Term
|
Definition
More specialization => more coordination |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The degree to which jobs are guided by standardized rules & procedures. |
|
|
Term
Higher formalization means: |
|
Definition
More explicit job descriptions More clearly defined procedures Less discretion for workers Lower flexibility |
|
|
Term
High formalization is appropriate when: |
|
Definition
Jobs are relatively simple and routine (Charlie Chaplin) Consistency is important (e.g., safety, legal, equity)
Example: Department of motor vehicles, Red October (next slide) |
|
|
Term
Low formalization usually coupled with mutual adjustment |
|
Definition
Mutual adjustment – workers agree between themselves how to coordinate their work
Example: Jazz band, basketball, product development |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An organization s chain of command, that defines the relative authority each manager has. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The power to hold people accountable for their actions and to decide how to use of organizational resources. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The continuous line of authority from top to bottom of an organization |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a person should report to only one manager |
|
|
Term
Narrow span of control = taller structures |
|
Definition
Within department: High control and coordination by manager. Across the organization: “Silos” to the max |
|
|
Term
Wide span of control = flatter structures |
|
Definition
Within department: Less control and coordination by manager Relies on effective empowerment of workers Across the organization: Flat organization => quicker communications, decision-making and implementation Fewer managers => Lower overhead costs |
|
|
Term
The trend is strongly to flatter organizations |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The degree to which decisions are made at higher organizational levels |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The degree to which decisions are made at lower levels |
|
|
Term
Higher levels centralization: |
|
Definition
More experience, knowledge of organization and environment as a whole. |
|
|
Term
Lower levels centralization: |
|
Definition
Often have more current knowledge of specific features of the environment |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Coordination across departments horizontally |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Structural arrangements to increase coordination across horizontal boundaries. |
|
|
Term
Why is integration necessary? |
|
Definition
Hierarchy = limited capacity to coordinate across departments Integrating mechanisms augment hierarchy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Managers meet on an ad hoc basis as necessary to solve problems that cross departmental lines. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Coordinates two departments which have frequent contact, by having one manager/worker from each department assigned the responsibility for coordinating with the other. Not full-time. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
One manager/worker from each relevant department is assigned to a task force that meets to solve a specific, mutual problem. Members are responsible for representing their department and reporting back to their department. Not full-time. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
One or more managers or workers from each department are assigned to a specific task requiring intensive, sustained coordination. The team is an intact unit, with loyalty being to the problem and the team rather than the department. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• High specialization, rigid departmentalization, clear chain of command, narrow spans of control, centralization, high formalization • Rigid, controlled—Efficient |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• Cross-functional teams, free flow of info, integrating mechanisms, wide spans of control, decentralization, low formalization • Flexible, changing—Adaptive |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the formal framework by which job tasks are divided, grouped, and coordinated |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
dividing the work up, includes jobs and departmentalization |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
keeping everyone working in sync, includes horizontal and vertical mechanisms |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
how you separate large tasks into smaller components and then organize those tasks into jobs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
trend was to simplify jobs to increase mechanical efficiency |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
shows that initially people said that we need to be really efficient, and everyone has a really simple job |
|
|
Term
o ENLARGEMENT & ENRICHMENT |
|
Definition
Led to comprehensive assessments of job design on employee productivity, motivation, and satisfaction |
|
|
Term
o Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model—key outcomes (productivity, motivation, and satisfaction) depend on a job’s: |
|
Definition
Skill variety Task identity Task significance Autonomy Feedback These make jobs more intrinsically motivating |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
basis by which jobs are grouped together |
|
|
Term
o Functional Departmentalization |
|
Definition
groups similar JOBS together by functions performed |
|
|
Term
Pros of functional departmentalization |
|
Definition
• High specialization • strong coordination within functions • high efficiency (low duplication) |
|
|
Term
Cons of functional departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Inflexible (“one size fits all”) • poor coordination across departments • limited view of organizational goals |
|
|
Term
o Product Departmentalization |
|
Definition
group similar PRODUCTS or SERVICES together |
|
|
Term
Pros of product departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Specialize in product/service • More focus, expertise, responsiveness |
|
|
Term
Cons of product departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Duplication of functions • Poor coordination across departments • Limited view of organizational goals |
|
|
Term
o Customer Departmentalization |
|
Definition
group similar CUSTOMERS together |
|
|
Term
Pros customer departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Specialize around a customer • More focus, expertise, responsiveness |
|
|
Term
Cons customer departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Duplication of functions • Poor coordination across departments • Limited view of organizational goals |
|
|
Term
o Regional Departmentalization |
|
Definition
group similar PLACES together |
|
|
Term
Pros of regional departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Specialize in region • More focus, expertise, responsiveness • Lower travel/transport costs • Local presence |
|
|
Term
cons of regional departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Duplication of functions • Poor coordination across departments • Limited view of organizational goals |
|
|
Term
Pros to Alternatives to functional departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Focus, expertise, responsiveness—each specializes around a specific source of complexity in the environment (products, customers, places) |
|
|
Term
Cons to Alternatives to functional departmentalization |
|
Definition
• Resource duplication • Lower functional specialization • People tend to identify with departmental rather than organizational goals |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Groups similar jobs together into a series of departments, each headed by a manager Can be expanded to multiple organizational levels |
|
|
Term
Advantages of functional structure |
|
Definition
pecialization, efficiency and size • High specialization • Little duplication of resources • Can achieve huge economies of scale in production • Huge organizations become possible with multiple levels |
|
|
Term
Functional structure Problems in large organizations”Silos” |
|
Definition
• As functional organizations grow, the # of organizational levels increase • Silos—closed structure, open on inside o Each function is a silo, have trouble moving horizontally but not up and down • Silo effect o Slow communication and decisions, action is up and down the hierarchy, not across o Preoccupation with departmental rather than organizational goals |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• Sub is the organizational unit • Captain’s order is implemented quickly—goes down Silo because authority, high responsiveness • Ryan’s request o the captain travels across the silos—can have influence only, from weakness • Formalization • Structure determines organizational responsiveness—problem is not individual competence, structure defines what an organization can and cannot do |
|
|
Term
When functional structures lose effectiveness |
|
Definition
• Perform poorly in these situations because such structures tend to be “one-size-fits all” • Loyalties are ultimately based on function rather than to one specific product, country, or customer…departmentalization all over again |
|
|
Term
Organizational structure made up of separate, semiautonomous units called |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Advantages of Divisional Structure |
|
Definition
• Each division specializes on a specific product, region or customer, and so performs better—more focused, customized strategies, more responsive |
|
|
Term
Disadvantages of divisional structure |
|
Definition
• Resources are duplicated across divisions—separate manufacturing plants instead of large more efficient ones • Divisions find it tough to cooperate with other divisions—divisions and their leaders often compete with each other, incentives for cooperation are weak, whole idea to focus on your business |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
degree to which jobs are guided by standardized rules and procedures • Higher means: more explicit job descriptions, more clearly defined procedures, less discretion for workers, lower flexibility o Appropriate when jobs are relatively simple and routine, consistency is important • Lower—coupled with mutual adjustment—workers agree between themselves how to coordinate their work |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
o Helicopter pilot won’t use reserve fuel Pro—enhances safety, consistently return to base Con—limits flexibility Formalization—rules there for consistency but inflexible o Lightning during transfer Pro—formalization incorporates learning so a complex, dangerous job can be done quickly, consistently and safely o Can=high expertise, cannont=silos |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
up and down the organization |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
an organization’s chain of command, that defines the relative authority each manager has (high expertise) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
power to hold people accountable for their actions and to decide how to use organizational resources |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
continuous line of authority from top to bottom of an organization |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
a person should report to only one manager |
|
|
Term
Span of Control • Narrow=TALL structures |
|
Definition
o Within department—high control and coordination by manager o Across the organization—silos to the max o More expensive, more managers for less workers |
|
|
Term
span of control • Wide=FLAT structures (trend stronger) |
|
Definition
thin department—less control and coordination by manager; relies on effective empowerment of workers o Quicker decisions o Across organization—flat organization=quicker communications, decision-making, implementation o Fewer managers—lower overhead costs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the degree to which decisions are made at higher organizational levels |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
degree to which decisions are made at lower levels |
|
|
Term
• Which is best depends on what level is best placed to decide o Higher levels—more experience, knowledge of organization and environment as a whole o Lower levels—often have more current knowledge of specific features of environment |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• Structural arrangements to increase coordination across horizontal boundaries o A task force that coordinates a new product introduction • Horizontal counterpart to hierarchy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
coordination across departments o Necessary because hierarchy=limited capacity to coordinate across departments o Integrating mechanisms augment hierarchy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
managers meet on an ad hoc basis as necessary to solve problems that cross departmental lines |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
coordinates 2 depts which have frequent contact, by having one manager/worker from each dept assigned the responsibility for coordinating with the other |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
one manager/worker from each relevant dept is assigned to a task force that meets to solve a specific, mutual problem. Represent and report back |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
one or more managers or workers from each dept are assigned to a specific task requiring intensive, sustained coordination; loyalty to problem and team rather than dept |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
entire organization is made up of work teams that do the organization’s work |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
employees continuously work on projects • All work is performed by project teams o Employees work on a series of projects o Pro—flexible, adaptive to changing needs o Con—difficult to maintain consistency, gain efficiencies of scale Emphasizes mutual adjustment and professional expertise, rather than formalization Investments in knowledge management |
|
|
Term
o Boundaryless organizations |
|
Definition
an organization whose design is not defined by or limited to the horizontal, vertical, or external boundaries imposed y a predefined structure • Increase effectiveness (flexibility, efficiency, innovation) by reducing force of structural boundaries in organization o Remove vertical boundaries—through participative decision-making, wide spans of control, flatter orgs o Remove horizontal (silo) boundaries—through cross-functional teams, by organizing work around processes instead of functional departments o Remove external boundaries—form strategic alliances to break down barriers between the company and its customers and suppliers |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
organization that has developed the capacity to continuously learn, adapt, and change |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
what you see, hear, feel by hanging around, “I see…” |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
strategies, goals, philosophies (espoused justifications), to advocate/articulate, “Why do you…” |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs, perceptions, thoughts and feelings (ultimate sources of values and actions), really have to dig deep to analyze importance, “Why do you really…” |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Artifacts—uniforms, language Espoused values—hierarchy and procedures are obviously central here, “Code Red”, “outside the unit” Basic assumptions—why is going outside the unit such a problem? Must stick together |
|
|
Term
• Culture shapes managerial attitudes and behaviors o Culture filters perceptions (think selectivity)— |
|
Definition
what managers consider important, how they interpret it, what actions they take o Affects planning (degree of risk that plans should contain), structure (degree of autonomy given to employees), and leadership (what leadership style is appropriate |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
o CEO did not recognize a basic assumption of the culture—only informal interaction could an idea come to fruitation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
command and control” High formalization, dominance of rules and procedure, hierarchical coordination |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
in this together attitude Tradition, loyalty, personal commitment, extensive socialization, teamwork |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
High levels of risk taking, dynamism, and creativity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Achievement of measurable and demanding goals, especially those that are financial and/or market based, very contractual arrangement |
|
|
Term
• 7 dimensions of organizational culture |
|
Definition
o innovation and risk taking—degree to which employees are encouraged to be innovative and to take risks o attention to detail—degree to which employees are expected to exhibit precision, analysis, and attention to detail o outcome orientation—degree to which managers focus on results or outcomes rather than on how these outcomes are achieved o people orientation—degree to which management decisions take into account the effects on people in the organization o team orientation—degree to which work is organized around teams rather than individuals o aggressiveness—degree to which employees are aggressive and competitive rather than cooperative o stability—degree to which organizational decisions and actions emphasize maintaining the status quo |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
o Strong cultures—key components of culture are intensely held and widely shared, organizational commitment and higher performance Greater influence on employees, more committed employees, higher organizational performance if culture is externally oriented |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
focus on issues internal to the firm rather than what is going on outside the firm Success can lead managers to act arrogantly, complacently, politically, bureaucratically, to protect what they have Strong internally focused cultural drummer prevents managers from mobilizing collective responses to competitive changes |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
focused on several key constituencies and on the external environment Stockholders AND employees AND especially customers Key managers are willing to initiate change when the environment changes or constituent’s needs change A strong externally focused cultural drummer helps those managers mobilize collective, adaptive responses to change |
|
|
Term
• Drivers of Globalization |
|
Definition
o Free Trade Doctrine—everyone is better off if each country specializes in what it can produce most efficiently o Global trend to democracy and free-market policies o Barriers of distance and culture diminishing—improving transportation and communications technologies o Tariffs declining—national borders are increasingly irrelevant as barriers to trade |
|
|
Term
• Regional Trading Alliances |
|
Definition
agreements among groups of partner countries to facilitate inter-partner trade o Increase market size and reduce trade barriers o More beneficial to breaking down barriers than just national ones |
|
|
Term
• Implications of Globalization and Trade |
|
Definition
o Firms and managers must be able to compete globally o Declining trade barriers huge opportunities—larger markets and global sourcing huge challenges • intense competition (competing globally) • managing and operating in foreign countries (different laws and cultures) • global legal-political environments differ (stability) • global economic environments differ (inflation) • employment dislocation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
managers believe home country knows best, centralize, hold key decisions/technology close Linked to Parocialism—managers view the world solely through its own eyes and perspectives, do not recognize differences More naïve manager, just exporting things there and seen as outsiders |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
managers believe host-country managers know best, decentralize, let each country manage own unit Weaker center perhaps because there are multiple centers, more informed manager Try to be citizen in each country you are in |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
managers try to transcend barriers and use the best from around the globe, regardless of location |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
any type of international company that maintains operations in multiple countries |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
multinational that centralizes its management and other decisions in the home country, consistent with ethnocentric attitude • Advantages: simple structure, more tightly controlled, economy of scale and efficiency • Disadvantages: more ineffective management, inflexibility, social and political backlash |
|
|
Term
Multidomestic corporation |
|
Definition
multinational that decentralizes management and other decisions to the local country, consistent with polycentric attitude • Advantages: extensive knowledge of foreign market and workplace, more support from host gov, committed local managers with high moral • Disadvantages: duplication of work, reduced efficiency, difficult to maintain global objectives because of intense focus on local traditions |
|
|
Term
Borderless organization |
|
Definition
multinational that attempts to eliminate artificial geographic barriers, consistent with geocentric attitude • Advantages: forces understand of global issues, balanced local and global objectives, best people and work approaches used regardless of origin • Disadvantages: difficult to achieve, managers muct have both local and global knowedge |
|
|
Term
o “Managers Hot Seat” Video |
|
Definition
American manager is direct, but befuddled Problem—difference in national culture, individualistic vs. collectivistic • Relationship matters greatly to the Japanese manager In a collectivistic society • Your group is central and distinguished from other groups. • Others are not initially considered to be part of your group. • Establishing a relationship is crucial before doing business. • Roger’s transfer matters. Why did the American manager miss it: • In individualistic societies, the task often prevails over the relationship • Others are treated in universalistic fashion – no privileged groups • Roger’s transfer is a footnote Cultural Differences • different perceptions of what is important, appropriate, effectiveperceptions that other is acting inappropriately, ineffectively • incorrect, serlf-serving attributions regarding other’s motives |
|
|
Term
o Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural values |
|
Definition
Power distance—influence and control unequally distributed Uncertainty avoidance – Avoidance of ambiguity and risk, conformity to norms • High uncertainty=more risky Individualism – expectation that people take care of themselves / masters of own destiny. • Compared to Collectivism, expectation that others in the group will look after them and should be looked after. Quantity of Life (or Achievement) – assertiveness, acquisition of money, indifference to others • Compared with Quality of Life (or nurturing), valuing relationships and showing sensitivity and concern for the welfare of others. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
change in technology, a departure from previous ways of doing things |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
methods, processes, systems and skills used to transform resources into products |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
widely accepted standard for a particular product or process |
|
|
Term
o Technology leadership=first to market strategy |
|
Definition
Advantages • “first-mover”—little competition, high profit margins • occupy best niches and build entry barriers, can skim buyers who value your product most highly • learn ahead of the competition Disadvantages • early products often crude and or unreliable • market often develops slowly • technology develops quickly and so requires sustained investment |
|
|
Term
o Technology Followership=late to market |
|
Definition
Advantages • Less rick and uncertainty—about market and technology • Learn from leaders—imitate strengths, avoid weaknesses Disadvantages • Leaders occupy entrenched positions • Leaders are a moving target |
|
|
Term
o Pirates of Silicon Valley |
|
Definition
Xerox—leader, had something revolutionary, top management missed it Apple got it and Microsoft followed |
|
|
Term
o Inputs (creative individuals, groups, organizations)transformation (creative process, creative situation)outputs (creative products) |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Organic structures positively influence innovation Abundant resources Frequent communication between organizational units Innovative organizations try to minimize extreme time pressures on creative activities Employee’s creative performance is enhanced when org’s structure explicitly supports creativity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Organic structures positively influence innovation Abundant resources Frequent communication between organizational units Innovative organizations try to minimize extreme time pressures on creative activities Employee’s creative performance is enhanced when org’s structure explicitly supports creativity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Accept ambiguity Tolerate the impractical Low external controls Tolerate risk Tolerate conflict Focus on ends rather than means Use an open-system focus Provide positive feedback |
|
|
Term
o Human Resources Variables |
|
Definition
High commitment to training and development High job security Creative people |
|
|
Term
o Principles of New Product development |
|
Definition
Use of development funnel Establish cross-functional teams Use partly parallel development Involve customers and suppliers |
|
|
Term
Forming Natural Work Units |
|
Definition
Take sequence of events that makes unit of work and organize around that. What I am doing is feeding into something that will be useful |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
managers view the world solely through its own eyes and perspectives, do not recognize differences More naïve manager, just exporting things there and seen as outsiders |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
influence and control unequally distributed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
assertiveness, acquisition of money, indifference to others |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
valuing relationships and showing sensitivity and concern for the welfare of others |
|
|