Term
|
Definition
"The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." While some specific powers are expressly stated in Article I (i.e., the power as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces), the term "Executive Power" is not defined in the Constitution; one must look to case law decisions of the Supreme Court to give meaning and content to this term. Case law states that a variety of powers which historically have been integral to the function of governing a nation-state are "inherent" in the Office of the President, even though these powers are not expressly set forth in the Constitution. The power to enter into contracts is one of these powers. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Often referred to as the law-making branch. This body, divided into several offices, exercises certain powers that are provided by the Constitution. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The third branch of the Government. The Constitution provides for the establishment of the Supreme Court and lower courts. The judiciary’s role as final interpreter of the law and the Constitution is established by the Chief Justice Marshall’s landmark decision in the case of Marbury v. Madison. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Acts of Congress are codified under general topics in the United States Code (U.S.C.). For example, those laws relating specifically to the armed forces are found in Title 10 of the Code; Title 18 focuses on Federal crimes; and some key statutes relating to public contracts are found in Title 41. References to the Code are by title and section number, e.g., 10 U.S.C. § 2304(a). Some Acts are not codified and are referred to only by their public law number and the number of the Congress which enacted them; e.g., Public Law 83-324 was enacted by the 83rd Congress in 1953 (its first session) or in 1954 (its second session); Public Law 84-324 would be enacted by the 84th Congress in 1955 or 1956; and so on. These uncodified Acts are generally appropriation acts, legislation too recent to have been published in the Code, or temporary laws. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Administrative directives are issued by the President, frequently implementing authority granted by Congress. These orders are referred to by numbers and dates; e.g., Executive Order No. 9859, May 21, 1947. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The force and effect of Law. Published in bound form in once of several reporting series. Components of standard federal case citiation are the parties, volume, publication, start page, court, and year. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The watchdog charged with making certain appropriated funds are spent in accordance with the law. |
|
|
Term
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals |
|
Definition
Decide Contract Disputes. Single Board consisting of law judges, established by charter within the DoD. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Law made by judges on a case by case basis in absence of statute dictating a particular result in the case. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a practice known as Let the decision Stand |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The Government has Sovereign Immunity under common law but can be waived by statute. Government may specify and limit the conditions under which a waiver of immunity will be effective. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Until 1855 Government contractors in America were unable to sue the Government for matters such as non payment. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1946 Congress expaned waiver of sovereign immunity allowing law suits agains Goverment concering may types of non-contractual injuries. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A lawsuite brought by one party against another party to recover compensation or enforce private right. The party bringing the action (plaintiff) has the burden of establishing its right to recover by a preponderance of evidence. Breach of contract is an example. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Prosecution initiated by a government body against some person for having committed some act made illegal by a law, against the public. Primary purpose is to punish accused, not compensate the victim. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A promise or set of promises which, if breached, the law will remedy; the law will recognize a duty to carry out the promise.
Spells out the duties and responsibilities of each party to the contract. If a party fails to perform, the law will step in and provide to the party that is harmed a remedy. The definition of a contract recognizes the duty of both parties and thus, the court will fashion an appropriate remedy for the failure. Contracts may consist of a single promise by one person to another or it may involve any number of persons and any number of promises. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a broader term since it encompasses both those promises that the law will enforce and those that the law will not enforce. (It is noteworthy that the FAR governs contracts but does not apply to agreements such as Cooperative Research Agreements and various Federal grants.) This difference illustrates the point that a contract is strictly a legal concept and that the kinds of promises that are enforceable through the legal system are those that the system deems of sufficient social or economic importance to warrant enforcement. |
|
|
Term
Element of Contract Formation |
|
Definition
Capacity to contract
Mutual Assent to be bound
Give consideration
Have a lawful purpose
Terms of the contract must be reasonably certain and clear
Form permitted by law |
|
|
Term
Statute of Frauds Requirements for Written Contracts |
|
Definition
- Promises by an executor or administrator to answer damages to the estate out of his own assets;
- Promises to answer for the debt of another;
- Promises made upon the consideration of marriage;
- Contracts for the sale of lands or any interest in land; and,
- Contracts not to be performed within one year of their making.
- For the Sale of Goods > $500.00
|
|
|
Term
Obligation of Government Funds |
|
Definition
Be supported by documentary evidence of a binding agreement that is in writting (31 U.S.C.&1501)
Oral orders under small purchase threshold may be placed with Federal Supply Schedule contractors and the writing requirement is satisfied by teh contractor's use of a delivery ticket. |
|
|
Term
2 types of Implied Contracts |
|
Definition
implied in fact and implied in law |
|
|
Term
Express Contract and Implied in Fact |
|
Definition
Mutual agreement between parties.
Express, intention is evidenced by use of oral or writen words or signs or symbols with specified meanings
Implied in Fact contract parties evidence concent by conduct rather than words or symbols. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Implied in Law Contracts
Not actual contract, exists where one party has recieved or used something for which it is proper that they shoudl compensate the other. One person is benefited by another.
Generally speaking, there are two important areas in which quasi-contract cases arise. The first involves emergency situations. Where one performs services for another in an emergency, there is a presumption that the services are performed gratuitously. An exception is made when the performer of the services goes to great trouble or expense in performing the service, and this is allowed to override the presumption of gratuity. Another exception is made where the one performing the service is a professional in that particular line of work. In that instance, a presumption arises that the professional is not performing gratuitously, but rather is pursuing his or her profession. The second area in which quasi-contract cases arise is where one has a duty to do something and someone else voluntarily acts for them so that the duty is discharged or satisfied. The one who had the duty is unjustly enriched and can be required to compensate the acting party in quasi-contract. However, in general, the courts lack jurisdiction to hear a claim against the Government under the quasi-contract doctrine. |
|
|
Term
Constitution Section 8 Clause 18 |
|
Definition
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
This supplies the consititional power for the Government to enter into contract |
|
|
Term
Principle Agent Relationship |
|
Definition
US Government can only act through agents.
Agent defined as one who represents another person, called a principal in contractual matters. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The relationship created by the association of a principal and agent.
Arises when the principal authorizes the agent to act as his represenative with respect to another person and the agent concents to do so. (a "third party") |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Created by explicit language either in writing or orally.
Agency created orally is generally as binding as agency created by writing, however sometimes more difficult to prove. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Incidental authority.
Agent expressly assigned a task but the minor details are not spelled out.
Defined as "usual customary and necessary" |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Not Real or Acutal Authority
Invoked by the courts on equitable grounds.
Doctrine of apparent authority NEVER operates against the United States. But does operate against the contractor.
Somtimes called Agency by Estopple because it is based on the principals representation to the third party that the agent has authority. |
|
|
Term
Equitable Estoppel
Two Necessary Conditions |
|
Definition
1) The Government is acting in its proprietary rather than sovereign capacity
2) The agent of the Government is acting within the scope of his authority.
When these two conditions exist the Gov. may be estopped from denying the binding nature of its agents actuion when the four elements of equitable estoppel are present: 1) the Gov. knew the "true" facts
2) the Gov intended the contractor to rely on its actions
3) the contracto was ignorant of the facts
4) the contractor relied to its detriment. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An agreement made by an agent of the Government, which is not binding because the agent lacked the authority to act, may become binding on the Government upon ratifcation by a superior agent who had the power to grand the authority at the time othe agreement was made. The head of the Contracting Activity usually has this authority.
The Government is bound only by the actions of its agents who have actual authority, not apparent authority. |
|
|
Term
Express Delegation FAR Part 42 |
|
Definition
specifies the extent of CAO authority and how certain contracting authority may be withheld from the CAO (or expanded). There is, however, little regulatory guidance concerning how day-to-day contracting officer authority may be delegated. Judicial and administrative decisions recognize that authority may be delegated not only in writing, but also orally and by implication, i.e., the conduct of Government officials in authority amounts to an assignment of certain authority. Authority issues frequently concern whether the CO has impliedly delegated his authority, not whether the authority in question is express or implied |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Implied delegations of authority have included situations where the contract provided that inspection and acceptance was to be performed at a contractor's plant "by an authorized inspector of the government" and by an "authorized government representative.” For example, the Quality Assurance Representative assigned by the cognizant DCAS Office had the requisite authority to bind the CO |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The Federal Government is subject to lawsuits from private parties only if (1)Congress expressly waives sovereign immunity or (2) it operates in a proprietary (non-governmental) capacity. Historically this doctrine derives from medieval English common law, which held that the King, who ruled by "divine right" could do no wrong. A practical reason for the doctrine is that a sovereign acting in accordance with its delegated responsibilities must not be harassed by private suits to such an extent that its function is impaired. In a modern context, the government as a whole enjoys similar protection. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The Government is only bound by the acts of its agents committed within the scope of their agent's authority. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Government contract law differs from commercial contract law in the application of estoppel, an equitable doctrine which aims to prevent unfair or inequitable outcomes. It prevents a party who has misled someone through words and actions, from denying responsibility for those representations. For example, a government contracting officer may have the legal right to terminate a contractor for default if the contractor does not deliver on time. But if the contracting officer encourages continued performance after the delivery date has passed, and the contractor expends additional time and expense attempting to complete the contract, the contracting officer may lose the right to terminate. Here, the government’s actions encourage continued performance and impliedly suggest the contractor will be given additional time to complete. The courts might determine that the government has impliedly promised the contractor additional time and therefore estop the government from enforcing the termination for default clause. In contrast, the Government will not be bound by estoppel if the promise is one that the government agent has no authority to make. |
|
|
Term
Contracting Officers Role |
|
Definition
the role of the Government’s Contracting Officer in the award and administration of the contract. The Contracting Officer’s responsibilities extend beyond merely representing and protecting the interests of the Federal Government; the Contracting Officer also must “Ensure that contractors receive impartial, fair, and equitable treatment.” FAR 1-602-2(b). |
|
|
Term
The President desires to use federal resources to constuct a new national baseball museum in DC on land currently owned by a private party who is willing to sell at a fair market value. |
|
Definition
The president may construct the museum if Congress has appropriated funds for this purpose. |
|
|
Term
The principle of Sovereign Immunity states that: |
|
Definition
The government may not be sued or otherwise be subject to legal process unless it expressly agrees to submit to the authority of the courts. |
|
|
Term
At noon April 1 alan verbally offered to sell his train set to Bill for $200. Bill said he was interested but needed a few days to think about it. Alan responded sure, go ahead and think about it. An hour later Bill came to Alans house and declared I accept your offer. Alan explained that he had sold the set to someone else. Bill sues for breach of contract. What is the best assement of Bills chances to win his lawsuit? |
|
Definition
Bill will win if he can establish that Alan's offer was still valid when accepted at 1 pm on April 1st.
Bill will win because Alan never rescinded his offer. Even though Alan no longer owns the train set, Bill can sue for damages, in example cost he incurred to buy identical train set, to the extent that cost exceeds $200 |
|
|
Term
Wooly entered into bilateral contract with Coastal Fruits for 20,000 lbs of oranges with price to be determined later. Delivery was set, in writing, for 21 days after executino of the contract. When the delivery trucks arrived three weeks later, Woolly did not accept delivery and refused to pay. Coastal suide alleging breach of contract. Wooly asserted that failure to agree on a price prevented formation of a contract therefore no breach of contract could have occured. Who won the lawsuit? |
|
Definition
Coastal won because as long as the parties intended it to be a contract and other essential elements are present, the court will determine a reasonable price.
Under the UCC the court may determine a reasonable price if the product is commercial in nater and there is a market price that can be used to set a reasonable price. |
|
|
Term
AFB Staff Judge Advocate instructed packers to wrap law books in brown paper. It was not included in the contract. The packers did it. After moving the packers submitted a request for equitable adjustemnt for its additional costs of wrapping the books. What is most important in determining whither the packers are entitled to an equiatable adjustment of the contract price? |
|
Definition
Whether the contracting officer was aware of the staff judge advocates directive but said nothing to contradict it.
The government is only bound by actual authority, but that authority may be impliedly delegated to another gov official OR there can be an imp[lied ratification of an otherwise unauthorized order. If the Contracting Officer knew of the SJA's extra work directive and allowed the work to be performed, the CO may have impliedly ratified the extra work. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Identified how the legal process works and how it impacts contract formation and administration;
- The Legislative branch makes the laws and authorizes the expenditure of funds necessary to run the Government.
- The Executive branch implements the laws and carries out the day-to-day operations of the Government.
- The Judicial branch interprets the Constitution and the laws.
Identified the major sources of procurement law;
- Statutes passed by Congress;
- Executive Orders issued by the President;
- Judicial decisions rendered by the Federal Court system;
- Administrative decisions issued by bodies such as Boards of Contract Appeals and the Comptroller General;
- State laws do not apply to Federal contracts; and
- Regulations provide specific guidance on how the law or program is to be implemented.Identified the definition and the elements that must be present for a contract to be legally binding;
- A contract is a promise that the law will recognize and remedy if broken;
- Both parties must have the capacity to understand and appreciate the terms of the contract.
- Parties “mutually assent” to a contract when an offer is accepted under circumstances that objectively demonstrate a meeting of the minds.;
- Consideration is the name given to that "value" given by each party;
- The law will not recognize a contract that is for something that one cannot lawfully do;
- To be enforceable the contract terms must be sufficiently clear; and
- In the form permitted by law, written, oral, and implied through the conduct of the parties
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Compared the types of authority used in public and private contracting;
- Sovereignty which provides immunity to the Federal Government from lawsuits;
- Promissory estoppel prevents a party who has misled someone through words and actions, from denying responsibility for those representations.;
- Statutes and regulations greatly limit the latitude the Contracting Officer and the prospective contractor may exercise in negotiating a legally binding agreement;
- Implied-in-law-contracts are not legally binding on the Government since there is no evidence of consent on the part of the Government, even if it has actually derived a benefit;
- Limited authority is used Federal Government contracts, i.e., the Contracting Officer’s Warrant which specifies the limits of authority granted;
- Apparent authority is not recognized in Federal Government contracting; and
- The Government Contracting Officer’s responsibilities extend beyond merely representing and protecting the interests of the Federal Government; the Contracting Officer also must ensure that contractors receive impartial, fair, and equitable treatment.
|
|
|