Term
Why did Baddeley conclude there are 2 stores in working memory? |
|
Definition
Because people can do two working memory tasks simultaneously without much interference if one is acoustic and the other is visual |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
stores a limited number of sounds for a short period of time (left hemisphere) |
|
|
Term
functions of phonological loop |
|
Definition
storage of acoustic information, rehearsal of information |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
stores visual and spatial info (right hemisphere) |
|
|
Term
functions of visuo-spatial sketchpad |
|
Definition
gathers images from perception, visual info derived from verbal description, locating objects in space |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
combines info from phonological loop, visual-spatial sketchpad, and episodic buffer (frontal lobes) |
|
|
Term
functions of central executive |
|
Definition
plays a big role in attention: planning strategies and coordination behavior, suppresses irrelevant behaviors: what to do/not to do next |
|
|
Term
which part of working memory has to do with stimulus-independent thoughts (daydreaming)? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
what evidence is there that the central executive has to do with the stimulus independent thoughts? |
|
Definition
teasdale's research: subjects were told to make #s from lists of #s 1-10, task got difficult after 5 mins and they started to daydream |
|
|
Term
Rey-osterreith complex figure test |
|
Definition
tests for frontal lobe damage |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
temporary storage place for gathering and combining info from phono loop, visuo sketchpad, and LTM |
|
|
Term
H.M. why was brain surgery performed on him? |
|
Definition
he suffered from seizures and so he had surgery to remove them |
|
|
Term
was H.M.'s surgery successful? |
|
Definition
it was successful in that it stopped the seizures |
|
|
Term
what parts of H.M.'s brain was removed? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
how was his memory affected? |
|
Definition
he could no longer put things into his LTM so he could never learn new things |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
its the process of putting new items into LTM makes memories stronger |
|
|
Term
what does H.M.'s case suggest about memory? |
|
Definition
his case suggest that LTM and STM are different and different types of memory are involved with different parts of the brain |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
memories of events that happened to a person |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
knowledge about how to do something |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
organized knowledge about the world |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
getting info into storage |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
getting info out of storage |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
shallow quality of a word-visual appearance of the word, sound of a word deep quality - meaning of the word |
|
|
Term
classic test for depth perception |
|
Definition
-ask a yes/no question about a word (forces deep/shallow processing) -flash a word on the screen -later test for recall without knowing they would be tested |
|
|
Term
what were the results of the classic test for depth perception? |
|
Definition
they remembered fill-in-the-blank better than physical characteristics which meant meaning was deep |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a stimulus is different than other memory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
processing new info by associating it with other concepts in permanent memory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
repeating a stimulus. less likely to be permanently stored |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
mnemonic devices. better stored |
|
|
Term
depth of processing tested with pictures of faces |
|
Definition
subjects were shown faces of people they didnt know and asked about the width of the nose and the honesty of a person. later they correctly remembered honesty faces better |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
enhancement of LTM by relating the material to personal experiences |
|
|
Term
why does self-referential effect occur |
|
Definition
1. self has rich cues: allows for elaboration and distinctiveness 2. instructions encourage people to see how their traits are related to one another. we rehearse more if related to us |
|
|
Term
encoding specificity principle |
|
Definition
recall is better if the retrieval context is similar to encoding context ex. you should study where you take the test |
|
|
Term
in order for context to have an effect |
|
Definition
(1) type of task matters (recognition vs. recall) (2) other learning cues should be weak (3) bigger effect on older memories |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
tend to recall happy times when happy and bad times when sad |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
pleasant times are processed more efficiently than less pleasant times |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
recall material more accurately if its congruent with your current mood |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
memory of facts and experiences that can be continuously known |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
participants are specifically instructed to retrieve info they had previously learned |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
retention without conscious recollection ex. riding a bike |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
previous experiences aid in the performance of a task without conscious awareness of these previous experiences |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
recent exposure to a word increases likelihood you'll think of this particular word when given a cue that could evoke many different words |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
lack of memory related to events that occurred before a traumatic event |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
lack of memory related to event that occurred after a traumatic event |
|
|
Term
what part of memory is most affected by antegrade amnesia? |
|
Definition
explicit memory not implicit |
|
|
Term
childhood (infantile) amnesia |
|
Definition
a person's inability to recall events from early childhood |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
memory for events and topics related to oneself |
|
|
Term
factors to autobiographical memory |
|
Definition
-accurate for major details, not so for incidental details -memories can be constructed at time of retrieval -most recent experiences are recalled -older people tend to recall their adolescence and early adulthood -transitional firsts are recalled -people keep a running story of themselves |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
memory of a situation in which you first learned a very surprising or emotionally arousing event |
|
|
Term
6 incidental details recalled in flashbulb memory |
|
Definition
-place you first heard the news -the ongoing event interrupted -the person who gave you the news -your feelings -the feelings of others -aftermath |
|
|
Term
2 views of flashbulb memory |
|
Definition
1. they are different from other memories: remember stuff not remembered in other memories 2. they are like other memories: surprising and emotional memories are likely to be repeated and elaborated on: strengths memory |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
we tend to exaggerate the consistency between our past and present feelings and beliefs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
trying to identify the origin of our memory and beliefs |
|
|
Term
how valid is eyewitness testimony |
|
Definition
major details are fairly accurate, smaller details are often mistaken |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
event is viewed, afterward people are given misleading info about event, later recall the misleading info instead of what they saw |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
trouble recalling old material because recently new material interferes |
|
|
Term
loftus' stop/yield what did it demonstrate? |
|
Definition
time increases misinfo effect |
|
|
Term
4 factors to influence eyewitness testimoney? |
|
Definition
distraction=more errors if misleading info is believable social pressure if witness is given positive feedback for info |
|
|
Term
contructivist approach to memory |
|
Definition
we construct knowledge by integrating what we know so that our understanding of the event or a topic is coherent and makes sense |
|
|
Term
evidence that supports the recovered memory perspective |
|
Definition
hospital records who kids were treated for sexual assault as children but they don’t recall being assaulted when they’re adults. then after therapy or being told they were assaulted they remember. |
|
|
Term
bug bunny at disney world demonstrated |
|
Definition
They were shown a fake print advertisement that described a visit to Disneyland and how they met and shook hands with Bugs Bunny. Later 16% of these subjects said that they remembered meeting and shaking hands with Bugs Bunny. Demonstrated that eye witness testimony and false memories make for implausible facts |
|
|
Term
lost in the mall? what did it demonstrate? |
|
Definition
4 sotries: 3 real one fake (lost in mall as a child) demonstrated that recovered memories can be false memories |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
our background knowledge that helps us get along in life semantic knowledge and schemas |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
organized knowledge of the world includes matters of fact and conceptual knowledge |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
class of objects that belong together |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the mental representation of a category |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
decides what objects go in which categories |
|
|
Term
feature comparison modeal |
|
Definition
concepts are stored in memory according to a list of features, people decide whether or not the two match |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
attributes necessary to the memory of an item |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
attributes that are descriptive but not essential |
|
|
Term
2 stages of feature comparison |
|
Definition
-compare all features (defining/characteristic) -compare the features of the object to the category |
|
|
Term
sentence verification technique |
|
Definition
subjects read simple sentences and must consult their semantic knowledge to determine if the sentence is true or false |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
people reach decisions faster with an item is a typical member of a category |
|
|
Term
problems with feature comparison |
|
Definition
few concepts in real life have necessary features (3 legged dead dog that doesnt bark) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a person decides whether an item belongs in a category by comparing the item to a prototype |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the idealized item that is most typical of a category |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
degree to which members f a category are prototypical |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
no single attribute is shared by all examples of a concept even though each example has at least one attribute in common with other examples of a concept |
|
|
Term
prototype approach demonstrated with the identikit-face study |
|
Definition
-subjects were shown composite faces -each shared features with a prototype never shown -later given a recog test and asked how confident they were -subjects did well except they all identified the prototype face as seen before with the most confidence |
|
|
Term
advantages to the prototype approach |
|
Definition
-avoids defining categories by essential features -accounts for developing categories from loosely structured resemblances -shows how we can store a vast amount of info into a single prototype |
|
|
Term
problems with the prototype approach |
|
Definition
-sometimes a prototype is not the most typical item in a category -we often do store a vast amount of info -categories are treated as fuzzy by the prototype approach, but categories aren't fuzzy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
people first learn some specific examples f a concept and then classify a new stimulus by deciding how closely it resembles those specific examples |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
specific examples of a concept stored in memory |
|
|
Term
advantages to exemplar approach |
|
Definition
-avoids problems of necessary features -don't have to devise a prototype -can explain why we can categorize unusual examples (why a penguin is a bird) |
|
|
Term
problems with exemplar approach |
|
Definition
-explaining why we store some examples but not others (bat is not a bird) -exemplars for large categories can be awkward |
|
|
Term
prototypes are in what hemisphere of the brain |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
exemplars are in what hemisphere of the brain? |
|
Definition
|
|