Term
Schmitter and Karl definition of democracy |
|
Definition
a system of governance in which rulers are accountable for their actions in the public realm by citizens, acting indirectly through the competition and cooperation of their elected officials |
|
|
Term
7 elements of Ronald Dahl's "polyarchy" |
|
Definition
1) Decisions about policy are vested in elected officials 2) Frequent and fairly conducted elections 3) right to vote for practically all adults 4) right to run for practically all adults 5) Citizens have rights to express themselves without punishment 6) CItizens have right to seek out alternative sources of information 7) Citizens have right to form relatively independent associations or organizations |
|
|
Term
Schmitter and Karl "procedural minimum" conditions for democracy |
|
Definition
All 7 of Ronald Dahl's elements of polyarchy plus 1) Elected officials can exercise constitutional powers without subjecting to overriding opposition from unelected officials 2) Must be self-governing (In other words, it must act independently from an overarching political system |
|
|
Term
11 Ways democracies differ by Schmitter and Karl |
|
Definition
1) Consensus 2) Participation 3) Access 4) Responsiveness 5) Majority rule 6) Parliamentary sovereignty 7) party government 8) Pluralism 9) Federalism 10) Presidentialism 11) Checks and Balances |
|
|
Term
Schmitter and Karl: 4 Things Democracies are not |
|
Definition
1) Not necessarily more economic efficient 2) Not necessarily more efficient administratively 3) Not likely to appear more orderly or stable than autocracy |
|
|
Term
Zakaria definition of democracy |
|
Definition
elections must be open and fair, and this requires some protections for freedom of speech and assembly |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Define concepts 2) Operationalize concept 3) Use comparative method |
|
|
Term
Ragin's definition of the comparative method |
|
Definition
the comparison of large macro social units with the goal of explaining and interpreting macrosocial variation |
|
|
Term
Schmitter and Karl concepts of democracy |
|
Definition
1) public realm 2) citizens 3) competition 4) election 5) majority rule 6) Numbers meet intensities 7) Cooperation 8) Representative 9) Regime |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Randomize assigns cases to either treatment group or control |
|
|
Term
Three types of scientific methods |
|
Definition
Experimental, Statistical, Comparative |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Does with math what we do with randomizing in the experimental method 2) Random selection rather than random assignment |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a cause is truly a cause when the outcome is present if and only if the cause is present |
|
|
Term
1) Reason in support of probabilistic causation |
|
Definition
1)accounts for measurement error and general random nature of world |
|
|
Term
Mill's Methods of Agreement (Def, 3 Weaknesses) |
|
Definition
1)if two or more cases have only one circumstance in common, than that circumstance is the cause of the given phenomenon Weaknesses 1) No variation on dependent variable 2) Chance of reverse causation 3) Doesn't explain multiple causation |
|
|
Term
Mill's Method of Difference (Def, 1 Strength, Weaknesses) |
|
Definition
1) if two or more cases have nearly every circumstance in common except for one, and experience different outcomes, the circumstance in which they differ is the cause of the variation of outcomes Strengths 1) if it is known that the outcome occurs after the circumstance, than cause and effect can be satisfied Weaknesses 1) case selection 2) Reverse causation if order of outcome and circumstance is unknown 3) Multiple causation |
|
|
Term
Comparative Method is good at (2): |
|
Definition
1) making arguments sensitive to context 2) teasing out causally complex processes |
|
|
Term
4 Drawbacks of Comparative method |
|
Definition
1) Limited ability to control 2) many variables, few cases 3) hard to generalize 4) measurement problems |
|
|
Term
Keohane, King, and Verba (KKV) Unified Logic |
|
Definition
Unified Logic of Inference: you collect data points in order to draw generalized conclusions -We see this in both qualitative and quantitative research |
|
|
Term
KKV 4 Characteristics of Scientific Research |
|
Definition
1) The goal is inference: to go beyond the particular observations collected 2) the procedures are public: use of explicit public methods to generalize and analyze data 3) The conclusions are uncertain: inference is imperfect 4) The content is the method: methods can be used to study virtually anything |
|
|
Term
Rationalist Paradigm (1) definition, (2) strengths, (2) weaknesses |
|
Definition
1) based upon the maximization of interests Strengths 1) clarity of mathematical reasoning 2)) good for looking at static not dynamic level Weakness 1) anemic view of interests 2) lack of realism |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) preferred causal explanation is culture 2) Culuture is defined roughly as a society's ways of life, systems of meaning and values Strength 1) Provide nuanced and detailed descriptions of particular cases Weaknesses 1) leads to non-generalizable theories 2) problems with defining culture 3) mechanisms are hard to specify |
|
|
Term
Structuralist/Institutional Paradigm |
|
Definition
1) draw together long-standing interests in political and social institutions in order to produce interpretive understanding Weaknesses 1) role of human intention is not factored in 2) too static (How do you explain institutional change |
|
|
Term
How the paradigm differ in ontology |
|
Definition
1) Rationalists study how actors employ reason 2) culturalists study rules 3) Structuralists explore relations |
|
|
Term
Schmitter and Karl Two defining features of democracy |
|
Definition
1) contingent consent: elected officials and citizens submit to the rules of democracy 2) unbounded certainty: outcomes of future elections are unclear until they actually occur |
|
|