition
Rule: Mistake of LAW is NEVER A DEFENSE |
|
|
Term
CAUSATION
(essential element to crimes)
|
|
Definition
- Actual Causation ("but for" causation): D = the actual cuase IF the bad results would not have happened but for D's conduct
- Accelerating Causes = actual cause
- e.g. shooting one who already has a fatal wound = actual cause of death
- Proximate (or legal) Causation: D = proximate cause if bad result is a natural and probable consequence of D's conduct
- Key Concepts: foreseeability and fairness
- Eggshell Victim: D = proximate cause even if victim's preexisting weakness contributed to the bad result
- Intervening Causes: D =/= proximate cause if intervening events cause the bad result
- BUT: Hospital negligence/malpractice = foreseeable result
|
|
|
Term
CONCURRENCE
(essential element to crimes)
|
|
Definition
- D must have the required mental state AT THE TIME HE ENGAGES IN THE CRIMINAL ACT
- Application: Most frequently arises w/ two crimes - LARCENY and BURGLARY
|
|
|
Term
Crimes against the PERSON
(Assault and Battery)
COMMON LAW
|
|
Definition
- Battery: Unlawful application of force to another resulting in either bodily injury or offensive touching
- general intent (to do the touch, not the harm)
- Assault (specific intent): 2 versions
- Attempted Battery (i.e. swing and miss)
- Intentional creation other than by mere words of a reasonable apprehension in mind of victim of bodily harm
- Aggravated Assault/Battery: assault/battery +
- use of weapon,
- victim = child, elderly, handicapped OR
- intent to commit robbery/rape
|
|
|
Term
Crimes against the PERSON
(Assault )
NEW YORK
|
|
Definition
- Definition: Intentionally causing physical injury to another person.
- Degrees of Assault:
- 1st degree: 2nd degree assult + weapon
- 2nd: intentionally causing serious physical injury
- 3rd: intentionally causing physical injury
- NOTE: Battery not separate crime in NY; all degrees of assault require physical injury
|
|
|
Term
Crimes against the PERSON
(HOMICIDE)
Year and a Day Rule
|
|
Definition
- CL: Year and a Day Rule: Death must occur w/i a year-and-a-day of the homicidal act for D to be charged w/ homicide.
- NY/Majority: Death may occur at any time.
|
|
|
Term
Crimes against the PERSON
(HOMICIDE)
Common Law / Multistate
|
|
Definition
- CL Homicide Crimes:
- Murder
- Voluntary Manslaughter
- Involuntary Manslaughter
- Felony Murder
|
|
|
Term
MURDER
Common Law / Multistate
|
|
Definition
- Defined: Causing death of another person (born alive) with MALICE aforethought
- Malice Aforethoguht =
- Intent to Kill
- Use of deadly weapon creates inference of intent to kill
- Intent to Inflict Great Bodily Harm or Serious Physical Injury
- Extreme Recklessness or Depraved Indifference Murder; or
- Felony Murder
- Transferred Intent: If D intends to harm one person but accidentally harms a different victim instead, D's intent is transferred from intended to actual victim.
|
|
|
Term
MURDER: Statutory Variations
Common Law / Multistate
|
|
Definition
- 1st Degree Murder: 2 variations
- Intentional...
- Any killing committed with pre-meditation and
- D previously thought about it
- deliberation
- (D was cool, calm, collected)
- Felony Murder:
- Killing committed during commission of certain enumerated felonies = 1st degree murd.
- 2nd Degree Murder = all other murders
|
|
|
Term
VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
Common Law / Multistate
|
|
Definition
- DEFINED:
- An intentional killing
- committed in the heat of passion
- after adequate provocation
- provoation that would arouse sudden & intense passion in mind of ordinary person; + lack of time for D to cool off
- mere words NOT sufficient
- e.g. finding spouse in bed w/ another
|
|
|
Term
INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
Common Law / Multistate
|
|
Definition
- A killing committed w/ criminal negligence, OR
- A killing committed during a crime if not felony murder ("misdemeanor manslaughter")
|
|
|
Term
FELONY MURDER
Common Law / Multistate
|
|
Definition
- DEFINED: Any death caused in the commission of or attempt to commit a felony.
- Degree:
- Intentional Killing = 1st degree murder
- Unintentional Killing = 2nd degree murder
- Limitaitons:
- D must be guilty of felony...
- that is inherently dangerous
- and separate from the killing itself,
- killing must be during felony or immediate flight from the felony...
- in furtherance of the felony
- death must be foreseeable
- victim must NOT be a CO-FELON
- Vicarious Liability: If one co-felon = proximate cause of a death, all co-felons = guilty of felony murder (even if killing is by 3rd party)
|
|
|
Term
HOMICIDE CRIMES
(New York)
|
|
Definition
- 1st Degree Murder
- 2nd Degree Murder
- 1st Degree Manslaughter
- 2nd Degree Manslaughter
- Criminally Negligent Homicide
|
|
|
Term
1st Degree MURDER
New York
|
|
Definition
- Elements:
- Intent to kill +
- D = at least 18 years old +
- At least one aggravating factor:
- victim = police officer
- killing for witness intimidation
- murder-for-hire
- 2 or more victims
- intentional killing during serious felony
|
|
|
Term
2nd Degree MURDER
New York
|
|
Definition
- 3 Forms:
- Intent to Kill (premediation + deliberation = irrelevant in NY)
- Extreme Recklessness (Depraved Indifference Murder)
- "Utter Disregard for Human Life"
- Genearlly, act must put more than one person in danger.
- NOT Applicable to one-on-one killings UNLESS involves torture or abandoning helpless victim to almost certain death
- Felony Murder (similar to CL rule)
- Underlying Felonies (BRAKES)
- burglary, robbery, arson, kidnapping, escape, sexual assault
- D need not be convicted of underlying felony (if sufficient evidence he committed the felony)
- Non-slayer defense: Affirmative defense to felony murder if D can prove by preponderance of evidence...
- D did not do killing
- did not have a deadly weapon
- had no reason to believe his co-felons had deadly weapons, AND
- no reason to believe co-felons intended to do anything likely to result in death
|
|
|
Term
1st Degree MANSLAUGHTER
New York
|
|
Definition
- 2 Forms:
- Intent to cause serious physical injury, OR
- Extreme emotional disturbance
- "intent'l killing committed under influence of reasonable extreme emotional disturbance"
- Affirmative Defense to 2nd Degree Murder
|
|
|
Term
2nd Degree MANSLAUGHTER
New York
|
|
Definition
- RECKLESS act that results in death...
- D = aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death
|
|
|
Term
OTHER HOMICIDE OFFENSES
New York
|
|
Definition
- Aggravated Homicide: When victim = police officer killed in line of duty, tack "aggravated" to whatever the underlying charge is
- Vehicular Homicide: Death caused by drunk driving (BAC over .08%)
- 1st d. Vehic Mansl: Death + DWI + Aggravating factor (over .18 or past DWI)
- 2nd d. Vehic Mansl: Death + DWI
- Agg Vehic Man: 1st d. vehic mansl + reckless driving
|
|
|
Term
CONFINEMENT OFFENSES
CL/MS
|
|
Definition
- False Imprisonment: Unlawful confinement of a person w/o consent
- Kidnapping: False imprisonment + either...
- moving the victim, or
- concealing the victim in a secret place
- Aggravated Kidnapping: Kidnapping +
- purpose to collect ransom,
- purpose to commit rape; or
- victim = child
|
|
|
Term
CONFINEMENT OFFENSES
Unlawful Imprisonment
New York
|
|
Definition
- Unlawful Imprisonment:
- 2nd Degree: Unlawfully restraining someone + w/o their consent + w/ knowledge that the restriction is unlawful
- thus, mistake of law IS a DEFENSE
- 1st Degree: 2nd Degree + risk of serious physical injury
|
|
|
Term
CONFINEMENT OFFENSES
Kidnapping
New York
|
|
Definition
- 2nd Degree: Abducting someone
- 1st Degree: 2nd degree PLUS one of the following
- ransom,
- restraint of victim for more than 12 hours,
- death of victim
- If accidental: 2nd degree felony murder
- If intentional: 1st degree murder
|
|
|
Term
SEX OFFENSES
MS + New York
|
|
Definition
- Forcible Rape:
- Sex w/o consent
- accomplished by force, threat of force, or victim = unconscious
- Mental State = general intent
- Statutory Rape:
- sex w/ someone under age of consent
- Mental State:
- Majority: Strict Liability
- MPC/Minority: reasonable mistake of age = defense
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Larceny: Trepassory taking and carrying away of the personal property of another with INTENT to STEAL
- Trespassory = wrongful/without permission
- Intent to Steal = keep permanently
- Erroneous Taking: Taking under a claim of right is NEVER larceny.
- Continuing Trespass: If D wrongfully takes property but w/o intent to keep permanently but later develops such intent, the initial trespass considered to have continued and D = guilty of larceny
|
|
|
Term
CL THEFT CRIMES
EMBEZZLEMENT
|
|
Definition
- Embezzlement = Conversion of property of another person already in D's lawful possession w/ INTENT to DEFRAUD.
- Mental State = Specific Intent
- Note: If D intends to return the property in same form then no intent to defraud (BUT: money not considered fungible)
- Possession = more than mere custody, requires authority to exercise discretion over the property
|
|
|
Term
CL THEFT CRIMES
FALSE PRETENSES
|
|
Definition
- Obtaining title to property of another by an intentional false stmt with INTENT to defraud.
- Title not just temporary possession.
- False Stmt must be of a present misstatement of fact (not future promise)
|
|
|
Term
CL THEFT CRIMES
LARCENY BY TRICK
|
|
Definition
- D obtains ONLY possession as a result of intentional false stmt with intent to defraud.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Larceny..
- from another's person or presence
- by force or threat of immediate injury.
- Force = sufficient to overcome resistance (e.g. NOT lifting a wallet out of a pocket. ripping a chian off IS sufficient0
- Threats = of immediate injury... (otherwise, crime = extortion/blackmail)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- DEFINED: Any crime that would be larceny, embezzlement, false pretenses or larceny by trick at CL = larceny in NY.
- Degrees of Larceny:
- 1st: more than $1M
- 2nd: more than $500k
- 3rd: more than $3,000
- 4th: more than $1k
- Petit Larceny: less than $1000
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- 3rd degree: Forcible stealing (Larceny + Force)
- 2nd degree: forcible stealing + one of...
- D = aided by another actually present
- victim is injured
- car is stolen
- 1st degree: forcible stealing + one of...
- victim is seriously injured
- D uses/displays a firearm
- Affirm defense: If D can prove gun was unloaded/inoperable, crime reduced to 2nd degree
|
|
|
Term
MISCELLANEOUS
THEFT RELATED CRIMES
|
|
Definition
- FORGERY = making or altering, a writing, so that it is default, w/ INTENT to defraud
- UTTERING = offering as genuine, a forged instrument, w/ INTENT to defraud
- MALICIOUS MISCHIEF = destroyring/damaging someone else's property
|
|
|
Term
POSSESSION OFFENSES
General
|
|
Definition
- The Act: "Possession"
- DEFINED: Control for a period of time long enough to have an opportunity to terminate possession.
- Constructive Possession: contraband need not be in D's actual physical possession so long as close enough for him to exercise dominion and control over it
- Mental State: KNOWLEDGE (of possession AND of the character the item possessed)
|
|
|
Term
HABITATION OFFENSES
CL BURGLARY
|
|
Definition
- CL: Breaking & entering, dwelling of another, at night, w/ INTENT to commit felony inside
- Breaking = creating/enlargening an opening by force
- Entry = any part of D's body entered building
- Dwelling = bldg where people regularly sleep
- Specific Intent
|
|
|
Term
HABITATION OFFENSES
NEW YORK BURGLARY
|
|
Definition
- 3rd degree: entering or remaining, unlawfully, in a building, with intent to commit a crime inside
- 2nd degree: 3rd degree + one of:
- D carries a weapon
- Non-participant is injured
- Building = dwelling
- 1st degree: D knows he is burglarizing a dwelling AND...
- non-participant injured, OR
- D carries a weapon
|
|
|
Term
HABITATION OFFENSES
CL ARSON
|
|
Definition
- Defined: Malicious burning of a building
- Mental staet = malicious (intentional/reckless disregard of a known risk)
- Burning = material wasting of the structure (scorching NOT sufficient)
|
|
|
Term
HABITATION OFFENSES
NEW YORK ARSON
|
|
Definition
- 4th degree: reckless burning of a building
- 3rd degree: intentional burning of a building
- 2nd degree: 3rd degree + D knows/should know someone was inside the building
- 1st degree: 2nd degree + explosive device
|
|
|
Term
ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY
Act and Mental State Required
|
|
Definition
- "ACT" Requirement: Aiding or encouraging the principal
- Mere presence/knowledge does NOT make someone an accomplice
- NY: mere knowledge can make someone guilty of lesser crime criminal facilitation
- Mental State: With the INTENT that the crime be committed
- NY: Accomplice need only INTEND to aid P's conduct and share P's mental state
- Thus, possible in NY to be accomplice to negligent/reckless crime
|
|
|
Term
ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY
SCOPE of Liability
|
|
Definition
- Accomplice = guilty of...
- all crimes he aided/encouraged as if he did it
- all other foreseeable crimes committed along with the aided crime
- UNPROSECUTED P: Accomplice is liable even where P is not prosecuted or has an individual defense (e.g. insanity)
|
|
|
Term
ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY
WITHDRAWAL
|
|
Definition
- Encourager: Accomplice who only encouraged P may withdraw by discouraging P BEFORE the crime is commmitted
- Aider: Accomplice who actually helped P must EITHER neutralize the assitance OR prevent the crime's commission (e.g. by calling cops)
- NY: RENUNCIATION
- Affirmative defense to accomplice liability
- Accomplice must make a subst'l effort to prevent the commisison of the crime
|
|
|
Term
ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY
ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT
|
|
Definition
- CL: To commit separate offense of being an accessory D must...
- assit P who has committed felony,
- with knowledge the crime has been committed, AND
- w/ INTENT to help P avoid arrest/conviction
- NY: Called hindering the prosecution
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
SOLICITATION
|
|
Definition
- DEFINED: Asking someone to commit a crime with the intent that it be committed.
- Mental State: SPECIFIC INTENT
- Completion of the crime = UNNECESSARY for liability... the crime is in the asking/solicitation
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
CONSPIRACY
|
|
Definition
- Defined: An agreement b/w two or more people to commit a crime PLUS an overt act in furtherance of the crime.
- Overt act = any act no matter how small
- Mental State = SPECIFIC INTENT to accomplish conspiracy's objective
- One-Person Conspiracy:
- NY/MPC: Yes... 1 peson conspiracy = possible... thus D may be guilty even if all co-conspirators acquitted or just pretending to agree
- CL: NO... need two guilty minds for a conspiracy... thus if other party pretending or acquitted, last remaining D cannot be convicted
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
CONSPIRACY... Vicarious Liability
|
|
Definition
- Vicarious Liability:
- CL: In addition to conspiracy, D = liable for OTHER crimes committed by his co-conspirators so long as those crimes...
- were in furtherance of conspiracy's objectives, AND
- were foreseeable
- NY: No VL for crimes committed by co-conspirators
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
ATTEMPT
|
|
Definition
- The ACT:
- MPC/Majority: Conduct that is a subst'l stepstrongly corroborative towards the crime and of a crim purpose
- CL/NY: Conduct that gets dangerously close to the commission of a crime
- Mental State: SPECIFIC INTENT to commit the crime
- Thus, CANNOT attempt unintentional crimes
- BUT: Can attempt malice/general intent/ SL crimes... ONLY if D specifically intends to commit the crime
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
ATTEMPT & IMPOSSIBILITY
|
|
Definition
- Factual Impossibility: NOT a DEFENSE to Attempt
- Defined: Claim that it was impossible to complete the crime b/c some circumstance was beyond D's control.
- Test: If facts were as D believed, would he be guilty of a crime? If YES, then D = guilty of attempt.
- Legal Impossibility: Legal Impossibility IS a DEFENSE to attempt.
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
WITHDRAWAL, RENUNCIATION, ABANDONMENT
|
|
Definition
- NY/MPC: Withdrawal IS a defense but ONLY IF:
- D voluntarily and completely renounces the solicitation/conspiracy/attempt AND
- renunciation is based on a change of heart and not mere fear of failing/being caught
- CL: Withdrawal is NEVER a defense
- BUT once D withdraws, no longer vicariously liable for crimes committed by co-conspirators after he left the conspiracy
|
|
|
Term
Inchoate Offenses:
MERGER
|
|
Definition
- When can D be convicted of separate crimes for same act?
- Rule for Lesser Included Offenses
- Lesser included offenses merge with the greater offenses.
- Lesser Included Offenses = offense necessarily part of greater offense...
- offenses where every element is also an element of the greater offense
- e.g. Larceny = lesser included offense will merge with the greater offense
- Rule for Inchoate Offenses:
- Attempt: merges w/ complete crime
- Conspiracy: does NOT merge w/ completed crime
- Solicitation:
- CL: Merges
- NY: Does NOT merge
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
The 6 Defenses Listed...
|
|
Definition
- Insanity
- Intoxication
- Infancy
- Self-Defense
- Duress
- Entrapment
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
Capacity Defenses: INSANITY
|
|
Definition
- 2 Elements for Insanity Defense:
- D must have a mental disease, AND
- Apply 1 of the following tests to determine if disease renders D legally insane:
- NY: D = insane if lacked the substantial capacity to either:
- understand the nature of his act, OR
- appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct
- Affirmative Defense
- M'Naughten: If D either
- did not know his act was wrong, or
- did not understand the nature of his act
- Irresistible Impulse Test: If D either
- was unable to control his actions,or
- appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct.
- MPC (combines previous two)
- If D lacked the subst'l capacity to either..
- appreciate the criminality of his conduct, or
- conform his conduct to the law.
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
Capacity Defenses:
Distinguishing INSANITY v. INCOMPETENCY
|
|
Definition
- Insanity: Issue = whether D insane at time of CRIME.
- Incompetency: Issue = whether D mentally ill at time of TRIAL.
- If yes: trial is postponed until D is competent.
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
Capacity Defenses:
INTOXICATION
|
|
Definition
- Involuntary Intoxication:
- Defense to ANY crime
- Treated as a MENTAL ILNESS,
- So, apply insanity test to determine if applicable
- Key: must be completely INVOLUNTARY
- NY: Voluntary Intoxication
- CAN be a defense to intent and knowledge crimes, if the intoxication prevents D from forming the required intent
- CANNOT be a defense to crimes of recklesness, negligence, SL.
- MS: Voluntary Intoxication:
- CAN be a defense to specific intent crimes, if the intoxication prevents D from forming the specific intent
- CANNOT be a defense to malice, general intent, SL crimes
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
Capacity Defenses:
INFANCY
(New York)
|
|
Definition
- NY: If age is...
- < 13: Crim prosecution as adult is NOT allowed... only juvenile proceedings in Fam Ct
- 13+: crim prosecution as adult allowed for 2nd degree murder
- 14+: crim prosecution as adult allowed for serious crimes against persons/property
- 16+: crim proseuction as adult allowed for any crime (except 1st degree murder)
- 18+: crim prosecution as adult for 1st degree murder permitted
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
Capacity Defenses:
INFANCY
(CL)
|
|
Definition
- If age is...
- < 7: Prosecution NOT allowed
- < 14: Reputtable presumption against prosecution
- 14+: Prosecution as adult is permissible
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
SELF-DEFENSE
Rule for Non-Deadly Force
|
|
Definition
- RULE for Non-Deadly Force: D may use non-deadly force in self-defense if it is...
- reasonably necessary
- to protect against an imminent use
- of unlawful force against himself
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
SELF-DEFENSE
Rule for Deadly Force
|
|
Definition
- RULE for Deadly Force: D may use deadly force in self-defense if he is facing an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm
- Aggressor Rule: D may NOT use deadly force if he was initial aggressor
- BUT: D may regain right to use deadly self-defense if
- the aggressor withdraws AND communicates that withdrawal to the victim, or
- (MS ONLY): the victim suddenly escalates a non-deadly fight into a deadly fight
- Retreat Rule:
- MAJORITY: Retreat NOT required before using deadly self-defense
- NY/Minority: Retreat IS required, unless D
- cannot retreat in complete safety, or
- is in his house (castle exception)
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
SELF-DEFENSE
Reasonableness & Mistake
|
|
Definition
- What happens when D is mistaken about need to use self-defense?
- Reasonable Mistake: Defense still applicable
- Unreasonble Mistake:
- CL/NY: NO DEFENSE
- Minority/MPC: Imperfect self-defense (murder reduced to voluntary manslaughter)
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
SELF-DEFENSE
Use of Force to Prevent a Crime
|
|
Definition
- Non-deadly Force may be used if necesary to prevent any crime.
- Deadly force may only be used to prevent a felony risking human life.
- NY: Deadly force may be used to prevent rape, roberry, arson, kidnapping, burglary; retreat NOT required
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
DEFENSE of OTHERS
|
|
Definition
- D may use force/deadly force to protect others the same as he could use it to defend himself.
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
DEFENSE of PROPERTY
|
|
Definition
- General Rule: Deadly force may NOT be used to defend property.
- Burglary Rule: Deadly force may be used to prevent a burglary if D is inside his own home.
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
SELF-DEFENSE
RESISTING ARREST
|
|
Definition
- If D knows/reasonably should know the person performing the arrest is a police officer...
- MBE/Maj.: If arrest is unlawful, D MAY use non-deadly force to resist the arresting officer.
- NY: Force may NOT be used to resist UNLESS arresting officer uses EXCESSIVE force.
|
|
|
Term
DEFENSES
NECESSITY DEFENSE
|
|
Definition
- CL Rule: It is a defense to criminal conduct if D reasonably believed that conduct was necessary to prevent greater harm.
- EXCEPTION: Necessity is NEVER a defense to homicide.
- NY: Harm avoided must be greater than harm caused.
- Necessity CAN be a defense to homicide.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Rule: It is a defense if D was forced to commit the crime under a threat of death/serious bodily injury.
- CL Exception: Duress can NOT be a defense to HOMICIDE.
- NY: Duress CAN be a DEFENSE to HOMICIDE
- Duress = Affirmative Defense
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Defined: G'vt unfairly tempted D to commit the crime
- VERY NARROW
- Only a defense if...
- criminal design originated w/ gvt, and
- D was not predisposed to commit the crime
- NY: Entrapment = affirmative defense.
|
|
|