Term
|
Definition
Why did person X do action Y |
|
|
Term
Attributions involve decisions regarding the |
|
Definition
extent to which behaviors are due to situational constraints vs internal traits |
|
|
Term
Behavior is due to something about that person (?) or something about the situation (?) |
|
Definition
About person= dispositions attributes situation= situational |
|
|
Term
Attributions theory- answers- |
|
Definition
how people explain the causes of their own and other people's behavior This answers the "why" of behavior |
|
|
Term
Why do we think about attributions |
|
Definition
social goals sense of control ability to predict |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
getting to know others finding friends and relationships |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
gives us a feeling that we can control the events surrounding us |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
understanding the cause and effect allows us to predict |
|
|
Term
Two characteristics that often lead to thinking about attributions (bc many situations don't always make us think about why a person acted in a particular way) |
|
Definition
1. events that are unexpected 2. events that are negative |
|
|
Term
Three classic views on attribution |
|
Definition
heiders naive psychologist jones and davis- correspondent influence theory Kelly's cube covariation model |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Fritz heider proposed that ppl naturally see cause and effect relationships (we're all naive psychologists) |
|
|
Term
Theory of naive psychology includes the fundamental- |
|
Definition
fundamental dichotomy- internal and external attributions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
disposistional (personal) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
When do we form internal attributions? |
|
Definition
if behavior is unusual or inappropriate (dancing on table at formal dinner) |
|
|
Term
When do we form external attributions? |
|
Definition
If situational causes are salient (dancing is being encouraged to occur) |
|
|
Term
Factors that influence perceptions of cause and effect in the theory of naive psychology |
|
Definition
Time btw events similarity of events ppl tend to identify single causes |
|
|
Term
Correspondent Inference theory is by |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Correspondent Inference theory central ideas |
|
Definition
motivated to draw correspondent infrences Interested in unique rather than common dispositions Primary goal of understanding is discovering unique dispositions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
invariant dispositions of a person that distinguish that person from others |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Cues in the correspondent inference theory that people use to determine the cause of a person's behavior |
|
Definition
choice expectedness effects of consequences of someones behavior |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
we choose the cause that covaries (goes along) with the behavior |
|
|
Term
covariation model says we attribute behvior to the factor that |
|
Definition
is present when the behavior occurs and absent when the behavior fails to occur |
|
|
Term
Covariation model focuses on 3 types of info: |
|
Definition
1. consistency 2. distinctiveness 3. consensus |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
does this person usually behave this way in this situation? |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
does this person behave this way in different situations |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
do others behave this way |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
does the person consistently do this -> (if yes, then) does this person only do it in this situation (if yes-> external/situational.. if no_> internal/dispositional) then-> does everyone do it? (yes-> situational, no-> dispositional) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|