Term
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) |
|
Definition
slaves were not protected by the consititution. |
|
|
Term
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) |
|
Definition
seperate but equal constitutional |
|
|
Term
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) |
|
Definition
seperate but equal unconstitutional |
|
|
Term
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (1971) |
|
Definition
busing kids to schools to achieve racial diveristy irregarless of geography ok because it ensures everyone would have equal educational oppurtunities |
|
|
Term
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle (2007) |
|
Definition
race cannot be used in specific schools solely to create racial diversity not a compelling state interest. followup to swann |
|
|
Term
Hernandez v. Texas (1954) |
|
Definition
equal protection extends to racial groups (here it concerned jury selection) |
|
|
Term
Korematsu v. United States (1944) |
|
Definition
Japanese interment ok (gov meet strict scrutiny standard) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
laws based on gender deserve intermediate scrutiny |
|
|
Term
Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) |
|
Definition
sodomy laws constitutional |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
states cannot ban sodomy due to the due process clause
overturns Bowers v. Hardwick |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
anti-antidiscrimination laws are unconstituional (this case involed colorado amendment to stop any special status used for homosexuals) |
|
|
Term
University of California v. Bakke (1978) |
|
Definition
racial quotas are unconstitutional however race can be taken into consideration in admission decisions for the benifits of diversity in the classroom |
|
|
Term
Adarand Constructors v. Pena (1995) |
|
Definition
racial rules by the federal government are subject to strict scrutiny (the case here involved favoring minorities for construction projects) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
upheld Powell's concurring opinion in Bakke in that narrowly tailored affirmative action rules for obtaining educational benifits of diversity was ok
law school |
|
|
Term
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) |
|
Definition
admissions plans with a point system for minorities (affirmative action) was unconsitutional as it was too mechanistic
undergraduate |
|
|