Term
Administrative Law Defined |
|
Definition
The governing the forms, functions, and activities of government agencies.
imposes procedural requriements or other obligations on all federal agencies unless they have a statutory exemption |
|
|
Term
Where are agencies established in the Constitution? |
|
Definition
Congress is given the authority to create agenices through:
the necessary and proper clause
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18
Presidential Power
Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 |
|
|
Term
Admin Agencies are governed by: |
|
Definition
organic acts created by congress
and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
If the organic act does not cover agency action, then the agency action is covered by the APA |
|
|
Term
APA Defined Administrative Agency
Section 551 |
|
Definition
An authority of the government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to reveiw by another agency
Does Not Include:
- Congress, the courts of the United States, the govt's of the territories or possessions of the United States, govt of DC, Agencies composed of representatives of the parties or of representatives of organizations of the parites to the disputes determined by them, court martials and military commissions, military authority exercised in the field in time of war or in occupied territory, sections conferred in different sections of the APA |
|
|
Term
Common Definition of Agency |
|
Definition
Any authority of the US govt, except Congress, the federal coruts, territorial govts and certain military entities |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Typically executive agencies (means that there is one person in charge of the entire agency)
falls under the executive with cabinet level agencies which gives the president unlimited removal power in his sole disrection |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Typically Independent Agencies -- run by boards or commissions, most regulate economic activity
insulated from presidential control
Removal -- insulated from presidential control that apply to normal executive agencies
- they have tenure in office and removal by misconduct or cause
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
APA Defined:
Prospective
Force of Law (binding law)
Has to be general
An agency statement
(Remember: Paul Freed Girl Scouts)
Types:
Formal and Informal |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Final disposition other than rulemaking
INCLUDES LICENSING
Particular and immediate
Results from adjudication:
proceedings can be formal and informal
order have no procedural requirements
if it is characterized as a rule then procedural requirements will apply |
|
|
Term
Determining if it is Rulemaking or Adjudication |
|
Definition
If it is a:
- generality (more likely to be a rule) and prospectively (imminent impact on parties)
- The more prospecitve, the more likely it is a rule
|
|
|
Term
Functionalist view of the Constitution |
|
Definition
TEXT PLUS
the text of the law is important, but so are other avenues |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
JUST TEXT
The laws text is written down and that is all that matters |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The principal of seperation of powers was not simply an abstract |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
3 branches of govt cannot delegate their constitutional power to others, but they still do.
The Delegation Continuum -- how much authority has been delgated to an administrative agency |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
There is no delegation to agencies |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Early SC cases only permitted CONDITIONAL LEGLISLATION
First Congress: any proper person Congress felt that they could make a fair amount of digression to the Prez that they felt was necessary
Second Congress: if Congress gave narrow digression then the court would uphold it |
|
|
Term
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States |
|
Definition
Conditional language is okay.
Gave the president one choice in an area where you cna mkae firm judgment and this was power that can be delegated |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The fact that the presidnet gets to make unreasonable trade restrictions does not give a large amount of power to him and therefore the court rejected the delegation challenge
Congress can enact legislation on the effect of which depends on the presidents determination that a named contigency exists |
|
|
Term
Intelligible Prinicpal Test
|
|
Definition
(developed in: J.W. Hampton v. U.S.)
If Congress shall lay down by legislative act an intelligible principal to which the person or body authorized to fix such rates is direct to conform, such legistalive action is not forbidden delgation of legislative power
an intelligible principal can be as broad as in public interest
only 2 cases have ever been overturned by the court of having too much delegation |
|
|
Term
Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan |
|
Definition
Because no standards were given limiting the power there was too much power delegated |
|
|
Term
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry v. United States |
|
Definition
giving the president the power to decide what was considered to be fair competition was considered to broad of an intelligible principal and was overturned |
|
|
Term
Mistretta v. United States |
|
Definition
For Congress to fulfill its legislative function effectively, it must be able to leave details to the agenices
If the question is whether Congress has given too much discretion, the court will rule no except:
1. wherer it involes the entire economy
2. unlimited discretion
3. rule of contruction
4. if the case is close to the line, the court will employ a rule of construction to limit the delegation |
|
|
Term
What does Non-Delegation Limit: |
|
Definition
Almost nothing:
schecter polutry
- cannot delegate the power of the entire economy
- there have been no limits on the President's discretion
- Rules of construction
If there is a delegation that plausibly could be read to be an unconstitutional delegation, it is mechanism that there are no successful non-delegation challenges. |
|
|
Term
How can Congress pull back on the power they delegate to Admin Agencies the the President? |
|
Definition
Legislative Veto
Statutory Overrides
Appropriations |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Used to be a way of control over the agencies
However, it has been overturned and can no longer be used because on many occassions it lack bicameralsim (they would allow a one house veto) and it lacked the president's signature (a requirement to make anyting law) |
|
|
Term
Immigration & Naturalization v. Chadha |
|
Definition
overturned the legislative veto |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
mechanism where one, or both, houses pass a resolution disagreeing with an agency action with presidential approval |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
congress controls the "purse strings" that are available to each agency and can use that control or reward agency behavior through reduced or expanded budget |
|
|
Term
2 methods for appoiting agency personnel |
|
Definition
President Nominates, Senate Confirms
- they are a officer of the united states if the senate has to confirm them
OR
Preisdent, Courts of Law or heads of deparement can appoint agency personnel
- they are an inferior officer if appointed this way
- do not need senate confirmation
|
|
|
Term
Are they an officer or an employee?
Test |
|
Definition
An officer: exercises significant legal authority
an employee: handles ministerial/functionary things |
|
|
Term
Congress Duties in Appointment |
|
Definition
Congress Cannot:
1. appoint administrative officials
2. have members of congress serve on adminstrative bodies
3. control the removal of agency officials
4. exercise their legislative veto over administartive action unless both houses and the president are involved |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
People can be appointed by the President, Courts or Heads of Department
congress CANNOT appoint, but they can amend the agency organic act to affect the powers of an already appointed official |
|
|
Term
Freytag v. Commission of Internal Revenue |
|
Definition
If ALJ's make formal, final decisions they are acting then more than employees and should be treated as inferior officers |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
If ALJ's who do not make final agency decisions are govt employees, not inferior officers and do not need to be appointed. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Independent counsel was considered an inferior officer because they are appointed by judges and because they investigate the president there might be a conflict of interest between the parties |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Court does not dispute that military appellate judges are charged with exercising significant authority on behalf of the united states |
|
|
Term
Removal of Agency Officials |
|
Definition
Congress can limit Presidential Removal Power so long as it does not "unduly interfere' with the president's constitutionally appointed duties (does not matter if it is purely executive) -- Morrison v. Olson |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
President has the sole authority to remove executive officials because 1. executive power in the constitution means ultimate removal power 2. appointment clause does not implicate anything about removal 3. if congress could limit who could be removed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Congress cannot delegate too much power to agencies regarding adjudication because they they are overstepping their bounds of Article III |
|
|
Term
Rule of Delegation Prior to Schor |
|
Definition
Administrative agency can delegate a public right (i.e. govt suits) Administrative agencies cannot adjudicate private rights |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Considered to be common law rights -- torts, contracts, and property |
|
|
Term
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor Test for Delegation to AJ's |
|
Definition
To authorize the adjudication of article III business in a non-article III tribunal impermissible threatens the institutional integrity of the Judicial Branch
Factors to determine whether the delegation to an agency for adjudication is going to impede on Article III judges: 1. the extent to which the "essential attributes of Judicial power" are reserved to Article III courts 2. the extent to which the non-Article II forum exercises the range of jurisdiction and powers normally vested only in Article III courts 3. the origins and importance of the right to be adjudicated 4. the concerns that drove Congress to depart from the requirements of Article III |
|
|
Term
Admin Adjudication and Jury Trial |
|
Definition
7th amendment does not apply to agency adjudication --- Atlas Roofing Co., Inc. OSHRC |
|
|
Term
Protections of Administrative Law Judges |
|
Definition
The ALJ may not "be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of an employee or agency engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions for agency"
exceptions: - to agency, with like effect as in the case of the other orders and in its sound discretion may issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty |
|
|
Term
The Administrative Procedure Act |
|
Definition
Describes how agencies are supposed to act if the organic act does not dictate how an agency is supposed to act (First Organic Act, then APA) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
includes: 1. availability, timing and form of judicial review 2. scope of judicial review 3. role in regulating, rulemaking, and adjudication (553-558) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1. Agency disclosure of information 2. governs the availability, timing and form of judicial review of agency action 3. the scope of judicial review of agency decisions 4. regulates the procedures that agencies must employ when making decisions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the ultimate decision when making rules has to be based on the written record -- usually only used if required by statute |
|
|
Term
553(c) Requires:
The Florida East Coast Railway |
|
Definition
one the records needs to be verbatim in the organic act to require formal rulemaking 1. after hearing is not good enough to initiate formal rulemaking procedures |
|
|
Term
If on the record appears in the Organic Act then... |
|
Definition
the agency must follow APA 556/557 and requires trial like procedures 1. evidence taken with all parties present 2. issues subpoenas 3. rule on offers of proof 4. take depositions/have depositions taken 5. regulate the course of the hearing 6. hold conferences for settlement |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the amount of procedures that agencies have to follow are minimal or non-existent for informal activity |
|
|
Term
Informal Rulemaking Requirements |
|
Definition
1. Notice 2. Opportunity for Comment 3. Publication |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Agencies are free to impose additional requirements upon themselves, COURTS CANNOT IMPOSE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ON THE AGENCY |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The final decision for rulemaking has to be a logical outgrowth of the original rule. |
|
|
Term
Statutory Hybrid Rulemaking Defined |
|
Definition
The cross between informal and formal rulemaking used to describe procedures more extensive then what is in the APA and the Constitution |
|
|
Term
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Applies does not apply to: |
|
Definition
interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization procedure or practice |
|
|
Term
What is required for notice? |
|
Definition
1. must be published in the federal register 2. time, place and nature of rulemaking proceedings 3. reference to the legal authority for promulgating rules 4. terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issue involved |
|
|
Term
553(c):Statement and Basis and Purpose |
|
Definition
after consideration of the relevant matter presented, the agency shall incorporate in the rules adopted a concise general statement of their basis and purpose. |
|
|
Term
Basis and Purpose Contains: |
|
Definition
1.the agency's justification for its rule |
|
|
Term
553(c): opportunity for comment |
|
Definition
after notice required by this section, the agency shall give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of written data, views or arguments with or without opportunity for oral presentation. |
|
|
Term
Exemptions from Rulemaking: |
|
Definition
1.military or foreign affairs 2. a matter relating to agency management of personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits or contract 3. procedural rules 4. interpretative rules 5. policy statements 6. good cause |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Where normally procedural rules employ a substantive value judgment or substantially alter the rights of interest of regulated parties, the rules must be preceded by notice and comment because they are substantive |
|
|