Term
|
Definition
Only time public gets to speak authoritatively. Results matter, and it holds politicians accountable. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
VO Keys said that it is the opinion held by private parties which government finds it prudent to heed. Public refers to the adults who share in a common government. Opinion refers to verbal expressions of unobservable attitudes. |
|
|
Term
Choosing candidates: 19th century |
|
Definition
Chosen by party. People get together in backroom, decide people and they run. It was party-centric. |
|
|
Term
Choosing candidates: 20th century |
|
Definition
Turns to candidate centric. Five ways of getting chosen: Conventions: meeting of party elites, usually pretty small and active members. Caucus: open meetings of party members. Closed primary: only party members can vote. Open primary: anyone can vote for candidates in one party. Blanket primary: voters can vote in any party's contest for each office. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
low voter turnout can dramatically effect elections
People get more party focused, or lean more towards political spectrum in primary. Then need to go more moderate during elections. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Local and state officeholders. 3/4 from business, banking, law, others from education, journalism, public service. Amateurs in time of upheaval "actors, athletes and astronauts" Women do as well as men when women run |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
center around a candidate, narrative not issues, idealized campaign images. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Aggregate level: how many voted? # of votes cast/# of eligible voters. Individual level? did you vote? |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Importance of race, midterm versus presidential years. Importance of issues. Voter characteristics. |
|
|
Term
When people vote: political context |
|
Definition
Negative campaigning, possible turnoff. media, more coverage more voters. competitiveness: more votes if more competitive mobilization: bush in 2004, obama in 2008. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
party identification, incumbency.
Candidates: perception of personal characteristics. Issues: especially important in economy. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
incumbents easier to win, unless tied up in scandal, quality challenger, breaking from one's own district on important issue, redistricting. |
|
|
Term
Four characteristics of opinion: |
|
Definition
Direction: like or not like Intensity: really like or hate Stability: have you always thought this? Salience: how important is this to you? |
|
|
Term
straw poles vs scientific poles |
|
Definition
straw poles survey those in attendance. Scientific poles random sampling, sample size can be about 1500 which will have +-3% margin of error. |
|
|
Term
Polling Issues: Question wording |
|
Definition
double barreled questions, phrasing issues, priming, internal polls vs independent polls, answer format, question order: priming identities, sampling error (not using cell phones), |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
more influential political attitude, psychological infinity with a party, central to almost all political positions. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
many attitudes are unstable, same people, same questions, different answers. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Surveillance: monitor the political world Interpretation: why it is important Socialization: help the world realize a social aspect Manipulation: hoping to change something bad |
|
|
Term
What does the media cover: |
|
Definition
exceptional events, not ordinary ones. Subjective judgments: news is the product made by decision of journalists, editors, owners. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Political norms and sources: details are easy, issues are hard. Economic concerns: profit focus, eyeball delivery system, fear of losing audience. |
|
|
Term
Impact media has on people |
|
Definition
subtle effects, doesn't directly impact what people think. Agenda setting: increased coverage of something causes people to think about it.
priming: as coverage increases, so does the likelihood that people will use that issue when rating a leader's performance.
framing: how media defines the essential problem (episodic vs thematic) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Third parties rarely win. Electoral laws shape party development. Winner take all with electoral college. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Have one election, and then take the top two. |
|
|
Term
Alternative #2: Multiple Member Districts |
|
Definition
2 or more reps per district: each voter has as man votes as representatives allocate as he/she sees fit. Maybe a district is represented by two people. |
|
|
Term
Alternative #3: Proportional Representation |
|
Definition
each party's representation in legislature is proportional to its percentage of the total votes. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
vehicle for dissent within party. |
|
|
Term
Barriers: Major party strategies |
|
Definition
delegitimize candidate, co-opt issues: campaign governing. |
|
|
Term
When do third parties do well? |
|
Definition
appealing, charismatic candidates. disillusionment with both major parties barriers to new voters are low |
|
|
Term
In elections, rules matter |
|
Definition
institutional rules shape party system, different rules would mean different system, american politics is favored two parties third parties face steep uphill climbs |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
parties are logical development american system requires successive majorities to make change parties help organize conflict |
|
|
Term
What is an interest group? |
|
Definition
private organization trying to shape public policy, small scale, have focus and membership. |
|
|
Term
Types of interest groups: |
|
Definition
cooperations trade/business association professional association unions citizens/civil rights groups other |
|
|
Term
Public vs private interest groups |
|
Definition
Private: fraction of community or nation, seek policies for own benefit. Public: act in interest of public as a whole |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Inside, direct lobbying. Former insiders, out of public view, Personal ties. Congress: sympathetic, influential members, committees, staffers. Information, drafting, research.
The outside game: indirect lobbying, grassroots organizing. |
|
|
Term
Political action committees: |
|
Definition
organized for the purpose of raising and spending money to elect and defeat candidates. Limits on amount given: $5,000 to candidate per election, $15,000 to party, another $5,000 to another PAC. |
|
|
Term
What do interest groups want? |
|
Definition
votes, access, attention/activity/give rewards (thanks for past action, keep up good work) |
|
|
Term
Why do people join interest groups? |
|
Definition
selective incentives, pride/self-esteem, personal relationships, organizing entrepreneurs. |
|
|
Term
Who joins interest groups? |
|
Definition
more educated, more income, more skills. |
|
|
Term
Contrast to social movements |
|
Definition
drawing on disruptive power of people, bottom up theory change. about the mass public as much as elected officials. |
|
|