Term
Finding and construction selection measures |
|
Definition
Two options:
1) Locate an existing selection device (buy it), or
2) Construct your own selection device (make it)
- Both options start with job analysis to determine the KSAs that:
- are needed to perform the job’s essential functions,
- are needed on Day 1,
- the organization is not going to provide training on
|
|
|
Term
Choosing an Existing Selection Measure |
|
Definition
Need to clearly and completely understand the attribute or construct you want to measure Read reviews and evaluations of the assessment that claims to measure the construct Order a sample test and study any information relative to its reliability, validity, fairness, intended purpose, method of administration, time limits, scoring, appropriateness for specific groups, norm data, cost Is it appropriate for my organization’s needs?
|
|
|
Term
Advantages of Existing Selection Measures |
|
Definition
Usually less expensive and time-consuming
Reliability, validity, and other data available
May be superior to what could be developed in house.
Typically the skills needed to develop an assessment are not available in house.
|
|
|
Term
Steps in Constructing a New Selection Measure
|
|
Definition
1) Analyze job for which a measure is being developed
Specifies the KSAs needed
Determines what constructs need to be assessed
2) Select the method of measurement
3) Developing specifications
4) Pilot test, analyze, and revise the measure
5) Conduct reliability and validity study on revised measure
6) If all good, implement the measure in the selection process
|
|
|
Term
2) Method of Measurement to be Used |
|
Definition
Example methods – paper-and-pencil tests, work sample tests, interviews, etc.
- Issues that need to be considered:
- Skill of the individuals scoring/administering the test
- Number of applicants
- Skill level of applicants (e.g., reading level)
- Costs of testing and budget for selection
- If large number of applicants – paper and pencil test
- If social skills are critical – behavioral exercise
Example checklist for matching the job requirements with the method of measurement for industrial electricians
|
|
|
Term
3) Developing Specifications for the Selection Measure |
|
Definition
Specifications to consider:
- Purposes and uses of the measure
- Nature of the population
- How behaviors or knowledge, skills, abilities, and other attributes (KSAOs) will be gathered and scored
- e.g., should items be multiple choice or open ended?
- Sampling designs and statistical procedures to be used in selecting and editing items, determining number of items, etc.
- How many total items? Items per KSA to be measured?
|
|
|
Term
4. Pilot test, analyze, revise
|
|
Definition
preferably at least 100-200 participants
Item analyses (e.g., % correct; by group)
Item fairness/differences among subgroups
Fix problems
|
|
|
Term
5. Reliability and validity study on revised measure
|
|
Definition
Are scores dependable for making decisions?
Are the test scores predictive of job success?
|
|
|
Term
6. Implement test in selection process
|
|
Definition
Collect norm data as you go
Start to finish the process on average takes about 3-5 years
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
interpreting scores on selection measures
You got a 69 on a selection test. Is that a good score? How do you interpret that score?
- What if top score was 73? What if everyone else got 73?
- Until you know how everyone else did, an individual score is hard to interpret
Norms show how well an individual performs with respect to a specified comparison group
- Need to use a relevant norm group
- Use local norms rather than national norm data (if available)
- Norms are transitory – they may change over time
Percentiles and standard scores are frequently used to interpret test scores with respect to norms
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Shows percentage of persons in a norm group who fall below a given score
The higher the percentile score, the better a person’s performance relative to others in the normative sample
Percentiles specify how far a data point is from the bottom, not the top
|
|
|
Term
Misuses of Percentile Scores
|
|
Definition
Are not percentage (raw) scores (69th percentile not same as 69% score (69 out of 100)
- Percentile scores are based on an ordinal scale of measurement, not a ratio scale
- Can only do greater than/less than comparisons
- Score at 60th percentile is not 2x better than score at 30th
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Indicate, in common measurement units, how far above or below the mean score any raw score is
These scores represent adjustments to raw scores so that is it possible to determine the proportion of individuals who fall at various standard score levels
|
|
|
Term
Most common standard score is a z score
|
|
Definition
Z-scores measure how outstanding an individual is relative to the mean of a population using the standard deviation for that population to define the scale.
Note that percentiles use the median as the average (50th percentile), while z-scores use the mean as average (z-score of 0).
|
|
|
Term
The formula for computing z scores is |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Z-scores allow us to compare scores from different populations
Comparing ACT and SAT scores; assume…
SAT tests: mean = 500, sd = 100
ACT tests: mean = 18, sd = 6
Compare SAT score of 680 and ACT score of 25
SAT z-score = 1.8 [(680-500)/100]
ACT z-score = 1.17 [(25-18)/6]
Which is a better score?
|
|
|